• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

学术出版依赖同行评审人员。

Scholarly publishing depends on peer reviewers.

作者信息

Fernandez-Llimos Fernando

机构信息

Editor-in-chief, Pharmacy Practice. Institute for Medicines Research (iMed.ULisboa), Department of Social Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universidade de Lisboa.. Lisbon (Portugal).

出版信息

Pharm Pract (Granada). 2018 Jan-Mar;16(1):1236. doi: 10.18549/PharmPract.2018.01.1236. Epub 2018 Mar 27.

DOI:10.18549/PharmPract.2018.01.1236
PMID:29619142
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5881486/
Abstract

The peer-review crisis is posing a risk to the scholarly peer-reviewed journal system. Journals have to ask many potential peer reviewers to obtain a minimum acceptable number of peers accepting reviewing a manuscript. Several solutions have been suggested to overcome this shortage. From reimbursing for the job, to eliminating pre-publication reviews, one cannot predict which is more dangerous for the future of scholarly publishing. And, why not acknowledging their contribution to the final version of the article published? PubMed created two categories of contributors: authors [AU] and collaborators [IR]. Why not a third category for the peer-reviewer?

摘要

同行评审危机正对学术同行评审期刊系统构成风险。期刊不得不邀请众多潜在的同行评审人员，以获得最低可接受数量的同行同意评审稿件。人们已经提出了几种解决方案来克服这种短缺。从为这项工作提供报销到取消出版前评审，人们无法预测哪种方案对学术出版的未来危害更大。而且，为什么不认可他们对已发表文章最终版本的贡献呢？医学期刊数据库（PubMed）创建了两类贡献者：作者[AU]和合作者[IR]。为什么不为同行评审人员设立第三类呢？

相似文献

1
Scholarly publishing depends on peer reviewers.学术出版依赖同行评审人员。
Pharm Pract (Granada). 2018 Jan-Mar;16(1):1236. doi: 10.18549/PharmPract.2018.01.1236. Epub 2018 Mar 27.
2
Peer review and publication delay.同行评审与出版延迟。
Pharm Pract (Granada). 2019 Jan-Mar;17(1):1502. doi: 10.18549/PharmPract.2019.1.1502. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
3
A Learned Society's Perspective on Publishing.一个学术团体对出版的看法。
J Neurochem. 2016 Oct;139 Suppl 2:17-23. doi: 10.1111/jnc.13674. Epub 2016 Aug 17.
4
How many manuscripts should I peer review per year?我每年应该同行评审多少篇稿件？
Pharm Pract (Granada). 2020 Jan-Mar;18(1):1804. doi: 10.18549/PharmPract.2020.1.1804. Epub 2020 Jan 14.
5
The bane of publishing a research article in international journals by African researchers, the peer-review process and the contentious issue of predatory journals: a commentary.非洲研究人员在国际期刊上发表研究文章的障碍、同行评审过程以及掠夺性期刊这一有争议的问题：一篇评论
Pan Afr Med J. 2019 Mar 14;32:119. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2019.32.119.18351. eCollection 2019.
6
Authors, peer reviewers, and readers: What is expected from each player in collaborative publishing?作者、同行评审人员和读者：合作出版中对每个参与者有何期望？
Pharm Pract (Granada). 2021 Jan-Mar;19(1):2284. doi: 10.18549/PharmPract.2021.1.2284. Epub 2021 Jan 14.
7
How to identify peer-reviewed publications: Open-identity labels in scholarly book publishing.如何识别同行评审出版物：学术书籍出版中的开放身份标签。
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 25;14(3):e0214423. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214423. eCollection 2019.
8
[The recognition of peer reviewers activity: the potential promotion of a virtuous circle.].[同行评审员活动的认可：对良性循环的潜在促进。]
Recenti Prog Med. 2017 Sep;108(9):355-359. doi: 10.1701/2745.27985.
9
Recent Issues in Medical Journal Publishing and Editing Policies: Adoption of Artificial Intelligence, Preprints, Open Peer Review, Model Text Recycling Policies, Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing 4th Version, and Country Names in Titles.医学期刊出版与编辑政策的近期问题：人工智能的应用、预印本、开放同行评审、模型文本回收政策、学术出版最佳实践第4版以及标题中的国名
Neurointervention. 2023 Mar;18(1):2-8. doi: 10.5469/neuroint.2022.00493. Epub 2023 Feb 1.
10
Variability of Reviewers' Comments in the Peer Review Process for Orthopaedic Research.骨科研究同行评审过程中审稿人意见的可变性
Spine Deform. 2016 Jul;4(4):268-271. doi: 10.1016/j.jspd.2016.01.004. Epub 2016 Jun 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Publication speed in pharmacy practice journals: A comparative analysis.药学实践期刊的出版速度：比较分析。
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 29;16(6):e0253713. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253713. eCollection 2021.
2
Authors, peer reviewers, and readers: What is expected from each player in collaborative publishing?作者、同行评审人员和读者：合作出版中对每个参与者有何期望？
Pharm Pract (Granada). 2021 Jan-Mar;19(1):2284. doi: 10.18549/PharmPract.2021.1.2284. Epub 2021 Jan 14.
3
What is there in the scoring and rating of journals?期刊的评分和评级是怎样的？
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2020 Jul;11(Suppl 4):S684-S685. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2020.07.010. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
4
How many manuscripts should I peer review per year?我每年应该同行评审多少篇稿件？
Pharm Pract (Granada). 2020 Jan-Mar;18(1):1804. doi: 10.18549/PharmPract.2020.1.1804. Epub 2020 Jan 14.
5
Peer review and publication delay.同行评审与出版延迟。
Pharm Pract (Granada). 2019 Jan-Mar;17(1):1502. doi: 10.18549/PharmPract.2019.1.1502. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
6
Increasing engagement in peer review.提高同行评审的参与度。
J Geriatr Oncol. 2019 Jul;10(4):526-527. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2019.03.004. Epub 2019 Mar 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Institution of Just Culture Physician Peer Review in an Academic Medical Center.医疗机构公正文化下的医生同行评议——以某学术医疗中心为例。
J Patient Saf. 2021 Oct 1;17(7):e689-e693. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000449.
2
A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review.关于同行评审中新兴及未来创新的多学科视角。
F1000Res. 2017 Jul 20;6:1151. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.12037.3. eCollection 2017.
3
The current peer review system is unsustainable-awaken the paid reviewer force!当前的同行评审系统难以为继——唤醒付费评审大军！
Clin Biochem. 2017 Jun;50(9):461-463. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2017.02.019. Epub 2017 Feb 27.
4
Delayed decisions-how long is too long?延迟决策——多长时间才算过长？
J Hip Preserv Surg. 2016 Aug 17;3(3):169-70. doi: 10.1093/jhps/hnw029. eCollection 2016 Aug.
5
Let's make peer review scientific.让我们使同行评审科学化。
Nature. 2016 Jul 7;535(7610):31-3. doi: 10.1038/535031a.
6
Does it take too long to publish research?发表研究成果耗时过长吗？
Nature. 2016 Feb 11;530(7589):148-51. doi: 10.1038/530148a.
7
Nature journals offer double-blind review.《自然》系列期刊提供双盲评审。
Nature. 2015 Feb 19;518(7539):274. doi: 10.1038/518274b.