Al-Qurashi Majed, Al Sabaani Nasser, Al Malki Salem
Anterior Segment Division, King Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Department of Ophthalmology, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
Saudi J Ophthalmol. 2019 Jan-Mar;33(1):12-17. doi: 10.1016/j.sjopt.2018.11.001. Epub 2018 Nov 12.
To compare the effectiveness of femtosecond laser (FSL) assisted and manual arcuate keratotomy (AK) procedures for the correction of postkeratoplasty astigmatism.
Fifty-two eyes (52 patients) were treated with FSL assisted AK and 53 eyes (51 patients) with manual AK for post-keratoplasty astigmatism. The main outcome measures included preoperative and postoperative manifest refraction, uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity (UDVA, CDVA), corneal topography and complications.
In FSL group, UDVA changed significantly from 0.90 ± 0.43 preoperatively to 0.60 ± 0.39 at last follow-up (p = 0.001). In manual group, preop- (0.87 ± 0.35) and post-operative UDVA (0.93 ± 042) were comparable (p = 0.535). CDVA improved from 0.30 ± 0.18 preoperatively to 0.20 ± 0.14 at last follow-up visit in FSL group (0.014) and 0.28 ± 0.15 preoperative to 0.23 ± 0.19 at last postoperative visit (0.074) in manual group. Postoperative UDVA and CDVA were comparable between both the groups (p > 0.05). The mean preoperative refractive cylinder was 6.38 ± 3.73 and 7.15 ± 132, decreasing significantly to 5.06 ± 2.06 and 5.19 ± 2.25 after manual and FSL assisted AK procedures respectively. Mean change in the refractive cylinder was -1.10 ± 4.11 in manual AK group and -2.19 ± 2.35 in FSL group (p = 0.134). Perforation, overcorrection and regression occurred in respectively 3 eyes (5.8%), 12 eyes (23.07%) and 1 eye (1.92%) in FSL group and 1 eye (1.9%; macro-perforation), 7 eyes (13.21%) and 8 eyes (15.09%) in manual group. Additionally, in the manual group, severe ectasia occurred in 1 eye (1.9%).
FSL assisted AK procedure is comparable or to a certain extent better regarding safety and efficacy than manual AK procedure. Postoperatively, FSL resulted in better outcomes of UCVA, BCVA, refractive cylinder and keratometric astigmatism compared to the manual AK procedures; although, the difference between the groups was not statistically significant.
比较飞秒激光(FSL)辅助与手动弧形角膜切开术(AK)矫正角膜移植术后散光的效果。
52只眼(52例患者)接受FSL辅助AK治疗,53只眼(51例患者)接受手动AK治疗以矫正角膜移植术后散光。主要观察指标包括术前和术后的显验光、未矫正和矫正远视力(UDVA、CDVA)、角膜地形图及并发症。
FSL组中,UDVA术前为0.90±0.43,末次随访时显著变为0.60±0.39(p = 0.001)。手动组中,术前(0.87±0.35)和术后UDVA(0.93±0.42)具有可比性(p = 0.535)。FSL组CDVA术前为0.30±0.18,末次随访时变为0.20±0.14(p = 0.014);手动组术前为0.28±0.15,术后末次随访时变为0.23±0.19(p = 0.074)。两组术后UDVA和CDVA具有可比性(p>0.05)。术前平均屈光柱镜分别为6.38±3.73和7.15±1.32,手动和FSL辅助AK手术后分别显著降至5.06±2.06和5.19±2.25。手动AK组屈光柱镜平均变化为-1.10±4.11,FSL组为-2.19±2.35(p = 0.134)。FSL组分别有3只眼(5.8%)、12只眼(23.07%)和1只眼(1.92%)发生穿孔、过矫和回退;手动组分别有1只眼(1.9%;大穿孔)、7只眼(13.21%)和8只眼(15.09%)发生上述情况。此外,手动组有1只眼(1.9%)发生严重角膜扩张。
FSL辅助AK手术在安全性和有效性方面与手动AK手术相当,或在一定程度上更好。术后,与手动AK手术相比,FSL在UCVA、BCVA、屈光柱镜和角膜散光方面效果更好;尽管两组之间差异无统计学意义。