Department of Cardiology (M.A.H.v.L., D.J.v.d.H., M.R.H., M.J.M., F.K., N.v.R.), VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Department of Cardiology, Isala Heart Centre, Zwolle, the Netherlands (M.A.H.v.L.).
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Apr;12(4):e007641. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.007641.
Transradial intervention (TRI) may impair digital perfusion with hand dysfunction as a result. However, the effect of TRI on digital perfusion has never been investigated, including the influence of variations of the collateral arterial network and the effect on hand dysfunction.
We investigated the effect of TRI on digital perfusion by laser Doppler perfusion imaging. Laser Doppler perfusion imaging was performed at baseline, during radial access, TR band application, and at discharge. We compared tissue perfusion of the homolateral thumb (access site) with the contralateral thumb (comparator) during radial access as primary outcome. The hand circulation was assessed with angiography. Upper extremity function was evaluated with the validated QuickDASH questionnaire at baseline and follow-up. A significant reduction of tissue perfusion was observed during radial access and TR band application in the homolateral thumb (-32%, -32%, respectively) and contralateral thumb (-34%, -21%, respectively). We detected no perfusion difference between the homolateral and contralateral thumb during radial access (217; interquartile range, 112-364 versus 209; interquartile range, 99-369 arbitrary flux units; P=0.59). Reduced perfusion of the thumb during radial access was not associated with incompleteness of the superficial palmar arch ( P=0.13). Digital perfusion improved at discharge, though it remained below baseline levels (homolateral -11% and contralateral -14%). Hand dysfunction at 18 months was not associated with TRI-induced perfusion reduction ( P=0.54).
TRI is safe. Digital perfusion is reduced in both hands during radial access and TR band application but is not associated with future loss of hand function and variations of the arterial hand supply.
经桡动脉介入(TRI)可能会导致手部功能障碍,从而损害手指灌注。然而,TRI 对手指灌注的影响从未被研究过,包括侧支动脉网络的变化以及对手部功能障碍的影响。
我们通过激光多普勒灌注成像研究了 TRI 对手指灌注的影响。在基线、桡动脉入路、TR 带应用和出院时进行激光多普勒灌注成像。我们将桡动脉入路期间同侧拇指(介入部位)与对侧拇指(对照)的组织灌注作为主要结果进行比较。用血管造影评估手部循环。用经验证的 QuickDASH 问卷在基线和随访时评估上肢功能。在桡动脉入路和 TR 带应用期间,同侧拇指(-32%,-32%)和对侧拇指(-34%,-21%)的组织灌注均明显减少。我们在桡动脉入路期间未检测到同侧和对侧拇指的灌注差异(217;四分位距,112-364 与 209;四分位距,99-369 任意流量单位;P=0.59)。桡动脉入路期间拇指灌注减少与掌浅弓不完全无关(P=0.13)。尽管出院时手指灌注有所改善,但仍低于基线水平(同侧-11%,对侧-14%)。18 个月时的手部功能障碍与 TRI 引起的灌注减少无关(P=0.54)。
TRI 是安全的。在桡动脉入路和 TR 带应用期间,双手的手指灌注均减少,但与手部功能丧失和手部动脉供应的变化无关。