Reporting null results and advancing science.
作者信息
Petty Sandra J, Gross Robert A
机构信息
From the Center for Biomedical Research Transparency (S.P.), New York, NY; Department of Medical Education (S.P.), Melbourne Medical School, The University of Melbourne; St. Vincent's Hospital (S.P.); Department of Neuroscience (S.P.), CCS, Monash University; Department of Neurology (S.P.), Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia; and University of Rochester Medical Center (R.A.G.), NY.
出版信息
Neurology. 2019 Apr 30;92(18):827-828. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000007400. Epub 2019 Mar 29.
PMID:30926682
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Reporting null results and advancing science.报告无效结果与推动科学发展。
Neurology. 2019 Apr 30;92(18):827-828. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000007400. Epub 2019 Mar 29.
2
Inverse publication reporting bias favouring null, negative results.有利于零结果、阴性结果的反向发表报告偏倚。
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2024 Jan 19;29(1):6-9. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2023-112292.
3
Silence science: the problem of not reporting negative trials.沉默的科学：不报告阴性试验结果的问题。
Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2004 Oct-Dec;18(4):180-2.
4
Conservative Tests under Satisficing Models of Publication Bias.发表偏倚满意模型下的保守检验
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 22;11(2):e0149590. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149590. eCollection 2016.
5
Publication bias in psychological science: comment on Ferguson and Brannick (2012).心理学科学中的发表偏差：评 Ferguson 和 Brannick（2012）。
Psychol Methods. 2012 Mar;17(1):129-36. doi: 10.1037/a0027128.
6
Publication bias in psychological science: prevalence, methods for identifying and controlling, and implications for the use of meta-analyses.心理学科学中的发表偏倚：普遍性、识别和控制方法，以及对元分析使用的影响。
Psychol Methods. 2012 Mar;17(1):120-8. doi: 10.1037/a0024445. Epub 2011 Jul 25.
7
A Vast Graveyard of Undead Theories: Publication Bias and Psychological Science's Aversion to the Null.大量的“僵尸”理论：发表偏倚与心理学科学界对无效假设的回避。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2012 Nov;7(6):555-61. doi: 10.1177/1745691612459059.
8
The science reproducibility crisis and the necessity to publish negative results.科学可重复性危机与发表阴性结果的必要性。
Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol. 2017 Dec;92(12):e75-e77. doi: 10.1016/j.oftal.2017.07.009. Epub 2017 Sep 8.
9
Methodological and Reporting Errors in Meta-Analytic Reviews Make Other Meta-Analysts Angry: A Commentary on Ferguson (2015).方法学和报告错误使元分析评论者愤怒：对弗格森（2015）的评论
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2015 Sep;10(5):677-9. doi: 10.1177/1745691615592235.
10
Determinants of selective reporting: A taxonomy based on content analysis of a random selection of the literature.选择性报告的决定因素：基于对随机选取文献内容分析的分类法。
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 5;13(2):e0188247. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188247. eCollection 2018.
引用本文的文献
1
The why, what, and how of publishing a manuscript: A blend of art and science.发表稿件的原因、内容及方式：艺术与科学的融合。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2023 Aug;71(8):2930-2931. doi: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_1930_23.
Zotero 插件