Scalise Renato Francesco Maria, Salito Armando Mariano, Polimeni Alberto, Garcia-Ruiz Victoria, Virga Vittorio, Frigione Pierpaolo, Andò Giuseppe, Tumscitz Carlo, Costa Francesco
Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Policlinic "G. Martino", University of Messina, 98100 Messina, Italy.
Division of Cardiology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Graecia University, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy.
J Clin Med. 2019 Oct 18;8(10):1727. doi: 10.3390/jcm8101727.
Since its introduction, the transradial access for percutaneous cardiovascular procedures has been associated with several advantages as compared to transfemoral approach, and has become the default for coronary angiography and intervention. In the last 30 years, a robust amount of evidence on the transradial approach has been mounted, promoting its diffusion worldwide. This article provides a comprehensive review of radial artery access for percutaneous cardiovascular interventions, including the evidence from clinical trials of transradial vs. transfemoral approach, technical considerations, access-site complications and limitations, alternative forearm accesses (e.g., ulnar and distal radial artery), and ultimately the use of the radial approach for structural interventions.
自引入以来,经桡动脉途径进行经皮心血管介入手术与经股动脉途径相比具有诸多优势,并已成为冠状动脉造影和介入治疗的首选方法。在过去30年中,积累了大量关于经桡动脉途径的证据,推动了其在全球的推广。本文对经皮心血管介入治疗的桡动脉入路进行了全面综述,包括经桡动脉与经股动脉途径的临床试验证据、技术考量、穿刺部位并发症及局限性、前臂替代入路(如尺动脉和桡动脉远端),以及桡动脉途径在结构性介入治疗中的应用。