Soula Mariajesus, Shmalberg Justin W, Johnson Matthew D
Am J Vet Res. 2019 Apr;80(4):335-341. doi: 10.2460/ajvr.80.4.335.
To compare use of a 3-level self-locking suture (3LSLS) technique with use of a previously described modified 3-loop pulley (M3LP) technique to repair rupture of the proximal aspect of patellar tendons in limbs from canine cadavers.
Paired hind limbs of 6 adult mixed-breed dogs.
A limb from each pair was randomly assigned to be repaired by the 3LSLS technique or M3LP technique with size-2 ultrahigh-molecular-weight polyethylene and size-0 monofilament polypropylene suture, respectively. Limbs were prepared, and each patellar tendon was transected at a site chosen to simulate rupture at the proximal aspect. Tendons were repaired with the assigned techniques and mechanically tested with a biaxial servohydraulic test system; the clamp was distracted until the repair failed. Force at 1 -mm gap formation, 3-mm gap formation, and repair failure and gap size at failure were measured and compared between methods. Mode of failure was recorded.
There was no significant difference between methods for the force required to produce a 1 - or 3-mm gap in the repair. The 3LSLS technique required a significantly higher load for complete failure; gap formation immediately before failure was significantly greater for this method than for the M3LP technique. Four of 6 repairs with the M3LP technique and 0 of 6 repairs with the 3LSLS technique failed by suture breakage.
The 3LSLS technique with size-2 ultrahigh-molecular-weight polyethylene suture was as effective at resistance to 1 - and 3-mm gap formation as the M3LP with size-0 monofilament polypropylene suture.
比较使用三级自锁缝合(3LSLS)技术与先前描述的改良三环滑轮(M3LP)技术修复犬类尸体肢体髌腱近端断裂的效果。
6只成年杂种犬的成对后肢。
将每对中的一个肢体随机分配,分别用2号超高分子量聚乙烯和0号单丝聚丙烯缝线,采用3LSLS技术或M3LP技术进行修复。准备好肢体,在选定的部位横断每条髌腱,以模拟近端断裂。用指定的技术修复肌腱,并用双轴伺服液压测试系统进行力学测试;拉伸夹具直至修复失败。测量并比较两种方法在形成1毫米间隙、3毫米间隙时的力、修复失败时的力以及失败时的间隙大小。记录失败模式。
两种方法在修复中产生1毫米或3毫米间隙所需的力没有显著差异。3LSLS技术在完全失败时需要显著更高的负荷;该方法在失败前立即形成的间隙明显大于M3LP技术。M3LP技术的6次修复中有4次因缝线断裂失败,3LSLS技术的6次修复中有0次因缝线断裂失败。
使用2号超高分子量聚乙烯缝线的3LSLS技术在抵抗1毫米和3毫米间隙形成方面与使用0号单丝聚丙烯缝线的M3LP技术同样有效。