MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Lancet Glob Health. 2019 May;7(5):e585-e595. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30037-3. Epub 2019 Mar 20.
In the context of WHO's End TB strategy, there is a need to focus future control efforts on those interventions and innovations that would be most effective in accelerating declines in tuberculosis burden. Using a modelling approach to link the tuberculosis care cascade to transmission, we aimed to identify which improvements in the cascade would yield the greatest effect on incidence and mortality.
We engaged with national tuberculosis programmes in three country settings (India, Kenya, and Moldova) as illustrative examples of settings with a large private sector (India), a high HIV burden (Kenya), and a high burden of multidrug resistance (Moldova). We collated WHO country burden estimates, routine surveillance data, and tuberculosis prevalence surveys from 2011 (for India) and 2016 (for Kenya). Linking the tuberculosis care cascade to tuberculosis transmission using a mathematical model with Bayesian melding in each setting, we examined which cascade shortfalls would have the greatest effect on incidence and mortality, and how the cascade could be used to monitor future control efforts.
Modelling suggests that combined measures to strengthen the care cascade could reduce cumulative tuberculosis incidence by 38% (95% Bayesian credible intervals 27-43) in India, 31% (25-41) in Kenya, and 27% (17-41) in Moldova between 2018 and 2035. For both incidence and mortality, modelling suggests that the most important cascade losses are the proportion of patients visiting the private health-care sector in India, missed diagnosis in health-care settings in Kenya, and drug sensitivity testing in Moldova. In all settings, the most influential delay is the interval before a patient's first presentation for care. In future interventions, the proportion of individuals with tuberculosis who are on high-quality treatment could offer a more robust monitoring tool than routine notifications of tuberculosis.
Linked to transmission, the care cascade can be valuable, not only for improving patient outcomes but also in identifying and monitoring programmatic priorities to reduce tuberculosis incidence and mortality.
US Agency for International Development, Stop TB Partnership, UK Medical Research Council, and Department for International Development.
在世卫组织的终结结核病战略框架下,需要将未来的控制工作重点放在那些最能有效加速结核病负担下降的干预措施和创新措施上。本研究采用建模方法将结核病护理链与传播联系起来,旨在确定护理链中的哪些改进将对发病率和死亡率产生最大影响。
我们与三个国家的国家结核病规划(印度、肯尼亚和摩尔多瓦)合作,将其作为具有庞大私营部门(印度)、高艾滋病毒负担(肯尼亚)和高耐多药结核病负担(摩尔多瓦)的代表性国家。我们收集了世卫组织国家负担估计数、常规监测数据以及 2011 年(印度)和 2016 年(肯尼亚)的结核病患病率调查。在每个国家,我们使用具有贝叶斯融合的数学模型将结核病护理链与结核病传播联系起来,研究哪些护理链缺陷对发病率和死亡率的影响最大,以及如何利用护理链监测未来的控制工作。
模型表明,在印度、肯尼亚和摩尔多瓦,综合强化护理链的措施可能会在 2018 年至 2035 年间将累计结核病发病率分别降低 38%(95%贝叶斯可信区间 27-43)、31%(25-41)和 27%(17-41)。对于发病率和死亡率,模型表明,最重要的护理链损失是印度私营医疗保健部门就诊的患者比例、肯尼亚医疗机构漏诊和摩尔多瓦药物敏感性检测。在所有国家,最具影响力的延迟是患者首次就诊的间隔时间。在未来的干预措施中,高质量治疗的结核病患者比例可能提供比常规结核病报告更有效的监测工具。
与传播相关联,护理链不仅可改善患者结局,还可用于确定和监测规划重点,以降低结核病发病率和死亡率。
美国国际开发署、遏制结核病伙伴关系、英国医学研究理事会和国际发展部。