Research Department, African Institute for Development Policy, Nairobi, Kenya
African Institute for Development Policy (AFIDEP), Nairobi, Kenya.
BMJ Open. 2024 Apr 3;14(4):e077989. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077989.
Tuberculosis (TB) remains a public health concern in Kenya despite the massive global efforts towards ending TB. The impediments to TB prevention and care efforts include poor health systems, resource limitations and other sociopolitical contexts that inform policy and implementation. Notably, TB cases are much higher in men than women. Therefore, the political economy analysis (PEA) study provides in-depth contexts and understanding of the gender gaps to access and successful treatment for TB infection.
PEA adopts a qualitative, in-depth approach through key informant interviews (KII) and documentary analysis.
The KIIs were distributed among government entities, academia, non-state actors and community TB groups from Kenya.
The themes identified were mapped onto the applied PEA analysis framework domains. The contextual and institutional issues included gender concerns related to the disconnect between TB policies and gender inclusion aspects, such as low prioritisation for TB programmes, limited use of evidence to inform decisions and poor health system structures. The broad barriers influencing the social contexts for TB programmes were social stigma and cultural norms such as traditional interventions that negatively impact health-seeking behaviours. The themes around the economic situation were poverty and unemployment, food insecurity and malnutrition. The political context centred around the systemic and governance gaps in the health system from the national and devolved health functions.
Broad contextual factors identified from the PEA widen the disparity in targeted gender efforts toward men. Following the development of effective TB policies and strategies, it is essential to have well-planned gendered responsive interventions with a clear implementation plan and monitoring system to enhance access to TB prevention and care.
尽管全球在终结结核病方面做出了巨大努力,但结核病仍然是肯尼亚的公共卫生关注点。结核病预防和护理工作的障碍包括卫生系统不完善、资源有限以及其他影响政策和实施的社会政治背景。值得注意的是,结核病在男性中的发病率远高于女性。因此,政治经济学分析(PEA)研究深入了解了性别差距的背景和原因,以及这些差距对结核病感染的获得和成功治疗的影响。
PEA 采用定性、深入的方法,通过关键知情人访谈(KII)和文献分析。
KII 在肯尼亚的政府实体、学术界、非政府行为者和社区结核病组织中进行了分配。
确定的主题被映射到应用的 PEA 分析框架领域。包括与结核病政策和性别包容方面脱节相关的性别问题的背景和制度问题,例如结核病方案的优先级低、有限地利用证据来做出决策以及卫生系统结构不佳。影响结核病方案社会背景的广泛障碍包括社会耻辱感和文化规范,例如对寻求健康行为产生负面影响的传统干预措施。与经济状况相关的主题是贫困和失业、粮食不安全和营养不良。政治背景围绕国家和权力下放的卫生职能中的卫生系统的系统性和治理差距。
PEA 确定的广泛背景因素扩大了针对男性的有针对性的性别努力的差距。在制定有效的结核病政策和战略之后,必须制定有明确实施计划和监测系统的有针对性的性别响应干预措施,以增强获得结核病预防和护理的机会。