Department of Geriatric Psychiatry, Institute of Mental Health, Singapore, Singapore.
Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Eur J Neurol. 2019 Sep;26(9):1153-1160. doi: 10.1111/ene.13958. Epub 2019 Apr 30.
Prior literature on subjective cognitive decline (SCD) has mostly focused on memory complaints. It is uncertain whether the other non-memory complaints are equally relevant and can be used, alongside memory complaints, to identify populations at high risk of cognitive impairment. How the memory and non-memory complaints of SCD cluster with each other amongst community-dwelling individuals was investigated, and the differential utility of the symptom clusters of SCD in predicting objective cognitive performance was evaluated.
This study included 736 participants who were ≥60 years and had normal cognition, using the baseline data of an ongoing cohort study. Participants completed baseline assessments which comprised an SCD scale, a global cognitive measure and neuropsychological tests. Symptom clusters of SCD - as identified from exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses - were included in structural equation models to predict baseline changes in neuropsychological tests.
The symptoms of SCD were split into two distinct factors, of which factor 1 was reported much more frequently than factor 2. Each standard deviation (SD) increment in factor 1 led to a 0.16-0.50 SD increase in global cognition, immediate memory, visuospatial abilities, language, attention and delayed memory (P < 0.05). In contrast, each SD increment in factor 2 worsened some of the cognitive domains by 0.18-0.37 SD.
The various complaints of SCD can have different implications amongst cognitively normal older persons and may possibly be classified into age-related symptoms and pathological symptoms. The findings highlight the need for caution when selecting SCD measures, and illustrate the potential utility of SCD subtypes to inform on the underlying neurobiology.
先前关于主观认知下降(SCD)的文献主要集中在记忆主诉上。目前尚不确定其他非记忆主诉是否同样相关,以及是否可以与记忆主诉一起用于识别认知障碍风险较高的人群。本研究旨在调查社区居住个体中 SCD 的记忆和非记忆主诉彼此之间的聚类方式,并评估 SCD 症状集群在预测客观认知表现方面的差异效用。
本研究纳入了 736 名≥60 岁且认知正常的参与者,使用正在进行的队列研究的基线数据。参与者完成了基线评估,包括 SCD 量表、总体认知测量和神经心理学测试。通过探索性和验证性因子分析确定 SCD 的症状集群,并将其纳入结构方程模型中,以预测神经心理学测试的基线变化。
SCD 的症状分为两个不同的因素,其中因素 1 比因素 2更为常见。因素 1 的每个标准差(SD)增加导致总体认知、即刻记忆、视空间能力、语言、注意力和延迟记忆的增加 0.16-0.50 SD(P<0.05)。相比之下,因素 2 的每个 SD 增加使一些认知域恶化 0.18-0.37 SD。
认知正常的老年人中 SCD 的各种主诉可能具有不同的含义,并且可能被分为与年龄相关的症状和病理症状。这些发现强调了在选择 SCD 测量指标时需要谨慎,并说明了 SCD 亚型的潜在效用,可以为潜在的神经生物学提供信息。