Gavelli Francesco, Teboul Jean-Louis, Azzolina Danila, Beurton Alexandra, Taccheri Temistocle, Adda Imane, Lai Christopher, Avanzi Gian Carlo, Monnet Xavier
Service de médecine intensive - réanimation, Hôpitaux universitaires Paris-Saclay, Hôpital de Bicêtre, APHP, 78, rue du Général Leclerc, 94270, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France.
Inserm UMR S_999, Univ Paris-Saclay, 78, rue du Général Leclerc, 94270, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France.
Ann Intensive Care. 2020 Mar 2;10(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s13613-020-0644-2.
It has been suggested that, by recruiting lung regions and enlarging the distribution volume of the cold indicator, increasing the positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) may lead to an artefactual overestimation of extravascular lung water (EVLW) by transpulmonary thermodilution (TPTD).
In 60 ARDS patients, we measured EVLW (PiCCO2 device) at a PEEP level set to reach a plateau pressure of 30 cmHO (HighPEEP) and 15 and 45 min after decreasing PEEP to 5 cmHO (LowPEEP and LowPEEP, respectively). Then, we increased PEEP back to the baseline level (HighPEEP). Between HighPEEP and LowPEEP, we estimated the degree of lung derecruitment either by measuring changes in the compliance of the respiratory system (Crs) in the whole population, or by measuring the lung derecruited volume in 30 patients. We defined patients with a large derecruitment from the other ones as patients in whom the Crs changes and the measured derecruited volume were larger than the median of these variables observed in the whole population.
Reducing PEEP from HighPEEP (14 ± 2 cmHO) to LowPEEP significantly decreased EVLW from 20 ± 4 to 18 ± 4 mL/kg, central venous pressure (CVP) from 15 ± 4 to 12 ± 4 mmHg, the arterial oxygen tension over inspired oxygen fraction (PaO/FiO) ratio from 184 ± 76 to 150 ± 69 mmHg and lung volume by 144 [68-420] mL. The EVLW decrease was similar in "large derecruiters" and the other patients. When PEEP was re-increased to HighPEEP, CVP, PaO/FiO and EVLW significantly re-increased. At linear mixed effect model, EVLW changes were significantly determined only by changes in PEEP and CVP (p < 0.001 and p = 0.03, respectively, n = 60). When the same analysis was performed by estimating recruitment according to lung volume changes (n = 30), CVP remained significantly associated to the changes in EVLW (p < 0.001).
In ARDS patients, changing the PEEP level induced parallel, small and reversible changes in EVLW. These changes were not due to an artefact of the TPTD technique and were likely due to the PEEP-induced changes in CVP, which is the backward pressure of the lung lymphatic drainage. Trial registration ID RCB: 2015-A01654-45. Registered 23 October 2015.
有人提出,通过募集肺区域和扩大冷指示剂的分布容积,增加呼气末正压(PEEP)可能会导致经肺热稀释法(TPTD)对血管外肺水(EVLW)的人为高估。
在60例急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)患者中,我们在设定PEEP水平以达到30 cmH₂O的平台压(高PEEP)时测量EVLW(脉搏指示连续心输出量监测仪PiCCO2设备),并在将PEEP降至5 cmH₂O后15分钟和45分钟时测量(分别为低PEEP和低PEEP)。然后,我们将PEEP恢复到基线水平(高PEEP)。在高PEEP和低PEEP之间,我们通过测量整个人群呼吸系统顺应性(Crs)的变化,或通过测量30例患者的肺复张容积来估计肺复张程度。我们将与其他患者肺复张程度差异大的患者定义为Crs变化和测量的肺复张容积大于整个人群中观察到的这些变量中位数的患者。
将PEEP从高PEEP(14±2 cmH₂O)降至低PEEP显著降低了EVLW,从20±4降至18±4 mL/kg,中心静脉压(CVP)从15±4降至12±4 mmHg,动脉血氧分压与吸入氧分数之比(PaO₂/FiO₂)从184±76降至150±69 mmHg,肺容积减少了144 [68 - 420] mL。“肺复张程度大的患者”和其他患者的EVLW降低相似。当PEEP重新增加到高PEEP时,CVP、PaO₂/FiO₂和EVLW显著再次增加。在线性混合效应模型中,EVLW变化仅由PEEP和CVP的变化显著决定(分别为p < 0.001和p = 0.03,n = 60)。当根据肺容积变化估计复张情况进行相同分析时(n = 30),CVP仍然与EVLW的变化显著相关(p < 0.001)。
在ARDS患者中,改变PEEP水平会引起EVLW平行、微小且可逆的变化。这些变化不是由于TPTD技术的假象,可能是由于PEEP引起的CVP变化,而CVP是肺淋巴引流的反向压力。试验注册号:RCB:2015 - A01654 - 45。于2015年10月23日注册。