University of Pittsburgh.
Arizona State University.
Child Dev. 2020 Mar;91(2):661-678. doi: 10.1111/cdev.13233. Epub 2019 Mar 30.
This daily diary study examined how adolescents' institutional and teacher-specific trust predicted classroom behavioral engagement the day after being disciplined by that teacher. Within mathematics classrooms, adolescents (N = 190; M = 14 years) reported institutional and teacher-specific trust and then completed a 15-day diary assessing teacher discipline and behavioral engagement. The results indicated that, among adolescents with low teacher trust, discipline was unrelated to next-day behavior. Contrastingly, adolescents with high teacher but low institutional trust became less engaged following discipline, whereas those with high teacher and institutional trust became more engaged. These findings suggest that adolescents interpret discipline within the social context of trust, and adolescents' trust in the institution and teacher are important for discipline to improve behavior.
本日记研究考察了青少年对机构和教师的信任如何预测他们在被该教师惩戒后的第二天在课堂上的行为投入。在数学课堂上,青少年(N=190;M=14 岁)报告了对机构和教师的信任,然后完成了为期 15 天的日记评估,记录了教师的纪律处分和行为投入情况。结果表明,在对教师信任程度较低的青少年中,纪律处分与第二天的行为无关。相比之下,对教师信任程度较高但对机构信任程度较低的青少年在受到纪律处分后参与度降低,而对教师和机构信任程度较高的青少年参与度则提高。这些发现表明,青少年在信任的社会背景下解读纪律处分,青少年对机构和教师的信任对于通过纪律处分改善行为是很重要的。