Increasing engagement in peer review.
作者信息
Keating Nancy L, Mohile Supriya G
机构信息
Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America.
James Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, United States of America.
出版信息
J Geriatr Oncol. 2019 Jul;10(4):526-527. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2019.03.004. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Increasing engagement in peer review.提高同行评审的参与度。
J Geriatr Oncol. 2019 Jul;10(4):526-527. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2019.03.004. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
2
A better measure of research from the global south.对来自全球南方地区研究的一种更好衡量方式。
Nature. 2018 Jul;559(7712):23-26. doi: 10.1038/d41586-018-05581-4.
3
Co-production from proposal to paper.从提案到论文的共同创作。
Nature. 2018 Oct;562(7725):29-31. doi: 10.1038/d41586-018-06861-9.
4
Unique Review Criteria and Patient and Stakeholder Reviewers: Analysis of PCORI's Approach to Research Funding.独特的评审标准和患者及利益相关者评审员：对 PCORI 研究资助方法的分析。
Value Health. 2018 Oct;21(10):1152-1160. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.03.017. Epub 2018 Jun 8.
5
Peer review, science, young investigators feelings and frustrations.同行评审、科学、青年研究者的感受与挫折
Acta Cir Bras. 2011 Feb;26(1):77-8. doi: 10.1590/s0102-86502011000100014.
6
Training peer reviewers.培训同行评审员。
Nature. 2006 Oct 19;443(7113):880. doi: 10.1038/nj7113-880b.
7
A Commitment to Gender Diversity in Peer Review.同行评审中对性别多样性的承诺。
Cell. 2019 Sep 19;179(1):1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.08.043. Epub 2019 Sep 13.
8
Engage more early-career scientists as peer reviewers.让更多早期职业科学家担任同行评审员。
Nature. 2018 Aug;560(7718):307. doi: 10.1038/d41586-018-05956-7.
9
Peer review: recognition via year-end statements.同行评审：通过年终报表进行认可。
Nature. 2003 May 8;423(6936):116. doi: 10.1038/423116b.
10
Peer review: Close inspection.同行评审：仔细审查。
Nature. 2016 May 12;533(7602):279-81. doi: 10.1038/nj7602-279a.
引用本文的文献
1
Peer Review and Medical Journals.同行评审与医学期刊。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2024 Jan-Dec;15:21501319241252235. doi: 10.1177/21501319241252235.
本文引用的文献
1
The changing forms and expectations of peer review.同行评审不断变化的形式与期望。
Res Integr Peer Rev. 2018 Sep 20;3:8. doi: 10.1186/s41073-018-0051-5. eCollection 2018.
2
The Role of Gender in Publication in The Journal of Pediatrics 2015-2016: Equal Reviews, Unequal Opportunities.《儿科学杂志》2015-2016 年发表文章中的性别角色：同等评价，不均机会。
J Pediatr. 2018 Sep;200:254-260.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.06.059. Epub 2018 Jul 17.
3
Scholarly publishing depends on peer reviewers.学术出版依赖同行评审人员。
Pharm Pract (Granada). 2018 Jan-Mar;16(1):1236. doi: 10.18549/PharmPract.2018.01.1236. Epub 2018 Mar 27.
4
Let's make peer review scientific.让我们使同行评审科学化。
Nature. 2016 Jul 7;535(7610):31-3. doi: 10.1038/535031a.
5
What makes a good reviewer and a good review for a general medical journal?对于一本普通医学期刊而言，怎样才算是一名优秀的审稿人以及一篇优秀的综述呢？
JAMA. 1998 Jul 15;280(3):231-3. doi: 10.1001/jama.280.3.231.
Zotero 插件