• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

欧洲医院向全电子系统的转型:信息技术安全与隐私措施是否与之同步?

European Hospitals' Transition Toward Fully Electronic-Based Systems: Do Information Technology Security and Privacy Practices Follow?

作者信息

Uwizeyemungu Sylvestre, Poba-Nzaou Placide, Cantinotti Michael

机构信息

Accounting Department, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, QC, Canada.

Department of Organization and Human Resources Management, École des Sciences de la Gestion, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.

出版信息

JMIR Med Inform. 2019 Mar 25;7(1):e11211. doi: 10.2196/11211.

DOI:10.2196/11211
PMID:30907732
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6452275/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Traditionally, health information has been mainly kept in paper-based records. This has deeply changed throughout approximately the last three decades with the widespread use of multiple health information technologies. The digitization of health care systems contributes to improving health care delivery. However, it also exposes health records to security and privacy breaches inherently related to information technology (IT). Thus, health care organizations willing to leverage IT for improved health care delivery need to put in place IT security and privacy measures consistent with their use of IT resources.

OBJECTIVE

In this study, 2 main objectives are pursued: (1) to assess the state of the implementation of IT security and privacy practices in European hospitals and (2) to assess to what extent these hospitals enhance their IT security and privacy practices as they move from paper-based systems toward fully electronic-based systems.

METHODS

Drawing on data from the European Commission electronic health survey, we performed a cluster analysis based on IT security and privacy practices implemented in 1723 European hospitals. We also developed an IT security index, a compounded measure of implemented IT security and privacy practices, and compared it with the hospitals' level in their transition from a paper-based system toward a fully electronic-based system.

RESULTS

A total of 3 clearly distinct patterns of health IT-related security and privacy practices were unveiled. These patterns, as well as the IT security index, indicate that most of the sampled hospitals (70.2%) failed to implement basic security and privacy measures consistent with their digitization level.

CONCLUSIONS

Even though, on average, the most electronically advanced hospitals display a higher IT security index than hospitals where the paper system still dominates, surprisingly, it appears that the enhancement of IT security and privacy practices as the health information digitization advances in European hospitals is neither systematic nor strong enough regarding the IT-security requirements. This study will contribute to raising awareness among hospitals' managers as to the importance of enhancing their IT security and privacy measures so that they can keep up with the security threats inherently related to the digitization of health care organizations.

摘要

背景

传统上,健康信息主要保存在纸质记录中。在过去大约三十年里,随着多种健康信息技术的广泛使用,这种情况发生了深刻变化。医疗保健系统的数字化有助于改善医疗服务的提供。然而,它也使健康记录面临与信息技术(IT)固有相关的安全和隐私泄露风险。因此,希望利用信息技术改善医疗服务的医疗机构需要制定与其IT资源使用相一致的IT安全和隐私措施。

目的

本研究追求两个主要目标:(1)评估欧洲医院IT安全和隐私实践的实施状况;(2)评估这些医院在从纸质系统向完全电子化系统转变过程中,在多大程度上加强其IT安全和隐私实践。

方法

利用欧盟委员会电子健康调查的数据,我们基于1723家欧洲医院实施的IT安全和隐私实践进行了聚类分析。我们还开发了一个IT安全指数,这是对已实施的IT安全和隐私实践的综合衡量,并将其与医院从纸质系统向完全电子化系统转变的水平进行比较。

结果

共揭示了3种明显不同的与健康IT相关的安全和隐私实践模式。这些模式以及IT安全指数表明,大多数抽样医院(70.2%)未能实施与其数字化水平相一致的基本安全和隐私措施。

结论

尽管平均而言,电子信息化程度最高的医院的IT安全指数高于纸质系统仍占主导的医院,但令人惊讶的是,随着欧洲医院健康信息数字化的推进,在IT安全要求方面,IT安全和隐私实践的增强既不系统也不够有力。本研究将有助于提高医院管理者对加强其IT安全和隐私措施重要性的认识,以便他们能够应对与医疗保健机构数字化固有相关的安全威胁。

相似文献

1
European Hospitals' Transition Toward Fully Electronic-Based Systems: Do Information Technology Security and Privacy Practices Follow?欧洲医院向全电子系统的转型:信息技术安全与隐私措施是否与之同步?
JMIR Med Inform. 2019 Mar 25;7(1):e11211. doi: 10.2196/11211.
2
Do data security measures, privacy regulations, and communication standards impact the interoperability of patient health information? A cross-country investigation.数据安全措施、隐私法规和通信标准是否会影响患者健康信息的互操作性?一项跨国调查。
Int J Med Inform. 2021 Apr;148:104401. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2021.104401. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
3
An investigation of the status and maturity of hospitals' health information governance in Victoria, Australia.澳大利亚维多利亚州医院健康信息治理的现状与成熟度调查。
Health Inf Manag. 2022 May;51(2):89-97. doi: 10.1177/1833358320938309. Epub 2020 Jul 14.
4
Privacy, confidentiality, and security in information systems of state health agencies.州卫生机构信息系统中的隐私、保密与安全。
Am J Prev Med. 1999 May;16(4):351-8. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(99)00024-0.
5
The role of health care experience and consumer information efficacy in shaping privacy and security perceptions of medical records: national consumer survey results.医疗保健体验和消费者信息效能在塑造病历隐私和安全认知方面的作用:全国消费者调查结果。
JMIR Med Inform. 2015 Apr 2;3(2):e14. doi: 10.2196/medinform.3238.
6
Assessing the impact of health information exchange on hospital data breach risk.评估健康信息交换对医院数据泄露风险的影响。
Int J Med Inform. 2023 Sep;177:105149. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2023.105149. Epub 2023 Jul 8.
7
Working towards a national health information system in Australia.致力于建立澳大利亚国家卫生信息系统。
Medinfo. 1995;8 Pt 2:1633.
8
Patient and public views about the security and privacy of Electronic Health Records (EHRs) in the UK: results from a mixed methods study.英国患者及公众对电子健康记录(EHRs)安全性和隐私性的看法:一项混合方法研究的结果
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2015 Oct 14;15:86. doi: 10.1186/s12911-015-0202-2.
9
Trust Me, I'm a Doctor: Examining Changes in How Privacy Concerns Affect Patient Withholding Behavior.相信我,我是医生:审视隐私担忧影响患者隐瞒行为方式的变化。
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Jan 4;19(1):e2. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6296.
10
The Potential of Blockchain Technology for Health Information Exchange: Experimental Study From Patients' Perspectives.区块链技术在健康信息交换中的潜力:基于患者视角的实验研究
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Jun 20;21(6):e14184. doi: 10.2196/14184.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing the maturity and performance of the IT function in acute-care hospitals: a configurational view.评估急症医院中信息技术职能的成熟度和绩效:一种组态视角
Health Syst (Basingstoke). 2022 May 26;13(1):11-23. doi: 10.1080/20476965.2022.2075797. eCollection 2024.
2
AI-Enhanced Healthcare: Not a new Paradigm for Informed Consent.人工智能增强型医疗保健:并非知情同意的新范式。
J Bioeth Inq. 2024 Sep;21(3):475-489. doi: 10.1007/s11673-023-10320-0. Epub 2024 Feb 1.
3
Attitudes of Covid-19 patients toward sharing their health data: A survey-based study to understand security and privacy concerns.

本文引用的文献

1
Cybersecurity in healthcare: A narrative review of trends, threats and ways forward.医疗保健中的网络安全:趋势、威胁及未来发展方向的叙述性综述。
Maturitas. 2018 Jul;113:48-52. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2018.04.008. Epub 2018 Apr 22.
2
Possible Sources of Bias in Primary Care Electronic Health Record Data Use and Reuse.基层医疗电子健康记录数据使用与再利用中可能存在的偏差来源。
J Med Internet Res. 2018 May 29;20(5):e185. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9134.
3
The Effectiveness of Health Care Information Technologies: Evaluation of Trust, Security Beliefs, and Privacy as Determinants of Health Care Outcomes.
新冠病毒肺炎患者对共享其健康数据的态度:一项基于调查的研究,以了解安全和隐私问题。
Health Sci Rep. 2023 Feb 27;6(3):e1132. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.1132. eCollection 2023 Mar.
4
Variation in approaches to antimicrobial use surveillance in high-income secondary care settings: a systematic review.高收入二级保健环境中抗菌药物使用监测方法的差异:系统评价。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2021 Jul 15;76(8):1969-1977. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkab125.
5
Good News and Bad News About Incentives to Violate the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA): Scenario-Based Questionnaire Study.违反《健康保险流通与责任法案》(HIPAA)相关激励措施的好坏消息:基于场景的问卷调查研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2020 Jul 20;8(7):e15880. doi: 10.2196/15880.
6
Why Employees (Still) Click on Phishing Links: Investigation in Hospitals.为何员工(仍然)会点击网络钓鱼链接:医院调查
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jan 23;22(1):e16775. doi: 10.2196/16775.
医疗信息技术的有效性:对信任、安全信念及隐私作为医疗结果决定因素的评估
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Apr 11;20(4):e107. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9014.
4
Embracing uncertainty, managing complexity: applying complexity thinking principles to transformation efforts in healthcare systems.拥抱不确定性,管理复杂性:将复杂性思维原则应用于医疗保健系统的变革努力。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Mar 21;18(1):192. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-2994-0.
5
Data breach locations, types, and associated characteristics among US hospitals.美国医院数据泄露地点、类型及相关特征。
Am J Manag Care. 2018 Feb;24(2):78-84.
6
Health Information Technology Continues to Show Positive Effect on Medical Outcomes: Systematic Review.健康信息技术持续对医疗结果显示出积极影响:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Feb 5;20(2):e41. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8793.
7
Cybersecurity in healthcare: A systematic review of modern threats and trends.医疗保健领域的网络安全:对现代威胁与趋势的系统综述
Technol Health Care. 2017;25(1):1-10. doi: 10.3233/THC-161263.
8
Patient Perspectives on Sharing Anonymized Personal Health Data Using a Digital System for Dynamic Consent and Research Feedback: A Qualitative Study.患者对使用数字系统进行动态同意和研究反馈来共享匿名个人健康数据的看法:一项定性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Apr 15;18(4):e66. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5011.
9
Unaddressed privacy risks in accredited health and wellness apps: a cross-sectional systematic assessment.经认证的健康与健身应用中未解决的隐私风险:一项横断面系统评估。
BMC Med. 2015 Sep 7;13:214. doi: 10.1186/s12916-015-0444-y.
10
Electronic Health Records and the Quest to Achieve the "Triple Aim".电子健康记录与实现“三重目标”的探索
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 May 12;65(18):1973-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.03.038.