Poli Pier Paolo, Maridati Paolo Carlo, Stoffella Enrico, Beretta Mario, Maiorana Carlo
PhD Student, Implant Center for Edentulism and Jawbone Atrophies, Maxillofacial Surgery and Odontostomatology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda Maggiore Policlinico Hospital, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Attending Physician, Implant Center for Edentulism and Jawbone Atrophies, Maxillofacial Surgery and Odontostomatology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda Maggiore Policlinico Hospital, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019 Jun;77(6):1170-1179. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2019.02.030. Epub 2019 Feb 26.
The timing for soft tissue augmentation during implant therapy is still debated. Therefore, the present study clinically evaluated whether immediate versus delayed soft tissue augmentation procedures had an impact on the stability of peri-implant mucosal thickness (PMT).
Patients requiring a single implant posterior to the canines in association with soft tissue augmentation procedures at the buccal aspect of single implants using a connective tissue graft (CTG) were enrolled. Patients were randomly allocated to 2 different timing protocols: simultaneous implant and CTG placement (test group) or implant placement and then CTG placement after 3 months (control group). PMT was measured clinically at the mid-buccal aspect of the implant site by bone sounding with an endodontic K-file using customized acrylic stents. PMT measurements were recorded before and after implant placement and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, and 12 months after implant insertion. Parametric statistical tests were used to compare PMT between the test and control groups at each study period and to evaluate changes in PMT over time. The level of significance was set at a P value less than .05.
Fourteen implants placed in 14 patients were available for statistical comparison. At 12 months, the difference in PMT between the test and control groups was 0.12 ± 0.51 mm. This difference was not statistically significant (P = .54). A significant increase in PMT was observed from baseline to 12 months after implantation in the test (P = .004) and control (P < .001) groups.
The present study indicated that changes in PMT after CTG placement were not influenced by the timing of soft tissue augmentation and remained stable up to 1 year after implant insertion.
种植治疗期间软组织增量的时机仍存在争议。因此,本研究在临床上评估了即刻与延迟软组织增量程序对种植体周围黏膜厚度(PMT)稳定性的影响。
纳入需要在尖牙后方植入单个种植体并在单个种植体颊侧使用结缔组织移植(CTG)进行软组织增量程序的患者。患者被随机分配到2种不同的时机方案:种植体与CTG同时植入(试验组)或先植入种植体,3个月后再植入CTG(对照组)。使用定制的丙烯酸支架,通过用根管锉进行骨探测,在种植体部位的颊侧中部临床测量PMT。在种植体植入前和植入后,以及植入后1、2、3、4、6、9和12个月记录PMT测量值。使用参数统计检验比较试验组和对照组在每个研究时期的PMT,并评估PMT随时间的变化。显著性水平设定为P值小于0.05。
14例患者植入的14枚种植体可用于统计比较。在12个月时,试验组和对照组之间的PMT差异为0.12±0.51mm。这种差异无统计学意义(P = 0.54)。试验组(P = 0.004)和对照组(P < 0.001)从基线到植入后12个月均观察到PMT显著增加。
本研究表明,CTG植入后PMT的变化不受软组织增量时机的影响,并且在种植体植入后长达1年保持稳定。