• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

冷冻球囊肺静脉消融联合左心耳封堵术:长期随访分析。

Cryoballoon pulmonary vein ablation and left atrial appendage closure combined procedure: A long-term follow-up analysis.

机构信息

Heart Rhythm Center, Centro Cardiologico Monzino IRCCS, Milan, Italy.

Heart Rhythm Center, Centro Cardiologico Monzino IRCCS, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Heart Rhythm. 2019 Sep;16(9):1320-1326. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2019.03.022. Epub 2019 Mar 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.hrthm.2019.03.022
PMID:30928784
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The combined left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) and cryoenergy pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) procedure has been proven safe and effective in managing stroke in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF), although most data refer to procedures performed using radiofrequency as the main energy source.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate long-term follow-up of patients with AF undergoing concomitant LAAC and cryoenergy PVI.

METHODS

Patients undergoing LAAC and cryoballoon PVI at our institution were enrolled. At 3, 6, and 24 months from the index procedure, we determined the atrial arrhythmia recurrence rate, the extent of LAAC, and the rate of cerebrovascular/bleeding events.

RESULTS

Forty-nine patients (mean age 69 ± 8 years; 32/49 (67%) men; CHADS-VASc score 2.8 ± 1.2; HAS-BLED score 3 ± 1) with a guideline-recommended LAAC indication were included. Acute PVI and complete LAAC were achieved in 100% of patients. All patients completed at least 24 months of follow-up. At 8 weeks and 6 months, complete or satisfactory (<5 mm leak) LAAC rates were achieved in 40 (82%) and 9 (18%) and in 42 (86%) and 7 (14%) of patients, respectively. The overall freedom from atrial arrhythmia rate at 24 months was 29 (60%), and 45 (92%) of patients were off antithrombotic drugs. The observed annualized stroke and bleeding rates were 1% and 2%, respectively, a 71% and 60% risk reduction in comparison to event rates predicted from CHADS-VASc and HAS-BLED scores.

CONCLUSION

Concomitant cryoballoon ablation and LAAC procedures appear safe and effective at long-term follow-up, with high antithrombotic drug withdrawal rates at 24 months.

摘要

背景

联合左心耳封堵(LAAC)和冷冻能量肺静脉隔离(PVI)术已被证明在管理非瓣膜性心房颤动(AF)患者的中风方面是安全有效的,尽管大多数数据是指使用射频作为主要能量源进行的手术。

目的

本研究旨在评估同时进行 LAAC 和冷冻球囊 PVI 的 AF 患者的长期随访结果。

方法

我们招募了在我院行 LAAC 和冷冻球囊 PVI 的患者。在指数手术后 3、6 和 24 个月,我们确定了房性心律失常复发率、LAAC 的范围以及脑血管/出血事件的发生率。

结果

共纳入 49 例患者(平均年龄 69 ± 8 岁;32/49(67%)为男性;CHADS-VASc 评分 2.8 ± 1.2;HAS-BLED 评分 3 ± 1),均符合 LAAC 适应证指南。100%的患者实现了急性 PVI 和完全 LAAC。所有患者均完成了至少 24 个月的随访。在 8 周和 6 个月时,分别有 40(82%)和 9(18%)以及 42(86%)和 7(14%)的患者达到完全或满意(<5 毫米渗漏)的 LAAC 率。24 个月时的总体无房性心律失常率为 29(60%),45(92%)的患者停用抗血栓药物。观察到的年化卒中率和出血率分别为 1%和 2%,与 CHADS-VASc 和 HAS-BLED 评分预测的事件发生率相比,风险降低了 71%和 60%。

结论

在长期随访中,冷冻球囊消融联合 LAAC 手术似乎是安全有效的,在 24 个月时抗血栓药物停药率较高。

相似文献

1
Cryoballoon pulmonary vein ablation and left atrial appendage closure combined procedure: A long-term follow-up analysis.冷冻球囊肺静脉消融联合左心耳封堵术:长期随访分析。
Heart Rhythm. 2019 Sep;16(9):1320-1326. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2019.03.022. Epub 2019 Mar 27.
2
Left atrial appendage closure after cryoballoon ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation.左心耳封堵术后冷冻球囊消融治疗心房颤动。
Herz. 2021 Apr;46(Suppl 1):82-88. doi: 10.1007/s00059-019-04880-4. Epub 2020 Jan 30.
3
Left Atrial Appendage Closure Versus Direct Oral Anticoagulants in High-Risk Patients With Atrial Fibrillation.左心耳封堵术与直接口服抗凝剂在伴有心房颤动的高危患者中的比较。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Jun 30;75(25):3122-3135. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.04.067.
4
Combined atrial fibrillation ablation and left atrial appendage closure: long-term follow-up from a large multicentre registry.心房颤动消融联合左心耳封堵:来自大型多中心注册研究的长期随访。
Europace. 2018 Nov 1;20(11):1783-1789. doi: 10.1093/europace/euy025.
5
Long-term outcomes of left atrial appendage closure with or without concomitant pulmonary vein isolation:a propensity score matching analysis based on CLACBAC study.基于 CLACBAC 研究的倾向评分匹配分析:左心耳封堵术联合或不联合肺静脉隔离术的长期结局。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2024 Feb 3;24(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s12872-024-03725-1.
6
Long-Term Safety and Efficacy in Continued Access Left Atrial Appendage Closure Registries.延续性左心耳封堵器使用登记研究的长期安全性和有效性。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Dec 10;74(23):2878-2889. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.09.064.
7
Combined catheter ablation and left atrial appendage closure as a hybrid procedure for the treatment of atrial fibrillation.联合导管消融和左心耳封堵术作为一种杂交手术治疗心房颤动。
Europace. 2015 Oct;17(10):1533-40. doi: 10.1093/europace/euv070. Epub 2015 May 1.
8
Long-term Event Reduction After Left Atrial Appendage Closure. Results of the Iberian Registry II.左心耳封堵术后的长期事件减少。伊比利亚注册研究II的结果。
Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2019 Jun;72(6):449-455. doi: 10.1016/j.rec.2018.03.017. Epub 2018 May 10.
9
Combination of left atrial appendage closure and catheter ablation in a single procedure for patients with atrial fibrillation: Multicenter experience.左心耳封堵术联合导管消融术一站式治疗心房颤动:多中心经验。
J Formos Med Assoc. 2019 May;118(5):891-897. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2018.10.006. Epub 2018 Oct 25.
10
Efficacy and safety of left atrial appendage closure in non-valvular atrial fibrillation in patients over 75 years.75岁以上非瓣膜性心房颤动患者左心耳封堵术的疗效与安全性
Heart Vessels. 2019 Nov;34(11):1858-1865. doi: 10.1007/s00380-019-01428-8. Epub 2019 May 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Streamlined concomitant pulse field ablation-based pulmonary vein isolation and left atrial appendage occlusion via a single venous access approach: a case report.通过单一静脉入路实现简化的基于脉冲场消融的肺静脉隔离与左心耳封堵:一例报告
Eur Heart J Case Rep. 2025 Jul 26;9(8):ytaf350. doi: 10.1093/ehjcr/ytaf350. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Comparison of prognosis and analysis of related risk factors among three different left atrial appendage occlusion procedures in patients with atrial fibrillation.心房颤动患者三种不同左心耳封堵术的预后比较及相关危险因素分析
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025 Feb 17;12:1534899. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1534899. eCollection 2025.
3
Insufficient Ablation is Associated with Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence after Combining Ablation and Left Atrial Appendage Closure.
消融不充分与消融联合左心耳封堵术后房颤复发相关。
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Jan 9;25(1):10. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2501010. eCollection 2024 Jan.
4
Intracardiac Echocardiography: An Invaluable Tool in Electrophysiological Interventions for Atrial Fibrillation and Supraventricular Tachycardia.心腔内超声心动图:心房颤动和室上性心动过速电生理干预中一种极有价值的工具。
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024 May 27;25(6):191. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2506191. eCollection 2024 Jun.
5
Feasibility study on atrial fibrillation ablation with pulsed field ablation and concomitant occlusion of the left atrial appendage.脉冲场消融联合左心耳封堵治疗心房颤动的可行性研究。
Europace. 2024 Jul 2;26(7). doi: 10.1093/europace/euae176.
6
Successful Percutaneous Retrieval of an Embolized Left Atrial Appendage Occluder.成功经皮取出栓塞的左心耳封堵器。
JACC Case Rep. 2022 Nov 30;4(24):101689. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccas.2022.101689. eCollection 2022 Dec 21.
7
Concomitant transcatheter occlusion versus thoracoscopic surgical clipping for left atrial appendage in patients undergoing ablation for atrial fibrillation: A meta-analysis.房颤消融患者左心耳经导管封堵与胸腔镜手术夹闭的对比:一项荟萃分析
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Sep 6;9:970847. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.970847. eCollection 2022.
8
Impact of Left Atrial Appendage Closure Combined with Catheter Ablation on Endocrine and Mechanical Cardiac Function in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation.左心耳封堵联合导管消融对心房颤动患者内分泌及心脏机械功能的影响
J Interv Cardiol. 2022 Mar 19;2022:3932912. doi: 10.1155/2022/3932912. eCollection 2022.
9
Concomitant Atrial Fibrillation Ablation and Appendage Occlusion: Ready for Prime Time?同期心房颤动消融与心耳封堵:时机已成熟?
JACC Case Rep. 2021 Sep 15;3(12):1413-1414. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccas.2021.07.021.
10
Device-Related Thrombosis in Patients Receiving One-Stop Intervention for Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis.一站式干预非瓣膜性心房颤动患者的器械相关血栓形成:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2021 Jan-Dec;27:10760296211005033. doi: 10.1177/10760296211005033.