Suppr超能文献

衡量不可衡量的?一种量化温带耕地农业系统中综合虫害管理实践采用情况的方法。

Measuring the unmeasurable? A method to quantify adoption of integrated pest management practices in temperate arable farming systems.

机构信息

Department of Agriculture, Horticulture and Engineering Sciences, Scotland's Rural College, Edinburgh, UK.

Crop Science Department, Teagasc Oak Park Crops Research Centre, Carlow, Ireland.

出版信息

Pest Manag Sci. 2019 Dec;75(12):3144-3152. doi: 10.1002/ps.5428. Epub 2019 May 21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The impetus to adopt integrated pest management (IPM) practices has re-emerged in the last decade, mainly as a result of legislative and environmental drivers. However, a significant deficit exists in the ability to practically monitor and measure IPM adoption across arable farms; therefore, the aim of the project reported here was to establish a universal metric for quantifying adoption of IPM in temperate arable farming. This was achieved by: (i) identifying a set of key activities that contribute to IPM; (ii) weighting these in terms of their importance to the achievement of IPM using panels of expert stakeholders to create the metric (scoring system from 0 to 100 indicating level of IPM practised); (iii) surveying arable farmers in the UK and Ireland about their pest management practices; and (iv) measuring level of farmer adoption of IPM using the new metric.

RESULTS

This new metric was found to be based on a consistent conception of IPM between countries and professional groups. The survey results showed that, although level of adoption of IPM practices varied over the sample, all farmers had adopted IPM to some extent (minimum 32.6 [corrected] points, mean score of 67.1), [corrected] but only 15 [corrected] of 225 farmers (5.8%) had adopted more than 67.1% [corrected] of what is theoretically possible, as measured by the new metric.

CONCLUSION

We believe that this new metric would be a viable and cost-effective system to facilitate the benchmarking and monitoring of national IPM programmes in temperate zone countries with large-scale arable farming systems. © 2019 Society of Chemical Industry.

摘要

背景

在过去十年中,由于立法和环境驱动因素,采用综合虫害管理(IPM)实践的动力再次出现。然而,在实际监测和衡量耕地农场中 IPM 的采用方面,仍然存在显著的不足;因此,本报告所述项目的目的是建立一种通用的度量标准,以量化温带耕地农业中 IPM 的采用。这是通过以下步骤实现的:(i)确定有助于 IPM 的一组关键活动;(ii)使用专家组对这些活动进行加权,以确定其对实现 IPM 的重要性,从而创建度量标准(评分系统从 0 到 100 表示实施 IPM 的水平);(iii)调查英国和爱尔兰的耕地农民的害虫管理做法;(iv)使用新的度量标准衡量农民采用 IPM 的程度。

结果

发现这个新的度量标准基于各国和专业团体之间对 IPM 的一致概念。调查结果表明,尽管采用 IPM 实践的程度在样本中有所不同,但所有农民都在一定程度上采用了 IPM(最低 32.6[更正]分,平均得分为 67.1),但只有 225 名农民中的 15 名(5.8%)采用了超过新度量标准理论上可能的 67.1%[更正]。

结论

我们相信,这种新的度量标准将是一种可行且具有成本效益的系统,可促进温带国家大规模耕地农业系统中 IPM 计划的基准测试和监测。 © 2019 化学工业协会。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验