Department of Neurology General Hospital of Northern Theater Command Shenyang China.
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Sep 17;13(18):e036318. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.036318. Epub 2024 Sep 9.
We conducted a post hoc analysis of the ATAMIS (Antiplatelet Therapy in Acute Mild to Moderate Ischemic Stroke) trial to investigate whether the priority of clopidogrel plus aspirin to aspirin alone was consistent between patients with and without stroke pathogenesis of large-artery atherosclerosis (LAA).
Patients with stroke classification randomized to a clopidogrel-plus-aspirin group and aspirin-alone group in a modified intention-to-treat analysis set of ATAMIS were classified into LAA and non-LAA subtypes. The primary outcome was early neurologic deterioration at 7 days, defined as a >2-point increase in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score compared with baseline, and safety outcomes were bleeding events and intracranial hemorrhage. We compared treatment effects in each stroke subtype and investigated the interaction. Among 2910 patients, 225 were assigned into the LAA subtype (119 in the clopidogrel-plus-aspirin group and 106 in the aspirin-alone group) and 2685 into the non-LAA subtype (1380 in the clopidogrel-plus-aspirin group and 1305 in the aspirin-alone group). Median age was 66 years, and 35% were women. A lower proportion of early neurologic deterioration was found to be associated with dual antiplatelet therapy in the LAA subtype (adjusted risk difference, -10.4% [95% CI, -16.2% to -4.7%]; =0.001) but not in the non-LAA subtype (adjusted risk difference, -1.4% [95% CI, -2.6% to 0.1%]; =0.06). No significant interaction was found (=0.11).
Compared with the non-LAA subtype, patients with stroke of the LAA subtype may get more benefit from dual antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel plus aspirin with respect to early neurologic deterioration at 7 days.
URL: clinicaltrials.gov; UnIque identifier: NCT02869009.
我们对 ATAMIS(急性轻度至中度缺血性卒中的抗血小板治疗)试验进行了事后分析,以调查氯吡格雷联合阿司匹林与单独使用阿司匹林在大动脉粥样硬化(LAA)发病机制的卒中患者之间,优先使用氯吡格雷联合阿司匹林是否一致。
在 ATAMIS 的改良意向治疗分析集的随机接受氯吡格雷联合阿司匹林组和单独使用阿司匹林组的卒中患者中,根据卒中分类分为 LAA 和非-LAA 亚型。主要结局是 7 天内的早期神经功能恶化,定义为与基线相比,国立卫生研究院卒中量表评分增加>2 分,安全性结局为出血事件和颅内出血。我们比较了每种卒中亚型的治疗效果,并研究了其相互作用。在 2910 例患者中,225 例被分配到 LAA 亚型(氯吡格雷联合阿司匹林组 119 例,单独使用阿司匹林组 106 例),2685 例被分配到非-LAA 亚型(氯吡格雷联合阿司匹林组 1380 例,单独使用阿司匹林组 1305 例)。中位年龄为 66 岁,35%为女性。在 LAA 亚型中,双重抗血小板治疗与较低的早期神经功能恶化发生率相关(调整风险差异,-10.4%[95%CI,-16.2%至-4.7%];=0.001),但在非-LAA 亚型中则无此相关性(调整风险差异,-1.4%[95%CI,-2.6%至 0.1%];=0.06)。未发现显著的相互作用(=0.11)。
与非-LAA 亚型相比,LAA 亚型卒中患者可能从氯吡格雷联合阿司匹林双重抗血小板治疗中获得更大的早期神经功能恶化获益。
网址:clinicaltrials.gov;独特标识符:NCT02869009。