• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高、中、低动员力减轻髋骨关节炎患者疼痛和改善身体功能的比较:一项随机对照试验的二次分析。

Comparison of high, medium and low mobilization forces for reducing pain and improving physical function in patients with hip osteoarthritis: Secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Physiatrist and Nursery, Faculty of Heath Sciences, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.

Department of Surgery, Ophthalmology and Physiotherapy, University of Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain.

出版信息

Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2019 Jun;41:43-48. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2019.03.007. Epub 2019 Mar 21.

DOI:10.1016/j.msksp.2019.03.007
PMID:30909110
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Long-axis distraction mobilization (LADM) of the hip has been shown to reduce pain and improve physical function in hip osteoarthritis (OA). The optimal intensity of mobilization force necessary to reduce pain and improve physical function is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effects on pain and physical function of three different intensities of LADM mobilization force in hip OA patients.

DESIGN

Randomized controlled trial.

METHODS

Sixty patients with unilateral hip OA were randomized to three groups: low, medium or high force mobilization group. Participants received three treatment sessions of LADM. Pressure pain thresholds (PPT) at hip, knee and heel, physical function (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities physical function subscale, timed up and go and 40 m self-placed walk test) and pain after the physical function tests (visual analogic scale) were assessed before and after the intervention.

RESULTS

The three treatment groups showed significant improvements in pain and in physical function (p < 0.05). The low-force group showed the largest effects size for pain (d = 2.0) and the greatest mean percentage increase in PPTs (hip = 30.3%, knee = 34.6%, heel = 25.6%). The high-force group showed the largest effects size for physical function (d = 0.5-0.7).

CONCLUSION

A low-force LADM produced the largest reduction in pain and a high-force LADM the largest improvement in physical function in hip OA patients. The improvements in pain and physical function after LADM in hip OA patients appear to be modulated by the intensity of the mobilization force.

摘要

背景

长轴牵伸松动术(LADM)已被证明可减轻髋骨关节炎(OA)患者的疼痛并改善其身体功能。但减轻疼痛和改善身体功能所需的最佳松动力强度仍不清楚。

目的

比较三种不同强度的 LADM 松动力对髋 OA 患者疼痛和身体功能的影响。

设计

随机对照试验。

方法

60 例单侧髋 OA 患者随机分为三组:低、中、高强度松动组。参与者接受 3 次 LADM 治疗。治疗前后评估髋关节、膝关节和足跟处的压力疼痛阈值(PPT)、身体功能(西安大略和麦克马斯特大学身体功能量表、计时起立行走测试和 40m 自我放置行走测试)和身体功能测试后的疼痛(视觉模拟评分)。

结果

三组治疗组疼痛和身体功能均有显著改善(p<0.05)。低强度组疼痛的效应量最大(d=2.0),PPT 增加的平均百分比最大(髋关节=30.3%,膝关节=34.6%,足跟=25.6%)。高强度组身体功能的效应量最大(d=0.5-0.7)。

结论

低强度 LADM 可最大程度减轻疼痛,高强度 LADM 可最大程度改善髋 OA 患者的身体功能。髋 OA 患者接受 LADM 后疼痛和身体功能的改善似乎与松动力强度有关。

相似文献

1
Comparison of high, medium and low mobilization forces for reducing pain and improving physical function in patients with hip osteoarthritis: Secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial.高、中、低动员力减轻髋骨关节炎患者疼痛和改善身体功能的比较:一项随机对照试验的二次分析。
Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2019 Jun;41:43-48. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2019.03.007. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
2
Comparison of high, medium and low mobilization forces for increasing range of motion in patients with hip osteoarthritis: A randomized controlled trial.高、中、低活动力对髋骨关节炎患者增加活动范围的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2018 Aug;36:81-86. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2018.05.004. Epub 2018 May 29.
3
Effectiveness of Dry Needling Therapy on Pain, Hip Muscle Strength, and Physical Function in Patients With Hip Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Controlled Trial.干针疗法对髋关节炎患者疼痛、髋部肌肉力量和身体功能的疗效:一项随机对照试验。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2021 May;102(5):959-966. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2021.01.077. Epub 2021 Feb 7.
4
Effect of physical therapy on pain and function in patients with hip osteoarthritis: a randomized clinical trial.物理疗法对髋关节炎患者疼痛和功能的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2014 May 21;311(19):1987-97. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.4591.
5
Randomised controlled trial of the cost-effectiveness of water-based therapy for lower limb osteoarthritis.下肢骨关节炎水基疗法成本效益的随机对照试验
Health Technol Assess. 2005 Aug;9(31):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-114. doi: 10.3310/hta9310.
6
Effects of dry needling in HIP muscles in patients with HIP osteoarthritis: A randomized controlled trial.针刺髋关节周围肌肉治疗髋关节骨关节炎的疗效:一项随机对照试验。
Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2019 Oct;43:76-82. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2019.07.006. Epub 2019 Jul 24.
7
Effectiveness of a Blended Physical Therapist Intervention in People With Hip Osteoarthritis, Knee Osteoarthritis, or Both: A Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial.混合式物理治疗师干预对髋关节炎、膝关节炎或两者并存患者的疗效:一项聚类随机对照试验。
Phys Ther. 2018 Jul 1;98(7):560-570. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzy045.
8
A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial for Aerobic and Strengthening Exercises on Physical Function and Pain for Hip Osteoarthritis.有氧运动和强化锻炼对髋关节炎患者身体功能和疼痛的初步随机对照试验。
PM R. 2020 Mar;12(3):229-237. doi: 10.1002/pmrj.12262. Epub 2019 Dec 12.
9
Effects of non-pharmacological conservative treatment on pain, range of motion and physical function in patients with mild to moderate hip osteoarthritis. A systematic review.非药物保守治疗对轻中度髋骨关节炎患者疼痛、活动范围和身体功能的影响:系统评价。
Complement Ther Med. 2019 Feb;42:214-222. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2018.11.021. Epub 2018 Nov 27.
10
The effect of high, medium and low mobilization forces applied during a hip long-axis distraction mobilization on the strain on the inferior ilio-femoral ligament and psoas muscle: A cadaveric study.高、中、低动员力在髋关节长轴牵伸手法中应用对髂股下韧带和腰大肌张力的影响:尸体研究。
Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2020 Jun;47:102148. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2020.102148. Epub 2020 Mar 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Relevance of Tibial Fixation during Tibiotarsal Joint Traction: Descriptive Cross-Sectional Study.跗关节牵引时胫骨固定的相关性:描述性横断面研究
J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2024 Sep 15;9(3):163. doi: 10.3390/jfmk9030163.
2
Effect of single end-range and not end-range Maitland mobilization on pressure pain threshold and functional measures in knee osteoarthritis: randomised, controlled clinical trial.单末端范围和非末端范围麦特兰德松动术对膝骨关节炎压痛阈值和功能测量的影响:随机对照临床试验。
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2022 Oct;58(5):774-783. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.22.07506-2. Epub 2022 Sep 12.
3
The influence of manual therapy dosing on outcomes in patients with hip osteoarthritis: a systematic review.
手法治疗剂量对髋骨关节炎患者结局的影响:系统评价。
J Man Manip Ther. 2022 Dec;30(6):315-327. doi: 10.1080/10669817.2022.2037193. Epub 2022 Feb 22.
4
End-range Maitland mobilization decreasing pain sensitivity in knee osteoarthritis: randomized, controlled clinical trial.终末段梅特兰松动术降低膝骨关节炎疼痛敏感性:随机对照临床试验。
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2022 Jun;58(3):442-451. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.22.06680-1. Epub 2022 Jan 5.