• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较神经内科和神经外科中心不同配比的护理助手和注册护士混合护理人员配置模式对护理结果和成本的影响。

Comparison of nursing aids and registered nurses mixed nursing staffing model with different ratios on the nursing outcomes and cost in Neurology and Neurosurgery Center.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, The 2nd Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, 246 Xuefu Road, Harbin, 150001, China.

出版信息

Ir J Med Sci. 2019 Nov;188(4):1435-1441. doi: 10.1007/s11845-019-01988-8. Epub 2019 Mar 21.

DOI:10.1007/s11845-019-01988-8
PMID:30903451
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to investigate the effect of nursing aids (NAs) and registered nurses (RNs) mixed nursing staffing model with different ratios on the nursing outcomes and cost in China.

METHODS

Five thousand and ninety-one patients treated at Neurology and Neurosurgery Center were consecutively recruited in this study and divided into three groups according to the proportion of NAs and RNs: 100% RN group (N = 1756), 90% RN group (N = 1654), and 75% RN group (N = 1681). Nursing outcomes including medication error, unplanned endotracheal tube extubation, bloodstream infection, respiratory tract infection, urinary tract infection, pressure ulcer, ventilator weaning, morality, hospital stay, and nursing cost were recorded.

RESULTS

No difference of patients' characteristics or RNs' characteristics among three groups was observed. Three-group comparison disclosed that medication error, urinary tract infection, ventilator weaning, and nursing cost were different among three groups, while no difference of unplanned endotracheal tube extubation, bloodstream infection, respiratory tract infection, pressure ulcer, mortality, or hospital stay was found. Two-group comparison revealed that medication error and nursing cost were reduced in 75% RN group compared with 90% RN group and 100% RN group, but urinary tract infection was increased while ventilator weaning was decreased in 75% RN group and 90% RN group compared with 100% RN group. Multivariate logistic regression also validated 75% RNs independently correlated with decreased medication error, ventilator weaning, and increased urinary tract infection.

CONCLUSIONS

NAs and RNs mixed nursing staffing model with 75% RNs reduces medication error and nursing cost, while increasing urinary tract infection and decreasing ventilator weaning.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在探讨不同比例的护理助理(NA)和注册护士(RN)混合护理人员配备模式对中国护理结局和成本的影响。

方法

本研究连续招募了神经内科和神经外科中心的 5091 名患者,根据 NA 和 RN 的比例将患者分为三组:100%RN 组(N=1756)、90%RN 组(N=1654)和 75%RN 组(N=1681)。记录护理结局,包括用药错误、计划性气管插管意外脱出、血流感染、呼吸道感染、尿路感染、压疮、呼吸机撤离、死亡率、住院时间和护理成本。

结果

三组患者的一般资料和 RN 人员特征无差异。三组比较发现,用药错误、尿路感染、呼吸机撤离和护理成本存在差异,而计划性气管插管意外脱出、血流感染、呼吸道感染、压疮、死亡率和住院时间无差异。两组比较发现,与 90%RN 组和 100%RN 组相比,75%RN 组的用药错误和护理成本降低,但尿路感染增加,呼吸机撤离减少;75%RN 组和 90%RN 组的用药错误和护理成本均低于 100%RN 组。多因素 logistic 回归也验证了 75%RN 与用药错误、呼吸机撤离减少和尿路感染增加独立相关。

结论

75%RN 的 NA 和 RN 混合护理人员配备模式可降低用药错误和护理成本,增加尿路感染,减少呼吸机撤离。

相似文献

1
Comparison of nursing aids and registered nurses mixed nursing staffing model with different ratios on the nursing outcomes and cost in Neurology and Neurosurgery Center.比较神经内科和神经外科中心不同配比的护理助手和注册护士混合护理人员配置模式对护理结果和成本的影响。
Ir J Med Sci. 2019 Nov;188(4):1435-1441. doi: 10.1007/s11845-019-01988-8. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
2
The impact of three nursing staffing models on nursing outcomes.三种护理人员配置模式对护理结果的影响。
J Adv Nurs. 2015 Aug;71(8):1847-56. doi: 10.1111/jan.12643. Epub 2015 Mar 5.
3
The impact of different nursing skill mix models on patient outcomes in a respiratory care center.不同护理技能配比模式对呼吸治疗中心患者结局的影响。
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2012 Dec;9(4):227-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-6787.2012.00246.x. Epub 2012 Apr 10.
4
Nurse Staffing and Quality of Care of Nursing Home Residents in Korea.韩国养老院护理人员配置与护理院居民护理质量
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2015 Nov;47(6):555-64. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12166. Epub 2015 Oct 14.
5
Nurse staffing and patient outcomes.
Nurs Outlook. 1998 Sep-Oct;46(5):199-200. doi: 10.1016/s0029-6554(98)90047-1.
6
Nurse staffing and patient outcomes.护士配备与患者预后。
Nurs Res. 1998 Jan-Feb;47(1):43-50. doi: 10.1097/00006199-199801000-00008.
7
RN staffing time and outcomes of long-stay nursing home residents: pressure ulcers and other adverse outcomes are less likely as RNs spend more time on direct patient care.注册护士的工作时间与长期护理院居民的护理结果:随着注册护士在直接护理患者上花费的时间增加,发生压疮及其他不良护理结果的可能性降低。
Am J Nurs. 2005 Nov;105(11):58-70; quiz 71. doi: 10.1097/00000446-200511000-00028.
8
Effects of registered nurse staffing on quality of care and resident outcomes in nursing homes.注册护士配置对养老院护理质量和居民结果的影响。
Geriatr Nurs. 2020 Nov-Dec;41(6):685-691. doi: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2020.04.001. Epub 2020 May 6.
9
Nurse staffing, nursing assistants and hospital mortality: retrospective longitudinal cohort study.护士人力配置、护理助理和医院死亡率:回顾性纵向队列研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2019 Aug;28(8):609-617. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2018-008043. Epub 2018 Dec 4.
10
Comparability of nurse staffing measures in examining the relationship between RN staffing and unit-acquired pressure ulcers: a unit-level descriptive, correlational study.在研究注册护士人员配备与单位获得性压疮之间的关系时护士人员配备措施的可比性:一项单位层面的描述性、相关性研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2014 Oct;51(10):1344-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2014.02.011. Epub 2014 Feb 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of the clinical effectiveness of bundled care interventions on pressure ulcer incidence in neurosurgical patients.综合护理干预对神经外科患者压疮发生率的临床效果评估。
Front Public Health. 2025 Jun 10;13:1576633. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1576633. eCollection 2025.
2
Implementing care-related services in care units - an interview study.在护理单元实施护理相关服务——一项访谈研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Aug 23;24(1):976. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11465-3.
3
Review on Comfort Nursing Interventions for Patients Undergoing Neurosurgery and General Surgery.

本文引用的文献

1
After the Medication Error: Recent Nursing Graduates' Reflections on Adequacy of Education.用药错误之后:近期护理专业毕业生对教育充分性的反思
J Nurs Educ. 2018 May 1;57(5):275-280. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20180420-04.
2
Proportion of medication error reporting and associated factors among nurses: a cross sectional study.护士用药错误报告比例及其相关因素:一项横断面研究。
BMC Nurs. 2018 Mar 12;17:9. doi: 10.1186/s12912-018-0280-4. eCollection 2018.
3
Human-simulation-based learning to prevent medication error: A systematic review.
神经外科和普通外科手术患者舒适护理干预综述
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2022 Aug 10;2022:6735054. doi: 10.1155/2022/6735054. eCollection 2022.
基于人体模拟的学习以预防用药错误:系统评价。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2019 Feb;25(1):11-20. doi: 10.1111/jep.12883. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
4
Pediatric Nurses' Perceptions of Medication Safety and Medication Error: A Mixed Methods Study.儿科护士对用药安全和用药错误的认知:一项混合方法研究。
Compr Child Adolesc Nurs. 2018 Jun;41(2):94-110. doi: 10.1080/24694193.2017.1323977. Epub 2017 May 30.
5
The Relationship Between Work Commitment, Dynamic, and Medication Error.工作投入、动态因素与用药差错之间的关系
Clin Nurs Res. 2018 Jul;27(6):660-674. doi: 10.1177/1054773817707290. Epub 2017 May 16.
6
Evidence-based nursing implementation in Mainland China: A scoping review.中国大陆基于证据的护理实施:一项范围综述。
Nurs Outlook. 2017 Jan-Feb;65(1):27-35. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2016.07.016. Epub 2016 Aug 24.
7
The impact of three nursing staffing models on nursing outcomes.三种护理人员配置模式对护理结果的影响。
J Adv Nurs. 2015 Aug;71(8):1847-56. doi: 10.1111/jan.12643. Epub 2015 Mar 5.
8
The impact of different nursing skill mix models on patient outcomes in a respiratory care center.不同护理技能配比模式对呼吸治疗中心患者结局的影响。
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2012 Dec;9(4):227-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-6787.2012.00246.x. Epub 2012 Apr 10.
9
Nurses' perceptions of how physical environment affects medication errors in acute care settings.护士对急性护理环境中物理环境如何影响用药错误的看法。
Appl Nurs Res. 2011 Nov;24(4):229-37. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2009.08.005. Epub 2009 Oct 15.
10
Nurse staffing and patient outcomes in critical care: a concise review.重症监护护士人力配置与患者结局:简要综述
Crit Care Med. 2010 Jul;38(7):1521-8; quiz 1529. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181e47888.