Suppr超能文献

超声引导下竖脊肌平面阻滞与肌间沟阻滞用于胸腔镜手术后镇痛的前瞻性随机对照研究。

Ultrasound-Guided Serratus Plane Block Versus Erector Spinae Block for Postoperative Analgesia After Video-Assisted Thoracoscopy: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Menoufia University, Shibin el-kom, Menoufia, Egypt.

Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Menoufia University, Shibin el-kom, Menoufia, Egypt.

出版信息

J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2019 Jul;33(7):1946-1953. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2019.02.028. Epub 2019 Feb 21.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

There is no gold standard for the management of postoperative pain after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). Interfascial nerve blocks were proposed as simple and effective options.

DESIGN

The present pilot randomized trial aimed to compare the perioperative analgesic effect of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (ESB) with serratus plane block (SPB) in patients undergoing VATS.

SETTING

University hospitals.

PARTICIPANTS

Sixty adult patients scheduled to undergo VATS were enrolled in the study.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either single-shot ultrasound-guided ESB or SPB.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The primary outcomes were pain severity, time to first postoperative analgesia, and intraoperative and postoperative analgesic requirements. Data analysis was performed with MedCalc, Version 15.8 (MedCalc, Ostend, Belgium. The ESB group showed a significantly lower VAS score than the SPB group from the 4th hour (p = 0.04) to the 6th hour postoperatively (p = 0.002), and the VAS score was significantly lower in ESB group than the SPB group because the patients were alert (p < 0.001); this trend was consistent until the 20th hour postoperatively. Similarly, the time for first required analgesic was significantly longer in the ESB group (p < 0.001). The mean arterial pressure was significantly higher in the SPB group than in the ESB group 12 hours postoperatively (p < 0.001). No major side effects were observed in either of the study groups.

CONCLUSION

ESB provided superior analgesia and longer time to first required analgesic than did SPB.

摘要

目的

电视辅助胸腔镜手术后(VATS)的术后疼痛管理尚无金标准。筋膜间神经阻滞被认为是一种简单有效的选择。

设计

本先导随机试验旨在比较超声引导竖脊肌平面阻滞(ESB)与胸肋横突肌平面阻滞(SPB)在 VATS 患者中的围手术期镇痛效果。

地点

大学医院。

参与者

纳入本研究的 60 例拟行 VATS 的成年患者。

干预措施

患者被随机分配以 1:1 的比例接受单次超声引导 ESB 或 SPB。

测量和主要结果

主要结局为疼痛严重程度、首次术后镇痛时间以及术中术后镇痛需求。数据分析使用 MedCalc,版本 15.8(MedCalc,奥斯坦德,比利时)。从第 4 小时(p=0.04)到第 6 小时(p=0.002),ESB 组的 VAS 评分明显低于 SPB 组,并且由于患者保持清醒,ESB 组的 VAS 评分明显低于 SPB 组(p<0.001);这种趋势一直持续到术后 20 小时。同样,ESB 组首次需要镇痛的时间明显更长(p<0.001)。术后 12 小时,SPB 组的平均动脉压明显高于 ESB 组(p<0.001)。两组均未观察到主要不良反应。

结论

与 SPB 相比,ESB 提供了更好的镇痛效果和更长的首次需要镇痛时间。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验