Di Forti Marta, Quattrone Diego, Freeman Tom P, Tripoli Giada, Gayer-Anderson Charlotte, Quigley Harriet, Rodriguez Victoria, Jongsma Hannah E, Ferraro Laura, La Cascia Caterina, La Barbera Daniele, Tarricone Ilaria, Berardi Domenico, Szöke Andrei, Arango Celso, Tortelli Andrea, Velthorst Eva, Bernardo Miguel, Del-Ben Cristina Marta, Menezes Paulo Rossi, Selten Jean-Paul, Jones Peter B, Kirkbride James B, Rutten Bart Pf, de Haan Lieuwe, Sham Pak C, van Os Jim, Lewis Cathryn M, Lynskey Michael, Morgan Craig, Murray Robin M
Social, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, London, UK; National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Mental Health Biomedical Research Centre at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, UK; South London and Maudsley NHS Mental Health Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Social, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, London, UK; National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Mental Health Biomedical Research Centre at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, UK; South London and Maudsley NHS Mental Health Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Lancet Psychiatry. 2019 May;6(5):427-436. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(19)30048-3. Epub 2019 Mar 19.
Cannabis use is associated with increased risk of later psychotic disorder but whether it affects incidence of the disorder remains unclear. We aimed to identify patterns of cannabis use with the strongest effect on odds of psychotic disorder across Europe and explore whether differences in such patterns contribute to variations in the incidence rates of psychotic disorder.
We included patients aged 18-64 years who presented to psychiatric services in 11 sites across Europe and Brazil with first-episode psychosis and recruited controls representative of the local populations. We applied adjusted logistic regression models to the data to estimate which patterns of cannabis use carried the highest odds for psychotic disorder. Using Europe-wide and national data on the expected concentration of Δ-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) in the different types of cannabis available across the sites, we divided the types of cannabis used by participants into two categories: low potency (THC <10%) and high potency (THC ≥10%). Assuming causality, we calculated the population attributable fractions (PAFs) for the patterns of cannabis use associated with the highest odds of psychosis and the correlation between such patterns and the incidence rates for psychotic disorder across the study sites.
Between May 1, 2010, and April 1, 2015, we obtained data from 901 patients with first-episode psychosis across 11 sites and 1237 population controls from those same sites. Daily cannabis use was associated with increased odds of psychotic disorder compared with never users (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 3·2, 95% CI 2·2-4·1), increasing to nearly five-times increased odds for daily use of high-potency types of cannabis (4·8, 2·5-6·3). The PAFs calculated indicated that if high-potency cannabis were no longer available, 12·2% (95% CI 3·0-16·1) of cases of first-episode psychosis could be prevented across the 11 sites, rising to 30·3% (15·2-40·0) in London and 50·3% (27·4-66·0) in Amsterdam. The adjusted incident rates for psychotic disorder were positively correlated with the prevalence in controls across the 11 sites of use of high-potency cannabis (r = 0·7; p=0·0286) and daily use (r = 0·8; p=0·0109).
Differences in frequency of daily cannabis use and in use of high-potency cannabis contributed to the striking variation in the incidence of psychotic disorder across the 11 studied sites. Given the increasing availability of high-potency cannabis, this has important implications for public health.
Medical Research Council, the European Community's Seventh Framework Program grant, São Paulo Research Foundation, National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre (BRC) at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London and the NIHR BRC at University College London, Wellcome Trust.
使用大麻会增加日后患精神障碍的风险,但它是否会影响该疾病的发病率仍不清楚。我们旨在确定在欧洲对精神障碍患病几率影响最大的大麻使用模式,并探讨这些模式的差异是否会导致精神障碍发病率的变化。
我们纳入了年龄在18 - 64岁之间、在欧洲和巴西的11个地点因首次发作精神病而就诊于精神科服务机构的患者,并招募了代表当地人群的对照。我们对数据应用调整后的逻辑回归模型,以估计哪种大麻使用模式导致患精神障碍的几率最高。利用全欧洲和各地点不同类型大麻中Δ-四氢大麻酚(THC)预期浓度的国家数据,我们将参与者使用的大麻类型分为两类:低效力(THC <10%)和高效力(THC≥10%)。假设存在因果关系,我们计算了与患精神病几率最高相关的大麻使用模式的人群归因分数(PAF),以及这些模式与各研究地点精神障碍发病率之间的相关性。
在2010年5月1日至2015年4月1日期间,我们从11个地点的901例首次发作精神病患者以及来自同一地点的1237名人群对照中获取了数据。与从不使用者相比,每日使用大麻会增加患精神障碍的几率(调整后的优势比[OR] 3.2,95%置信区间2.2 - 4.1),对于每日使用高效力类型大麻的情况,几率增加至近五倍(4.8,2.5 - 6.3)。计算得出的PAF表明,如果不再有高效力大麻,在11个地点,12.2%(95%置信区间3.0 - 16.1)的首次发作精神病病例可以得到预防,在伦敦这一比例升至30.3%(15.2 - 40.0),在阿姆斯特丹则为50.3%(27.4 - 66.0)。在11个使用高效力大麻的地点,精神障碍的调整发病率与对照中的患病率呈正相关(r = 0.7;p = 0.0286),与每日使用率也呈正相关(r = 0.8;p = 0.0109)。
在11个研究地点,每日大麻使用频率和高效力大麻使用情况的差异导致了精神障碍发病率的显著变化。鉴于高效力大麻的可得性不断增加,这对公共卫生具有重要意义。
医学研究理事会、欧洲共同体第七框架计划资助、圣保罗研究基金会、国家卫生研究院(NIHR)南伦敦和莫兹利国民保健服务基金会信托及伦敦国王学院的生物医学研究中心(BRC)、伦敦大学学院的NIHR BRC、惠康信托基金会。