• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The evaluation of the efficacy and safety of non-invasive neurally adjusted ventilatory assist in combination with INtubation-SURfactant-Extubation technique for infants at 28 to 33 weeks of gestation with respiratory distress syndrome.对妊娠28至33周患有呼吸窘迫综合征的婴儿,采用无创神经调节通气辅助联合插管-表面活性剂-拔管技术的疗效和安全性评估。
SAGE Open Med. 2019 Mar 15;7:2050312119838417. doi: 10.1177/2050312119838417. eCollection 2019.
2
Less invasive surfactant administration versus endotracheal surfactant instillation followed by limited peak pressure ventilation in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome in China: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.经鼻给予肺表面活性物质与气管内给予肺表面活性物质后行小潮气量通气治疗中国呼吸窘迫综合征早产儿的随机对照试验研究方案
Trials. 2020 Jun 11;21(1):516. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04390-3.
3
Early surfactant administration with brief ventilation vs selective surfactant and continued mechanical ventilation for preterm infants with or at risk for respiratory distress syndrome.早期使用表面活性剂并短暂通气与选择性使用表面活性剂及持续机械通气治疗患有或有呼吸窘迫综合征风险的早产儿的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004(3):CD003063. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003063.pub2.
4
Non-invasive neurally adjusted ventilatory assist versus nasal intermittent positive-pressure ventilation in preterm infants born before 30 weeks' gestation.孕30周前出生的早产儿中,无创神经调节通气辅助与经鼻间歇正压通气的比较。
Pediatr Int. 2018 Oct;60(10):957-961. doi: 10.1111/ped.13680.
5
Early surfactant administration with brief ventilation vs selective surfactant and continued mechanical ventilation for preterm infants with or at risk for RDS.对于患有呼吸窘迫综合征(RDS)或有RDS风险的早产儿,早期给予表面活性剂并进行短暂通气与选择性给予表面活性剂及持续机械通气的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002(2):CD003063. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003063.
6
7
Less Invasive Surfactant Administration (LISA) vs. Intubation Surfactant Extubation (InSurE) in Preterm Infants with Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.经鼻持续气道正压通气与肺表面活性物质治疗早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征的随机对照研究
J Trop Pediatr. 2021 Aug 27;67(4). doi: 10.1093/tropej/fmab086.
8
The influence of the technique of surfactant administration (LISA vs INSURE) on the outcomes of respiratory distress syndrome treatment in preterm infants.表面活性剂给药技术(肺内滴注法与气管插管-肺表面活性物质给药法)对早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征治疗结局的影响。
Dev Period Med. 2019;23(3):163-171. doi: 10.34763/devperiodmed.20192303.163171.
9
Surfactant administration without intubation in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome--our experiences.未插管给予表面活性剂治疗呼吸窘迫综合征早产儿——我们的经验
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2015 Jul;28(10):1161-4. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2014.947571. Epub 2014 Aug 14.
10
Nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) or noninvasive neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NIV-NAVA) for preterm infants with respiratory distress after birth: A randomized controlled trial.经鼻持续气道正压通气(NCPAP)或无创神经调节通气辅助(NIV-NAVA)治疗出生后呼吸窘迫的早产儿:一项随机对照试验。
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2019 Nov;54(11):1704-1711. doi: 10.1002/ppul.24466. Epub 2019 Aug 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Non-invasive neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NIV-NAVA) in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU): an Australian NICU experience.澳大利亚新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)使用非侵入性神经调节通气辅助(NIV-NAVA):一项临床经验。
BMC Pediatr. 2024 Aug 9;24(1):514. doi: 10.1186/s12887-024-04981-y.

本文引用的文献

1
Neural breathing patterns in preterm newborns supported with non-invasive neurally adjusted ventilatory assist.非侵入性神经调节通气辅助支持下的早产儿神经呼吸模式。
J Perinatol. 2018 Sep;38(9):1235-1241. doi: 10.1038/s41372-018-0152-5. Epub 2018 Jun 18.
2
Feasibility and physiological effects of noninvasive neurally adjusted ventilatory assist in preterm infants.非侵入性神经调节通气辅助在早产儿中的可行性和生理效应。
Pediatr Res. 2017 Oct;82(4):650-657. doi: 10.1038/pr.2017.100. Epub 2017 Jul 12.
3
Association of Noninvasive Ventilation Strategies With Mortality and Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia Among Preterm Infants: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.非侵入性通气策略与早产儿死亡率和支气管肺发育不良的相关性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA. 2016 Aug 9;316(6):611-24. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.10708.
4
Incidence and Outcome of CPAP Failure in Preterm Infants.早产儿持续气道正压通气失败的发生率及结局
Pediatrics. 2016 Jul;138(1). doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-3985.
5
Non-invasive ventilation with neurally adjusted ventilatory assist in newborns.新生儿神经调节通气辅助的无创通气
Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016 Jun;21(3):154-61. doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2016.01.006. Epub 2016 Feb 16.
6
Non-invasive neurally adjusted ventilatory assist in preterm infants: a randomised phase II crossover trial.非侵入性神经调节通气辅助治疗早产儿:一项随机 II 期交叉试验。
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2015 Nov;100(6):F507-13. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2014-308057. Epub 2015 Jul 15.
7
A prospective, randomized, controlled study of NIPPV versus nCPAP in preterm and term infants with respiratory distress syndrome.一项关于无创正压通气(NIPPV)与鼻塞持续气道正压通气(nCPAP)用于早产和足月呼吸窘迫综合征婴儿的前瞻性、随机对照研究。
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2014 Jul;49(7):673-8. doi: 10.1002/ppul.22883. Epub 2013 Sep 4.
8
Flow-synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation for infants <32 weeks' gestation with respiratory distress syndrome.对孕周小于32周的呼吸窘迫综合征婴儿采用流量同步经鼻间歇正压通气治疗
Crit Care Res Pract. 2012;2012:301818. doi: 10.1155/2012/301818. Epub 2012 Nov 27.
9
Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation after surfactant treatment for respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants <30 weeks' gestation: a randomized, controlled trial.经表面活性物质治疗的早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征(胎龄<30 周)行鼻间歇正压通气:一项随机对照试验。
J Perinatol. 2012 May;32(5):336-43. doi: 10.1038/jp.2012.1. Epub 2012 Feb 2.
10
Effects of synchronization during nasal ventilation in clinically stable preterm infants.经鼻通气时同步化对临床稳定早产儿的影响。
Pediatr Res. 2011 Jan;69(1):84-9. doi: 10.1203/PDR.0b013e3181ff6770.

对妊娠28至33周患有呼吸窘迫综合征的婴儿,采用无创神经调节通气辅助联合插管-表面活性剂-拔管技术的疗效和安全性评估。

The evaluation of the efficacy and safety of non-invasive neurally adjusted ventilatory assist in combination with INtubation-SURfactant-Extubation technique for infants at 28 to 33 weeks of gestation with respiratory distress syndrome.

作者信息

Miyahara Jun, Sugiura Hiroshi, Ohki Shigeru

机构信息

Department of Neonatology, Seirei Hamamatsu General Hospital, Hamamatsu, Japan.

出版信息

SAGE Open Med. 2019 Mar 15;7:2050312119838417. doi: 10.1177/2050312119838417. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.1177/2050312119838417
PMID:30906554
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6421598/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of non-invasive neurally adjusted ventilatory assist used after INtubation-SURfactant-Extubation in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective observational study that included 15 inborn preterm infants at 28 (0/7) to 33 (6/7) weeks of gestation with respiratory distress syndrome in the period from April 2017 to October 2018. After INtubation-SURfactant-Extubation, infants underwent non-invasive neurally adjusted ventilatory assist. INtubation-SURfactant-Extubation failure was defined as follows: fraction of inspired oxygen requirement >0.4, respiratory acidosis, and severe apnea within 5 days after surfactant administration.

RESULTS

Two of the 15 (13.3%) infants showed INtubation-SURfactant-Extubation failure and required mechanical ventilation. No infants experienced any major complications such as pneumothorax, patent ductus arteriosus ligation, severe intraventricular hemorrhage, periventricular leukomalacia, retinopathy of prematurity, or death.

CONCLUSION

The rate of INtubation-SURfactant-Extubation failure when non-invasive neurally adjusted ventilatory assist was used after INtubation-SURfactant-Extubation for preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome was 13.3%. Non-invasive neurally adjusted ventilatory assist can be safely performed without severe complications for preterm infants soon after birth.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估在气管插管-使用表面活性剂-拔管后,对患有呼吸窘迫综合征的早产儿使用无创神经调节通气辅助的疗效和安全性。

方法

我们进行了一项前瞻性观察性研究,纳入了2017年4月至2018年10月期间15例胎龄28(0/7)至33(6/7)周、患有呼吸窘迫综合征的早产儿。在气管插管-使用表面活性剂-拔管后,对婴儿进行无创神经调节通气辅助。气管插管-使用表面活性剂-拔管失败的定义如下:在给予表面活性剂后5天内,吸入氧分数需求>0.4、呼吸性酸中毒和严重呼吸暂停。

结果

15例婴儿中有2例(13.3%)出现气管插管-使用表面活性剂-拔管失败,需要机械通气。没有婴儿发生任何重大并发症,如气胸、动脉导管未闭结扎、重度脑室内出血、脑室周围白质软化、早产儿视网膜病变或死亡。

结论

对于患有呼吸窘迫综合征的早产儿,在气管插管-使用表面活性剂-拔管后使用无创神经调节通气辅助时,气管插管-使用表面活性剂-拔管失败率为13.3%。出生后不久对早产儿安全实施无创神经调节通气辅助不会出现严重并发症。