Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Michael E DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; Center of Excellence in Health Equity, Training and Research, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX.
Center of Excellence in Health Equity, Training and Research, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; Department of Family and Community Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX.
J Am Coll Surg. 2019 Jul;229(1):38-46.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2019.02.054. Epub 2019 Mar 26.
We compared the rates of stroke, death, and/or MI between men and women, stratified by symptomatic status and procedure type (carotid endarterectomy [CEA] or carotid artery stent [CAS]).
Using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, crude and propensity-matched rates of the composite end point of stroke/death/MI were estimated. Multivariable logistic regression was used to calculate the odds of stroke/death/MI associated with sex.
Between 2005 and 2015, there were 1,242,688 carotid interventions performed (1,083,912 CEA; 158,776 CAS; 515,789 [41.5%] were female patients). Symptomatic admissions comprised 11.3% of the cohort. In-hospital stroke/death/MI rates were more prevalent in men compared with women (4.2% vs 3.9%; p < 0.01). Subgroup analysis revealed symptomatic women vs men had higher rates of stroke after CEA (7.7% vs 6.2%; p < 0.01) and CAS (9.9% vs 7.6%; p < 0.01). Asymptomatic women experienced the same rates of stroke after either CEA (0.3% vs 0.3%; p = 0.051) or CAS (0.4% vs 0.5%; p = 0.09). Propensity-matched logistic regression revealed that symptomatic males vs females had lower odds of stroke after CEA (odds ratio [OR] 0.81; 95% CI 0.72 to 0.91) and CAS (OR 0.72; 95% CI 0.57 to 0.90). Asymptomatic men and women had similar odds of stroke after both CEA (OR 0.95; 95% CI 0.79 to 1.14) and CAS (OR 0.70; 95% CI 0.43 to 1.13).
This is the largest cohort study to date that demonstrates asymptomatic women undergoing CEA or CAS do not have a higher risk of perioperative stroke, death, or MI. Symptomatic men experience lower rates of stroke after CEA or CAS.
我们比较了症状和程序类型(颈动脉内膜切除术[CEA]或颈动脉支架[CAS])分层后男性和女性的中风、死亡和/或 MI 发生率。
使用全国住院患者样本,估计中风/死亡/MI 复合终点的粗率和倾向匹配率。多变量逻辑回归用于计算与性别相关的中风/死亡/MI 的可能性。
在 2005 年至 2015 年间,共进行了 1242688 例颈动脉介入治疗(1083912 例 CEA;158776 例 CAS;515789 例[41.5%]为女性患者)。住院患者中 11.3%为症状性入院。与女性相比,男性住院期间中风/死亡/MI 发生率更高(4.2% vs 3.9%;p < 0.01)。亚组分析显示,症状性女性与男性相比,CEA 后中风发生率更高(7.7% vs 6.2%;p < 0.01)和 CAS(9.9% vs 7.6%;p < 0.01)。无症状女性在 CEA(0.3% vs 0.3%;p=0.051)或 CAS(0.4% vs 0.5%;p=0.09)后发生中风的几率相同。倾向匹配的逻辑回归显示,症状性男性与女性相比,CEA 后中风的可能性较低(比值比[OR]0.81;95%置信区间[CI]0.72 至 0.91)和 CAS(OR 0.72;95% CI 0.57 至 0.90)。无症状男性和女性在 CEA(OR 0.95;95% CI 0.79 至 1.14)和 CAS(OR 0.70;95% CI 0.43 至 1.13)后中风的可能性相似。
这是迄今为止最大的队列研究,表明无症状女性接受 CEA 或 CAS 治疗不会增加围手术期中风、死亡或 MI 的风险。症状性男性在 CEA 或 CAS 后中风发生率较低。