Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Östra, Gothenburg, 416 85, Sweden.
Department of Gastroenterology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark.
Surg Endosc. 2020 Jan;34(1):69-76. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06732-y. Epub 2019 Mar 25.
Hospital costs associated with the treatment of rectal cancer are considerable and the formation of a temporary stoma accounts for additional costs. Results from the EASY trial showed that early closure of a temporary ileostomy was associated with significantly fewer postoperative complications but no difference in health-related quality of life up to 12 months after rectal resection. The aim of the present study was to perform a cost analysis within the framework of the EASY trial.
Early closure (8-13 days) of a temporary stoma was compared to late closure (> 12 weeks) in the randomized controlled trial EASY (NCT01287637). The study period and follow-up was 12 months after rectal resection. Inclusion of participants was made after index surgery. Exclusion criteria were diabetes mellitus, steroid treatment, signs of postoperative complications or anastomotic leakage. Clinical effectiveness and resource use were derived from the trial and unit costs from Swedish sources. Costs were calculated for the year 2016 and analysed from the perspective of the healthcare sector.
Fifty-five patients underwent early closure, and 57 late closure in eight Swedish and Danish hospitals between 2011 and 2014. The difference in mean cost per patient was 4060 US dollar (95% confidence interval 1121; 6999, p value < 0.01) in favour of early closure. A sensitivity analysis, taking protocol-driven examinations into account, resulted in an overall difference in mean cost per patient of $3608, in favour of early closure (95% confidence interval 668; 6549, p value 0.02). The predominant cost factors were reoperations, readmissions and endoscopic examinations.
The significant cost reduction in this study, together with results of safety and efficacy from the randomized controlled trial, supports the routine use of early closure of a temporary ileostomy after rectal resection for cancer in selected patients without signs of anastomotic leakage.
Registered at clinicaltrials.gov, clinical trials identifier NCT01287637.
直肠癌治疗相关的医院费用相当可观,而临时造口的形成会增加额外的费用。EASY 试验的结果表明,早期关闭临时肠造口与术后并发症显著减少相关,但在直肠切除后 12 个月内,与健康相关的生活质量没有差异。本研究旨在 EASY 试验框架内进行成本分析。
在随机对照试验 EASY(NCT01287637)中,比较了临时造口的早期关闭(8-13 天)与晚期关闭(>12 周)。研究期和随访期为直肠切除后 12 个月。参与者在指数手术后纳入。排除标准为糖尿病、类固醇治疗、术后并发症或吻合口漏的迹象。临床疗效和资源使用来自试验,单位成本来自瑞典来源。2016 年计算了成本,并从医疗保健部门的角度进行了分析。
2011 年至 2014 年间,在瑞典和丹麦的八家医院,55 例患者行早期关闭,57 例患者行晚期关闭。每例患者的平均费用差异为 4060 美元(95%置信区间 1121;6999,p 值<0.01),早期关闭有利。考虑到方案驱动的检查,敏感性分析导致每例患者的平均成本差异为 3608 美元,早期关闭有利(95%置信区间 668;6549,p 值 0.02)。主要成本因素是再次手术、再次入院和内镜检查。
本研究显著降低了成本,同时随机对照试验的安全性和疗效结果支持在没有吻合口漏迹象的选定患者中常规使用早期关闭临时肠造口术,用于直肠癌的治疗。
在 clinicaltrials.gov 注册,临床试验标识符 NCT01287637。