Baghel Preeti, Walia Shefali, Noohu Majumi M
ISIC Institute of Rehabilitation Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Centre for Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Sciences, Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi, India.
Hong Kong Physiother J. 2018 Dec;38(2):115-123. doi: 10.1142/S1013702518500099. Epub 2018 Aug 14.
Transfers are very important in functional activities of subjects with spinal cord injury (SCI). The transfer assessment instrument (TAI) was the first tool to standardize the assessment of transfer technique.
The purpose of this study was to establish the reliability and validity of TAI 3.0 in people with SCI in early rehabilitation phase.
Thirty subjects with acute traumatic SCI were recruited from a tertiary care center for SCI management. Four raters assessed the quality of transfer using TAI 3.0 and a fifth rater used global assessment of transfer scale (VAS). TAI 3.0's intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for intrarater and interrater reliability, standard error of measurement (SEM), minimal detectable change (MDC), limits of agreement and concurrent validity was determined.
The intrarater ICC was 0.93 to 0.98 and interrater ICC was 0.99, indicating high levels of reliability. The SEMs among the raters for TAI 3.0 total was from 0.23 to 0.28. The MDC among the raters TAI 3.0 total was from 0.54 to 0.86. Correlation for different raters between the TAI 3.0 and VAS ranged between 0.88 and 0.90.
TAI 3.0 is a reliable and valid tool to assess the transfer skill in individuals with SCI in early rehabilitation phase.
转移在脊髓损伤(SCI)患者的功能活动中非常重要。转移评估工具(TAI)是首个规范转移技术评估的工具。
本研究旨在确定TAI 3.0在SCI患者早期康复阶段的信度和效度。
从一家三级护理中心招募30例急性创伤性SCI患者进行SCI管理。4名评估者使用TAI 3.0评估转移质量,第5名评估者使用转移视觉模拟量表(VAS)进行整体评估。确定TAI 3.0在评估者内和评估者间信度的组内相关系数(ICC)、测量标准误差(SEM)、最小可检测变化(MDC)、一致性界限和同时效度。
评估者内ICC为0.93至0.98,评估者间ICC为0.99,表明信度较高。评估者间TAI 3.0总分的SEM为0.23至0.28。评估者间TAI 3.0总分的MDC为0.54至0.86。不同评估者的TAI 3.0与VAS之间的相关性在0.88至0.90之间。
TAI 3.0是评估SCI患者早期康复阶段转移技能的可靠且有效的工具。