• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

BRCA1/2 基因突变且年龄在 60 岁及以上的女性是否应接受强化乳腺癌筛查?-成本效益分析。

Should women with a BRCA1/2 mutation aged 60 and older be offered intensified breast cancer screening? - A cost-effectiveness analysis.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.

Department of Radiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Breast. 2019 Jun;45:82-88. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2019.03.004. Epub 2019 Mar 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.breast.2019.03.004
PMID:30904701
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to investigate the cost-effectiveness of intensified breast cancer (BC) screening for women with a BRCA1/2 mutation aged 60-74. Simulated strategies were: (0) annual mammography as reference, (1) alternating annual mammography and MRI for women with dense breasts only; (2) addition of annual MRI for women with dense breasts only; (3) addition of annual MRI for all women.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A validated micro-simulation model of invasive BC was updated and validated for interval BC rates and tumor size distribution. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) of all three intensified strategies were compared to the next best strategy and stratified for BRCA1 and BRCA2. Discount rates for costs and life years gained (LYG) were 1.5% and 4% for the Dutch situation; 3% and 3% for international comparison. A threshold of €20,000 per LYG was applied.

RESULTS

All intensified strategies showed more detected BCs and LYG, reduced BC deaths, and increased false positives. The Dutch discounted ICER of intensified strategy 1 compared to annual mammography was €38,000 per LYG in BRCA1 mutation carriers and €18,000 per LYG in BRCA2 mutation carriers. Further intensified strategies showed an ICER above the threshold when compared to this strategy. With international discount rate, the ICERs of all intensified strategies were above the threshold.

CONCLUSION

Of the three alternative strategies, only alternating annual MRI and mammography for BRCA2 mutation carriers and dense breasts aged 60-75 is cost-effective compared to annual mammography. For BRCA1 mutation carriers, none of the alternative strategies is cost-effective compared to the next best strategy.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨对 60-74 岁携带 BRCA1/2 突变的女性进行强化乳腺癌(BC)筛查的成本效益。模拟的策略如下:(0)以每年乳房 X 光检查作为参考,(1)对于致密乳腺的女性,交替进行每年的乳房 X 光检查和 MRI;(2)对于致密乳腺的女性,增加每年的 MRI;(3)对于所有女性,增加每年的 MRI。

材料和方法

对一种经过验证的浸润性 BC 微观模拟模型进行了更新和验证,以用于间隔性 BC 发生率和肿瘤大小分布。比较了所有三种强化策略的增量成本效益比(ICER),并根据 BRCA1 和 BRCA2 进行分层。对于荷兰情况,成本和获得的生命年(LYG)的贴现率为 1.5%和 4%;对于国际比较,贴现率为 3%和 3%。应用了 20,000 欧元/LYG 的阈值。

结果

所有强化策略均显示出更多的 BC 检出和 LYG,降低了 BC 死亡率,并增加了假阳性。与每年乳房 X 光检查相比,BRCA1 突变携带者的荷兰贴现 ICER 为每年强化策略 1 每 LYG 38,000 欧元,BRCA2 突变携带者为每 LYG 18,000 欧元。与该策略相比,进一步强化的策略显示出 ICER 高于阈值。在国际贴现率下,所有强化策略的 ICER 均高于阈值。

结论

在这三种替代策略中,只有 BRCA2 突变携带者和 60-75 岁致密乳腺的每年交替 MRI 和乳房 X 光检查策略相对于每年乳房 X 光检查具有成本效益。对于 BRCA1 突变携带者,与最佳策略相比,没有一种替代策略具有成本效益。

相似文献

1
Should women with a BRCA1/2 mutation aged 60 and older be offered intensified breast cancer screening? - A cost-effectiveness analysis.BRCA1/2 基因突变且年龄在 60 岁及以上的女性是否应接受强化乳腺癌筛查?-成本效益分析。
Breast. 2019 Jun;45:82-88. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2019.03.004. Epub 2019 Mar 12.
2
Which screening strategy should be offered to women with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations? A simulation of comparative cost-effectiveness.携带有 BRCA1 或 BRCA2 突变的女性应采用何种筛查策略?一种比较成本效益的模拟研究。
Br J Cancer. 2013 Apr 30;108(8):1579-86. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2013.149. Epub 2013 Apr 11.
3
Cost-effectiveness of Breast Cancer Screening With Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Women at Familial Risk.家族性乳腺癌风险女性的磁共振成像乳腺癌筛查的成本效益分析。
JAMA Oncol. 2020 Sep 1;6(9):1381-1389. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.2922.
4
Cost-effectiveness of screening BRCA1/2 mutation carriers with breast magnetic resonance imaging.采用乳腺磁共振成像对BRCA1/2突变携带者进行筛查的成本效益分析。
JAMA. 2006 May 24;295(20):2374-84. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.20.2374.
5
Cost-effectiveness of alternating magnetic resonance imaging and digital mammography screening in BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutation carriers.BRCA1 和 BRCA2 基因突变携带者中交替磁共振成像和数字乳房 X 线摄影筛查的成本效益。
Cancer. 2013 Mar 15;119(6):1266-76. doi: 10.1002/cncr.27864. Epub 2012 Nov 26.
6
Cost-effectiveness of screening women with familial risk for breast cancer with magnetic resonance imaging.家族性乳腺癌风险女性的磁共振成像筛查的成本效益。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013 Sep 4;105(17):1314-21. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djt203. Epub 2013 Aug 12.
7
Cost-effectiveness of MRI for breast cancer screening in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers.BRCA1/2 基因突变携带者乳腺癌筛查中 MRI 的成本效益分析。
BMC Cancer. 2013 Jul 10;13:339. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-13-339.
8
Cost-effectiveness of screening with contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging vs X-ray mammography of women at a high familial risk of breast cancer.对比增强磁共振成像与X线乳腺钼靶对乳腺癌高家族风险女性进行筛查的成本效益
Br J Cancer. 2006 Oct 9;95(7):801-10. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603356.
9
Cost Effectiveness of Risk-Reducing Mastectomy versus Surveillance in BRCA Mutation Carriers with a History of Ovarian Cancer.BRCA 基因突变携带者伴卵巢癌病史行预防性乳房切除术与监测的成本效果比较。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2017 Oct;24(11):3116-3123. doi: 10.1245/s10434-017-5995-z. Epub 2017 Jul 11.
10
Cost-effectiveness of digital mammography screening before the age of 50 in The Netherlands.荷兰50岁之前数字乳腺钼靶筛查的成本效益。
Int J Cancer. 2015 Oct 15;137(8):1990-9. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29572. Epub 2015 May 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Economic evaluation of breast MRI in screening - a systematic review and basic approach to cost-effectiveness analyses.乳腺磁共振成像筛查的经济学评估——系统评价及成本效益分析的基本方法
Front Oncol. 2023 Dec 7;13:1292268. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1292268. eCollection 2023.
2
The Japanese breast cancer society clinical practice guidelines for breast cancer screening and diagnosis, 2022 edition.日本乳腺癌学会乳腺癌筛查和诊断临床实践指南,2022 年版。
Breast Cancer. 2024 Mar;31(2):157-164. doi: 10.1007/s12282-023-01521-x. Epub 2023 Nov 16.
3
A Primer to Cost-Effectiveness Analysis in Breast Cancer Imaging: A Review of the Literature.
乳腺癌影像学成本效益分析入门:文献综述
Cureus. 2022 Aug 24;14(8):e28356. doi: 10.7759/cureus.28356. eCollection 2022 Aug.
4
Downstream Mammary and Extramammary Cascade Services and Spending Following Screening Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging vs Mammography Among Commercially Insured Women.商业保险女性接受筛查性乳腺磁共振成像与乳腺 X 线摄影后下游乳腺和乳腺外级联服务及支出。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Apr 1;5(4):e227234. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.7234.
5
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Imaging Modalities for Breast Cancer Surveillance Among Mutation Carriers: A Systematic Review.乳腺癌监测成像方式在突变携带者中的成本效益分析:一项系统评价。
Front Oncol. 2022 Jan 10;11:763161. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.763161. eCollection 2021.
6
Systematic Review of the Cost Effectiveness of Breast Cancer Prevention, Screening, and Treatment Interventions.乳腺癌预防、筛查及治疗干预措施成本效益的系统评价
J Clin Oncol. 2020 Feb 1;38(4):332-350. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.01525. Epub 2019 Dec 5.
7
Breast Cancer Screening in High-Risk Women: Is MRI Alone Enough?高危女性的乳腺癌筛查:仅用磁共振成像(MRI)足够吗?
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2020 Feb 1;112(2):121-122. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djz130.