Suppr超能文献

患者和家属激活式病情升级系统评估:瑞安规则。

Evaluation of a patient and family activated escalation system: Ryan's Rule.

机构信息

School of Nursing Midwifery and Social Sciences, Building 18, Central Queensland University, Bruce Highway, Rockhampton, Q 4702, Australia.

Central Queensland Hospital and Health Service, Queensland Health, Canning Street, Rockhampton, Q 4700, Australia.

出版信息

Aust Crit Care. 2020 Jan;33(1):39-46. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2019.01.002. Epub 2019 Mar 28.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Patients experience physiological changes in the hours preceding adverse medical events, and patients or their family can be the first to identify ominous signs of clinical deterioration that have gone undetected by health professionals. Patient and family activated escalation systems provide consumers access to a referral system that can address their concerns. In Queensland, this escalation system is called Ryan's Rule and once activated, triggers an independent clinical review. This study aimed to access clinicians' and activators' experiences to develop an understanding of the incidence, contributing factors, and outcomes surrounding Ryan's Rule activations.

METHOD

The study involved a retrospective chart review of Ryan's Rule (n = 57) activations in a regional hospital, over a 24-month period.

RESULTS

On average, there were 2.4 activations a month. There are three major findings: first, communication issues were central to more than half the activations, 35% of cases required no clinical intervention, with communication alone sufficient to achieve resolution. Second, this initiative was valued with 65% of activators stating that they would be comfortable calling again and having access to the escalation process was reassuring and improved communication between clinicians and patients. While clinicians doubted the appropriateness of activators use of the escalation tool, 15% of patients were transferred to receive a higher level of care. Lastly, clinicians labelled activations as a 'complaints' as opposed to a 'concern' and reasoned that a 'complaint' did not justify a full review of the consumer's perspective for the activation.

CONCLUSION

Consumers who activated a Ryan's Rule were satisfied and valued the process. It provides a reassuring safety net, empowering them to speak up and initiate a clinical review. Clear communication among clinicians and between clinicians and consumers is essential. Clinicians are hesitant to fully embrace Ryan's Rule, and this discordance contributes to the failure to fully evaluate reasons for call activation.

摘要

简介

患者在发生不良医疗事件前数小时会经历生理变化,患者或其家属可能是最先发现临床恶化的不祥迹象的人,而这些迹象可能未被医护人员察觉。患者和家属激活的升级系统为消费者提供了获得转介系统的途径,该系统可以解决他们的问题。在昆士兰州,这个升级系统被称为瑞安规则,一旦被激活,就会触发独立的临床审查。本研究旨在了解临床医生和激活者的经验,以了解瑞安规则激活的发生率、促成因素和结果。

方法

本研究对一家地区医院在 24 个月期间的 57 次瑞安规则(Ryan's Rule)激活进行了回顾性图表审查。

结果

平均每月有 2.4 次激活。有三个主要发现:第一,沟通问题是导致半数以上激活的核心问题,35%的病例不需要临床干预,仅通过沟通即可解决问题。第二,该举措受到重视,65%的激活者表示他们会再次拨打该电话,并能获得升级流程的支持,这有助于增强医患之间的沟通。虽然临床医生对激活者使用升级工具的适当性表示怀疑,但仍有 15%的患者被转至接受更高水平的治疗。最后,临床医生将激活标记为“投诉”,而不是“关注”,并认为“投诉”不能证明对消费者的看法进行全面审查是合理的。

结论

激活瑞安规则的消费者感到满意并重视这一流程。它提供了一个令人安心的安全网,使他们能够发声并启动临床审查。临床医生之间以及临床医生与消费者之间的清晰沟通至关重要。临床医生对瑞安规则持犹豫不决的态度,这种不一致导致未能充分评估激活的原因。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验