• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

风险分析指数的重新校准和外部验证:一种手术脆弱性评估工具。

Recalibration and External Validation of the Risk Analysis Index: A Surgical Frailty Assessment Tool.

机构信息

Division of Vascular Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA.

Center for Innovation to Implementation, VA Palo Alto Healthcare System, Palo Alto, CA.

出版信息

Ann Surg. 2020 Dec;272(6):996-1005. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003276.

DOI:10.1097/SLA.0000000000003276
PMID:30907757
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8785437/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE AND BACKGROUND

The Risk Analysis Index (RAI) predicts 30-, 180-, and 365-day mortality based on variables constitutive of frailty. Initially validated, in a single-center Veteran hospital, we sought to improve model performance by recalibrating the RAI in a large, veteran surgical registry, and to externally validate it in both a national surgical registry and a cohort of surgical patients for whom RAI was measured prospectively before surgery.

METHODS

The RAI was recalibrated among development and confirmation samples within the Veterans Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Program (VASQIP; 2010-2014; N = 480,731) including major, elective noncardiac surgery patients to create the revised RAI (RAI-rev), comparing discrimination and calibration. The model was tested externally in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program dataset (NSQIP; 2005-2014; N = 1,391,785), and in a prospectively collected cohort from the Nebraska Western Iowa Health Care System VA (NWIHCS; N = 6,856).

RESULTS

Recalibrating the RAI significantly improved discrimination for 30-day [c = 0.84-0.86], 180-day [c = 0.81-0.84], and 365-day mortality [c = 0.78-0.82] (P < 0.001 for all) in VASQIP. The RAI-rev also had markedly better calibration (median absolute difference between observed and predicted 180-day mortality: decreased from 8.45% to 1.23%). RAI-rev was highly predictive of 30-day mortality (c = 0.87) in external validation with excellent calibration (median absolute difference between observed and predicted 30-day mortality: 0.6%). The discrimination was highly robust in men (c = 0.85) and women (c = 0.89). Discrimination also improved in the prospectively measured cohort from NWIHCS for 180-day mortality [c = 0.77 to 0.80] (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The RAI-rev has improved discrimination and calibration as a frailty-screening tool in surgical patients. It has robust external validity in men and women across a wide range of surgical settings and available for immediate implementation for risk assessment and counseling in preoperative patients.

摘要

目的和背景

风险分析指数(RAI)根据构成脆弱性的变量预测 30 天、180 天和 365 天的死亡率。最初在一家退伍军人单中心医院进行了验证,我们试图通过在退伍军人事务部手术质量改进计划(VASQIP;2010-2014 年)中的大型退伍军人手术登记处重新校准 RAI 来提高模型性能,并在全国手术登记处和前瞻性测量手术前 RAI 的手术患者队列中对其进行外部验证。

方法

在 Veterans Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Program(VASQIP;2010-2014 年)的开发和验证样本中重新校准 RAI,包括主要的、择期非心脏手术患者,以创建修订后的 RAI(RAI-rev),比较其区分度和校准度。该模型在 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program 数据集(NSQIP;2005-2014 年)中进行了外部测试,并在 Nebraska Western Iowa Health Care System VA(NWIHCS;6856 名)前瞻性收集的队列中进行了测试。

结果

重新校准 RAI 显著提高了 VASQIP 中 30 天(c = 0.84-0.86)、180 天(c = 0.81-0.84)和 365 天死亡率(c = 0.78-0.82)的区分度(所有 P < 0.001)。RAI-rev 的校准也明显更好(观察到的 180 天死亡率和预测死亡率之间的中位数绝对差异:从 8.45%下降到 1.23%)。RAI-rev 在外部验证中对 30 天死亡率具有高度预测性(c = 0.87),且校准度极佳(观察到的 30 天死亡率和预测死亡率之间的中位数绝对差异:0.6%)。该区分度在男性(c = 0.85)和女性(c = 0.89)中均高度稳健。在 NWIHCS 的前瞻性测量队列中,180 天死亡率的区分度也有所提高[c = 0.77 至 0.80](P < 0.001)。

结论

RAI-rev 作为一种用于手术患者的脆弱性筛查工具,其区分度和校准度得到了改善。它在广泛的手术环境中具有强大的外部有效性,适用于男性和女性,并且可立即用于术前患者的风险评估和咨询。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98f6/8785437/8b61079c7688/nihms-1618566-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98f6/8785437/a907568062f2/nihms-1618566-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98f6/8785437/8b61079c7688/nihms-1618566-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98f6/8785437/a907568062f2/nihms-1618566-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98f6/8785437/8b61079c7688/nihms-1618566-f0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Recalibration and External Validation of the Risk Analysis Index: A Surgical Frailty Assessment Tool.风险分析指数的重新校准和外部验证:一种手术脆弱性评估工具。
Ann Surg. 2020 Dec;272(6):996-1005. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003276.
2
Development and Initial Validation of the Risk Analysis Index for Measuring Frailty in Surgical Populations.手术人群中测量衰弱的风险分析指数的开发与初步验证
JAMA Surg. 2017 Feb 1;152(2):175-182. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.4202.
3
Thirty-day outcomes for suboccipital decompression in adults with Chiari malformation type I: a frailty-driven perspective from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.成人 Chiari 畸形 I 型患者枕下减压术的 30 天结局:美国外科医师学会国家手术质量改进计划的脆弱性驱动视角。
Neurosurg Focus. 2023 Mar;54(3):E6. doi: 10.3171/2022.12.FOCUS22629.
4
Frailty measured by risk analysis index and adverse discharge outcomes after adult spine deformity surgery: analysis of 3104 patients from a prospective surgical registry (2011-2020).通过风险分析指数衡量的衰弱与成人脊柱畸形手术后的不良出院结局:对来自前瞻性手术登记处(2011 - 2020年)的3104例患者的分析
Spine J. 2023 May;23(5):739-745. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.12.014. Epub 2022 Dec 24.
5
Association Between Patient Frailty and Postoperative Mortality Across Multiple Noncardiac Surgical Specialties.患者虚弱与多种非心脏外科手术后死亡率之间的关联。
JAMA Surg. 2021 Jan 1;156(1):e205152. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.5152. Epub 2021 Jan 13.
6
A Retrospective Cohort Study to Evaluate Adding Biomarkers to the Risk Analysis Index of Frailty.一项评估将生物标志物添加到衰弱风险分析指标中的回顾性队列研究。
J Surg Res. 2023 Dec;292:130-136. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2023.07.034. Epub 2023 Aug 22.
7
A Bayesian Comparison of Frailty Instruments in Noncardiac Surgery: A Cohort Study.贝叶斯比较非心脏手术中的虚弱指标:一项队列研究。
Anesth Analg. 2021 Aug 1;133(2):366-373. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000005290.
8
Association of a Frailty Screening Initiative With Postoperative Survival at 30, 180, and 365 Days.一项衰弱筛查计划与术后30天、180天和365天生存率的关联
JAMA Surg. 2017 Mar 1;152(3):233-240. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.4219.
9
Assessment of the Risk Analysis Index for Prediction of Mortality, Major Complications, and Length of Stay in Patients who Underwent Vascular Surgery.评估血管手术患者死亡率、主要并发症及住院时间预测的风险分析指标
Ann Vasc Surg. 2020 Jul;66:442-453. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2020.01.015. Epub 2020 Jan 11.
10
Frailty Measured by the Risk Analysis Index Predicts Nonhome Discharge and Mortality After Resection in Refractory Epilepsy: Analysis of 1236 Patients From a Prospective Surgical Registry, 2012 to 2020.风险分析指数评估的衰弱情况可预测难治性癫痫患者切除术后非居家出院和死亡率:2012 年至 2020 年前瞻性手术登记处 1236 例患者的分析。
Neurosurgery. 2023 Aug 1;93(2):267-273. doi: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002439. Epub 2023 Feb 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Trajectories of Recovery after Intravenous propofol versus inhaled VolatilE anaesthesia (THRIVE) randomised controlled trial in the USA: A protocol.美国静脉注射丙泊酚与吸入挥发性麻醉后恢复轨迹(THRIVE)随机对照试验:方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Sep 14;15(9):e103836. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103836.
2
Modified 5-Item Frailty Index and Postoperative Outcomes Following Parotidectomy for Malignancy.改良的5项衰弱指数与恶性肿瘤腮腺切除术后的预后
Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2025 Sep 13;10(5):e70220. doi: 10.1002/lio2.70220. eCollection 2025 Oct.
3
Predictive value of the risk analysis index for 30-day mortality following surgical management of thoracolumbar vertebral body fractures.

本文引用的文献

1
Risk Calculators and Decision Aids Are Not Enough for Shared Decision Making.风险计算器和决策辅助工具对于共同决策而言并不足够。
JAMA Surg. 2019 Jan 1;154(1):3-4. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.2446.
2
New 5-Factor Modified Frailty Index Using American College of Surgeons NSQIP Data.基于美国外科医师学会 NSQIP 数据的新 5 因素修正衰弱指数。
J Am Coll Surg. 2018 Feb;226(2):173-181.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.11.005. Epub 2017 Nov 16.
3
Optimizing Surgical Quality Datasets to Care for Older Adults: Lessons from the American College of Surgeons NSQIP Geriatric Surgery Pilot.
胸腰椎椎体骨折手术治疗后30天死亡率风险分析指标的预测价值
Eur Spine J. 2025 Aug 25. doi: 10.1007/s00586-025-09289-8.
4
Composite RAI, Malnutrition, and Anemia Model Superiorly Predicts 30-Day Morbidity and Mortality After Surgery for Adult Spinal Deformity.综合放射性碘摄取、营养不良和贫血模型能更好地预测成人脊柱畸形手术后30天的发病率和死亡率。
J Clin Med. 2025 Jul 30;14(15):5379. doi: 10.3390/jcm14155379.
5
Patients with History of Metastasis Have Differing Surgical Indications and Increased Perioperative Risk Following Revision Total Joint Arthroplasty.有转移病史的患者在翻修全关节置换术后有不同的手术指征且围手术期风险增加。
Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2025 Aug 6;16:21514593251366161. doi: 10.1177/21514593251366161. eCollection 2025.
6
Does weightbearing status impact mortality and other complications in hip fracture patients when accounting for frailty?在考虑到虚弱因素时,负重状态是否会影响髋部骨折患者的死亡率和其他并发症?
Bone Jt Open. 2025 Jul 8;6(7):785-795. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.67.BJO-2025-0059.R1.
7
Longitudinal Financial Toxicity and Quality of Life in Head and Neck Cancer.头颈部癌的纵向财务毒性与生活质量
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2025 Jun 12. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2025.1313.
8
Utility of Revised Risk Analysis Index as a Predictor of Mortality and Morbidity in Orthopaedic Trauma.修订后的风险分析指数在预测骨科创伤死亡率和发病率方面的效用
J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2025 Jun 3;9(6). doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-25-00086. eCollection 2025 Jun 1.
9
Neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage is not associated with adverse outcomes following elective spine surgery in older Veterans.邻里社会经济劣势与老年退伍军人择期脊柱手术后的不良结局无关。
N Am Spine Soc J. 2025 Apr 17;22:100611. doi: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2025.100611. eCollection 2025 Jun.
10
The risk analysis index as a predictor of 30-day mortality for elderly obese patients undergoing elective total joint arthroplasty.风险分析指标作为择期全关节置换术老年肥胖患者30天死亡率的预测指标。
J Orthop. 2025 May 5;65:178-184. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2025.05.009. eCollection 2025 Jul.
优化手术质量数据集以关爱老年人:来自美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划老年外科手术试点项目的经验教训。
J Am Coll Surg. 2017 Dec;225(6):702-712.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.08.012. Epub 2017 Oct 17.
4
Agreement Between 35 Published Frailty Scores in the General Population.一般人群中35个已发表的衰弱评分之间的一致性。
Am J Epidemiol. 2017 Aug 15;186(4):420-434. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwx061.
5
Frailty-Going From Measurement to Action.衰弱——从测量到行动
JAMA Surg. 2017 Aug 1;152(8):757-758. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.1050.
6
Association of a Frailty Screening Initiative With Postoperative Survival at 30, 180, and 365 Days.一项衰弱筛查计划与术后30天、180天和365天生存率的关联
JAMA Surg. 2017 Mar 1;152(3):233-240. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.4219.
7
A Call for Frailty Screening in the Preoperative Setting.术前进行衰弱筛查的呼吁。
JAMA Surg. 2017 Mar 1;152(3):240-241. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.4256.
8
Development and Initial Validation of the Risk Analysis Index for Measuring Frailty in Surgical Populations.手术人群中测量衰弱的风险分析指数的开发与初步验证
JAMA Surg. 2017 Feb 1;152(2):175-182. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.4202.
9
Use of the Modified Frailty Index in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Improvement Program Database: Highlighting the Problem of Missing Data.改良虚弱指数在美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划数据库中的应用:凸显数据缺失问题
JAMA Surg. 2017 Feb 1;152(2):205-207. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.3479.
10
External validation of the Hospital-patient One-year Mortality Risk (HOMR) model for predicting death within 1 year after hospital admission.用于预测住院后1年内死亡情况的医院-患者一年死亡率风险(HOMR)模型的外部验证
CMAJ. 2015 Jul 14;187(10):725-733. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.150209. Epub 2015 Jun 8.