Department of Surgical Sciences, C.I.R. Dental School, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2019 May;30(5):429-438. doi: 10.1111/clr.13428. Epub 2019 Apr 16.
Due to the inconclusive findings on the effect of laser therapy in the management of peri-implant diseases, the aim of this study was to analyze the adjunctive clinical efficacy of 980-nm diode laser (DL) irradiation in the treatment of peri-implant mucositis with mechanical debridement.
Two hundred and twenty patients with one implant diagnosed with peri-implant mucositis (probing depth [PD] ≥ 4 mm and bleeding on probing [BoP] [primary outcome]) were randomly allocated to test and control treatments. Patients in the control group (n = 110) received debridement using curettes and ultrasonic devices, while patients allocated in the test group (n = 110) received mechanical therapy in combination with DL irradiation (setting 980 nm, 2.5 W, 10 kHz, pw, 30 s). BoP, presence of plaque, and PD were recorded at baseline, 1 month, and 3 months after treatment.
Both therapeutic modalities yielded similar clinical improvements with comparable reductions in the number of BoP-positive sites, plaque scores, and PD values at 3 months (all p-values > 0.05). Complete disease resolution was obtained in 38/110 (34.5%) implants in the test group compared with 34/110 (30.9%) implants in the control group at the end of the observation period.
Based on these results, the adjunct use of DL did not yield any statistically significant clinical benefit as compared to nonsurgical mechanical treatment alone in controlling peri-implant inflammation at 3 months.
由于激光治疗在治疗种植体周围疾病方面的效果尚无定论,本研究旨在分析 980nm 半导体激光(DL)照射辅助机械清创治疗种植体周围黏膜炎的临床疗效。
将 220 名患有种植体周围黏膜炎(探诊深度 [PD]≥4mm 和探诊出血 [BoP] [主要结局])的患者随机分为试验组和对照组。对照组(n=110)采用龈下刮治和超声器械进行清创,试验组(n=110)则在机械治疗的基础上联合 DL 照射(980nm,2.5W,10kHz,pw,30s)。在基线、治疗后 1 个月和 3 个月时,记录 BoP、菌斑和 PD。
两种治疗方法均取得了相似的临床效果,3 个月时 BoP 阳性位点、菌斑评分和 PD 值均有可比的降低(均 p 值>0.05)。试验组 110 个种植体中有 38 个(34.5%)完全缓解,对照组有 34 个(30.9%),在观察期结束时。
基于这些结果,与单纯非手术机械治疗相比,DL 的辅助使用在 3 个月时对控制种植体周围炎症没有任何统计学上的显著临床益处。