Suppr超能文献

纸笔版与计算机版神经心理测验实现的比较:以连线测验为例。

Comparison between a Paper-Pencil Version and Computerized Version for the Realization of a Neuropsychological Test: The Example of the Trail Making Test.

机构信息

Université Côte d'Azur, CoBTeK lab IA, France.

Université Côte d'Azur, CHU Pôle Réhabilitation Autonomie Vieillissement, CMRR, France.

出版信息

J Alzheimers Dis. 2019;68(4):1657-1666. doi: 10.3233/JAD-180396.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Neuropsychological tests are particularly important for the clinical evaluation and Alzheimer's disease (AD) diagnosis. However, the tests currently employed for neuropsychological assessment have been developed several decades ago, and thus they do not fully exploit the potential provided by modern digital tools. One of the tests most commonly employed to assess attention and executive functions is the Trail Making Test (TMT).

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the TMT developed and used for the serious exergame X-Torp (TMTX-Torp) can be used to evaluate cognitive functions such as mental flexibility.

METHODS

Adjusted multivariate mixed model was used to compare performances in the TMTX-Torp to performances in the standard variant (TMTs) in three populations. 21 participants with AD (78.6y±8.5 y), 27 with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) (76.8y±8.5 y), and 27 healthy (HEC) (71.8y±7.4 y) were included.

RESULTS

A difference was observed for the TMT A between AD and HEC and for the TMT B between AD and MCI and between AD and HEC. Whatever the variant of the TMT, we found a positive linear correlation between the time to complete the TMTX-Torp and the TMTs for HEC (TMT A: r = 0.75, p < 0.001; TMT B: r = 0.52, p = 0.008) and MCI participants (TMT A: r = 0.53, p = 0.005; TMT B: r = 0.48, p = 0.025) but not for AD participants.

CONCLUSION

Although these versions of the TMT were not identical, the results showed that both versions were able to discriminate between HEC, MCI, and AD populations.

摘要

背景

神经心理学测试对于临床评估和阿尔茨海默病(AD)的诊断尤为重要。然而,目前用于神经心理学评估的测试是几十年前开发的,因此它们并没有充分利用现代数字工具提供的潜力。用于评估注意力和执行功能的最常用测试之一是连线测试(TMT)。

目的

本研究旨在评估为严肃型外骨骼游戏 X-Torp(TMTX-Torp)开发并使用的 TMT 是否可用于评估认知功能,如思维灵活性。

方法

采用调整后的多元混合模型,比较了三组人群在 TMTX-Torp 中的表现与标准变体(TMTs)中的表现。共纳入 21 例 AD(78.6 岁±8.5 岁)、27 例 MCI(76.8 岁±8.5 岁)和 27 例健康对照(HEC)(71.8 岁±7.4 岁)。

结果

AD 与 HEC 之间的 TMT A,AD 与 MCI 之间以及 AD 与 HEC 之间的 TMT B 存在差异。无论 TMT 的变体如何,我们都发现完成 TMTX-Torp 的时间与 HEC(TMT A:r=0.75,p<0.001;TMT B:r=0.52,p=0.008)和 MCI 参与者(TMT A:r=0.53,p=0.005;TMT B:r=0.48,p=0.025)的 TMTs 之间呈正线性相关,但 AD 参与者则无相关性。

结论

尽管这两种 TMT 版本不完全相同,但结果表明,这两种版本均能够区分 HEC、MCI 和 AD 人群。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验