Hurtado Silva Mariella, Berry Iain J, Strange Natalie, Djordjevic Steven P, Padula Matthew P
Proteomics Core Facility and School of Life Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Technology Sydney, Broadway NSW 2007, Australia.
The ithree Institute, Faculty of Science, University of Technology Sydney, Broadway NSW 2007, Australia.
Proteomes. 2019 Mar 29;7(2):11. doi: 10.3390/proteomes7020011.
Methods for analyzing the terminal sequences of proteins have been refined over the previous decade; however, few studies have evaluated the quality of the data that have been produced from those methodologies. While performing global N-terminal labelling on bacteria, we observed that the labelling was not complete and investigated whether this was a common occurrence. We assessed the completeness of labelling in a selection of existing, publicly available N-terminomics datasets and empirically determined that amine-based labelling chemistry does not achieve complete labelling and potentially has issues with labelling amine groups at sequence-specific residues. This finding led us to conduct a thorough review of the historical literature that showed that this is not an unexpected finding, with numerous publications reporting incomplete labelling. These findings have implications for the quantitation of N-terminal peptides and the biological interpretations of these data.
在过去十年中,蛋白质末端序列分析方法已得到完善;然而,很少有研究评估这些方法所产生数据的质量。在对细菌进行全局N端标记时,我们观察到标记并不完整,并研究了这种情况是否普遍存在。我们评估了一些现有的、公开可用的N端蛋白质组学数据集的标记完整性,并通过实验确定基于胺的标记化学方法无法实现完全标记,并且在序列特异性残基处标记胺基可能存在问题。这一发现促使我们对历史文献进行全面回顾,结果表明这并非意外发现,已有大量出版物报道了标记不完整的情况。这些发现对N端肽的定量以及这些数据的生物学解释具有重要意义。