4 The Maltings, Walmer, Kent, United Kingdom (D.A.S.); and Centre for Applied Pharmacokinetic Research, Manchester Pharmacy School, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom (M.R.)
4 The Maltings, Walmer, Kent, United Kingdom (D.A.S.); and Centre for Applied Pharmacokinetic Research, Manchester Pharmacy School, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom (M.R.).
Drug Metab Dispos. 2019 Jun;47(6):665-672. doi: 10.1124/dmd.118.085951. Epub 2019 Mar 25.
The distribution of a drug within the body should be considered as involving movement of unbound drug between the various aqueous spaces of the body. At true steady state, even for a compound of restricted lipoidal permeability, unbound concentrations in all aqueous compartments (blood, extracellular, and intracellular) are considered identical, unless a compartment has a clearance/transport process. In contrast, total drug concentrations may differ greatly, reflecting binding or partitioning into constituents of each compartment. For most highly lipid permeable drugs, this uniform unbound concentration is expected to apply. However, many compounds have restricted lipoidal permeability and are subjected to transport/clearance processes causing a gradient between intracellular and extracellular unbound concentrations even at steady state. Additional concerns arise where the drug target resides in a site of limited vascularity. Many misleading assumptions about drug concentrations and access to drug targets are based on total drug. Correction, if made, is usually by measuring tissue binding, but this is limited by the lack of homogenicity of the organ or compartment. Rather than looking for technology to measure the unbound concentration it may be better to focus on designing high lipoidal permeable molecules with a high chance of achieving a uniform unbound drug concentration. It is hoped this paper will stimulate greater understanding of the path from circulation to cell interior, and thereby in part avoid or minimize the need to provide the experimentally very determining, and sometimes still questionable, answer to this problem.
药物在体内的分布应被视为未结合药物在体内各水相之间的移动。在真正的稳态下,即使对于脂溶性有限的化合物,所有水相(血液、细胞外和细胞内)中的未结合浓度都被认为是相同的,除非一个隔室具有清除/转运过程。相比之下,总药物浓度可能有很大差异,这反映了结合或分配到每个隔室的组成部分。对于大多数高度脂溶性药物,预计会出现这种均匀的未结合浓度。然而,许多化合物的脂溶性有限,并且受到转运/清除过程的影响,即使在稳态下,细胞内和细胞外未结合浓度之间也会存在梯度。当药物靶标位于血管有限的部位时,会出现更多的问题。许多关于药物浓度和药物靶标可及性的误解假设都是基于总药物。如果要进行校正,通常是通过测量组织结合,但这受到器官或隔室不均一性的限制。与其寻找测量未结合浓度的技术,不如专注于设计具有高脂溶性和高实现均匀未结合药物浓度机会的分子。希望本文能激发人们对从循环到细胞内部的途径的更深入理解,从而在一定程度上避免或最小化提供对这一问题的实验性非常确定且有时仍有疑问的答案的需要。