Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Karolinska University Hospital at Huddinge, K57, 141 86, Stockholm, Sweden.
Clintec, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Mar 29;19(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2257-z.
Clinical team training has been advocated as a means to improve delivery care, and failed extractions is a suggested variable for clinical audit in instrumental vaginal delivery. Other activities may also have intended or unintended effects on care processes or outcomes.
We retrospectively observed 1074 mid and low vacuum extraction deliveries during three time periods (prevalence periods): Baseline (period 0), implemented team training (period 1 and 2) and monitoring of traction force during vacuum extraction (period 2). Our primary outcome was failed extraction followed by emergency cesarean section or obstetric forceps delivery.
The prevalence proportion (relative risk) of failed extraction decreased significantly after implementation of team training, from 19% (period 0) to 8 % (period 1), corresponding to a relative risk of 0.48 [0.26-0.87]. The secondary procedural outcome complicated delivery (duration > 15 min or number of pulls > 6, or cup detachment > 1) was decreased in period 2 compared to period 1, RR 0.42 [0.23-0.76]. Secondary clinical (neonatal) outcome were not affected.
Clinically based educational efforts and increased monitoring improved procedural outcome without improving neonatal outcome. The study design has inherent limitations in making causal inference.
临床团队培训已被提倡作为改善分娩护理的一种手段,而器械性阴道分娩中的失败性产钳助产是临床审核的一个建议变量。其他活动也可能对护理过程或结果产生有意或无意的影响。
我们回顾性观察了三个时期(流行期)的 1074 例中低真空吸引分娩:基线期(时期 0)、实施团队培训期(时期 1 和 2)和真空吸引期间牵引力量监测期(时期 2)。我们的主要结局是失败性产钳助产后紧急剖宫产或产钳助产。
实施团队培训后,失败性产钳助产的流行比例(相对风险)显著下降,从 19%(时期 0)降至 8%(时期 1),相对风险为 0.48[0.26-0.87]。与时期 1 相比,时期 2 的次要手术结局复杂分娩(持续时间>15 分钟或牵拉次数>6 次,或杯脱落>1 次)减少,RR 0.42[0.23-0.76]。次要临床(新生儿)结局不受影响。
基于临床的教育努力和增加监测改善了手术结局,而没有改善新生儿结局。研究设计在进行因果推断方面存在固有局限性。