Texas A&M International University
Ludwig Maximilian University Munich, Germany.
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2012 Nov;7(6):555-61. doi: 10.1177/1745691612459059.
Publication bias remains a controversial issue in psychological science. The tendency of psychological science to avoid publishing null results produces a situation that limits the replicability assumption of science, as replication cannot be meaningful without the potential acknowledgment of failed replications. We argue that the field often constructs arguments to block the publication and interpretation of null results and that null results may be further extinguished through questionable researcher practices. Given that science is dependent on the process of falsification, we argue that these problems reduce psychological science's capability to have a proper mechanism for theory falsification, thus resulting in the promulgation of numerous "undead" theories that are ideologically popular but have little basis in fact.
发表偏倚在心理科学中仍是一个有争议的问题。心理科学倾向于避免发表无效结果,这使得科学的可重复性假设受到限制,因为如果没有对失败重复的潜在承认,那么重复就没有意义。我们认为,该领域经常构建论点来阻止对无效结果的发表和解释,并且无效结果可能会通过可疑的研究人员做法进一步被消除。鉴于科学依赖于证伪的过程,我们认为这些问题降低了心理科学对理论证伪的适当机制的能力,从而导致了众多在意识形态上流行但实际上依据不足的“不死”理论的颁布。