Suppr超能文献

大动脉硬化性卒中双联抗血小板治疗与单抗血小板治疗的比较。

Dual Versus Mono Antiplatelet Therapy in Large Atherosclerotic Stroke.

机构信息

From the Department of Neurology and Cerebrovascular Center, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea (D.K., M.-K.H., B.J.K., H.-J.B.).

Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, VA (D.K.).

出版信息

Stroke. 2019 May;50(5):1184-1192. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.024786.

Abstract

Background and Purpose- Two large-scale randomized controlled trials of recurrent stroke prevention suggest that dual antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel plus aspirin is beneficial for prevention of subsequent ischemic events. There is a paucity of data, however, on the efficacy or effectiveness of such an approach in the treatment of stroke patients with symptomatic large artery atherosclerotic occlusive disease. Methods- We used a multicenter stroke registry database (Clinical Research Collaboration for Stroke in Korea) to analyze acute ischemic stroke patients due to large artery atherosclerotic occlusive disease who were treated with aspirin alone or combination of clopidogrel and aspirin from May 2008 to May 2015. The results were analyzed by intention-to-treat, per-protocol, and as-treated methodologies. The primary end point was the 1-year composite outcome of stroke recurrence, myocardial infarction, and all-cause death. To balance the differences between groups, a frailty model using propensity scores and inverse probability of treatment weighting was used. Results- A total of 5934 patients with symptomatic large artery atherosclerotic occlusive disease were treated either with clopidogrel plus aspirin (n=2903, 49%) or aspirin (n=3031, 51%). The frequency of the primary outcome was 12% (n=353) in the clopidogrel-aspirin group and 14% (n=410) in the aspirin group. The hazards of the primary outcome with combination over aspirin only were significantly reduced in the per-protocol and as-treated analyses (hazard ratio, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.57-0.88; P=0.002 and hazard ratio, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.69-0.96; P=0.02, respectively), but there was borderline significance in the intention-to-treat analysis (hazard ratio, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.74-1.01; P=0.06). Combination therapy was beneficial for all-cause death in all analyses but did not reduce recurrent stroke. Conclusions- Compared with patients receiving aspirin monotherapy, the primary outcome seemed to occur less frequently in patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy, which is explained mainly by the decrease of all-cause death. Since this is a nonrandomized, retrospective, observational study, our study should be cautiously interpreted.

摘要

背景与目的-两项大型随机对照试验表明,氯吡格雷联合阿司匹林双联抗血小板治疗对预防复发性卒中有益。然而,对于有症状的大动脉粥样硬化性闭塞性疾病的卒中患者,这种治疗方法的疗效或有效性的数据很少。方法-我们使用多中心卒中登记数据库(韩国临床研究协作组)分析了 2008 年 5 月至 2015 年 5 月期间因大动脉粥样硬化性闭塞性疾病导致的急性缺血性卒中患者,这些患者单独接受阿司匹林治疗或接受氯吡格雷联合阿司匹林治疗。结果通过意向治疗、方案治疗和实际治疗方法进行分析。主要终点是卒中复发、心肌梗死和全因死亡的 1 年复合结局。为了平衡组间的差异,使用倾向评分和逆概率治疗加权的脆弱性模型。结果-共有 5934 例有症状的大动脉粥样硬化性闭塞性疾病患者接受了氯吡格雷联合阿司匹林治疗(n=2903,49%)或阿司匹林治疗(n=3031,51%)。氯吡格雷-阿司匹林组的主要结局发生率为 12%(n=353),阿司匹林组为 14%(n=410)。在方案治疗和实际治疗分析中,联合治疗相对于阿司匹林单药治疗的主要结局发生风险显著降低(风险比,0.71;95%置信区间,0.57-0.88;P=0.002 和风险比,0.81;95%置信区间,0.69-0.96;P=0.02),但意向治疗分析中存在边缘显著性(风险比,0.86;95%置信区间,0.74-1.01;P=0.06)。联合治疗对所有原因死亡均有益,但未降低卒中复发。结论-与接受阿司匹林单药治疗的患者相比,接受双联抗血小板治疗的患者主要结局似乎较少发生,这主要归因于全因死亡的减少。由于这是一项非随机、回顾性、观察性研究,我们的研究结果应谨慎解释。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验