• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

接受根治性同步放化疗的局部晚期颈段食管鳞状细胞癌患者的临床结局:一项基于人群的倾向评分匹配分析

The Clinical Outcomes of Locally Advanced Cervical Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients Receiving Curative Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy: A Population-Based Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

作者信息

Chen Yen-Hao, Lu Hung-I, Lo Chien-Ming, Wang Yu-Ming, Chou Shang-Yu, Hsiao Chang-Chun, Li Shau-Hsuan

机构信息

Department of Hematology-Oncology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung 833, Taiwan.

Graduate Institute of Clinical Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan.

出版信息

Cancers (Basel). 2019 Mar 30;11(4):451. doi: 10.3390/cancers11040451.

DOI:10.3390/cancers11040451
PMID:30934987
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6520767/
Abstract

This study investigated the clinical outcome of locally advanced cervical esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients who received curative concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) and their differences from thoracic ESCC patients. Among 411 enrolled ESCC patients, including 63 with cervical and 348 with thoracic ESCC, 63 thoracic patients were propensity score-matched to the 63 cervical patients. For cervical ESCC, T4b and high tumor grade were independent prognostic factors of a worse overall survival (OS) in univariate and multivariate analyses. The response rates to curative CCRT between cervical and the matched thoracic ESCC groups were similar but cervical ESCC had a better OS than that of the matched thoracic group (21.4 versus 10.1 months, = 0.012). Better OS was mentioned to be in the patients with complete response (CR), whether in the cervical or matched thoracic ESCC group. For patients without CR, patients who underwent esophagectomy had superior OS than those without operation in the matched thoracic ESCC group (11.6 versus 11.9 months, = 0.73). Only three patients received operation in the cervical ESCC group, thus the survival difference was not significant. Curative CCRT may be a reasonable treatment for cervical ESCC in clinical practice, and the role of surgery should be considered as salvage therapy if residual disease is evident.

摘要

本研究调查了接受根治性同步放化疗(CCRT)的局部晚期颈段食管鳞状细胞癌(ESCC)患者的临床结局及其与胸段ESCC患者的差异。在411例入组的ESCC患者中,包括63例颈段ESCC患者和348例胸段ESCC患者,对63例胸段患者与63例颈段患者进行倾向评分匹配。对于颈段ESCC,在单因素和多因素分析中,T4b和高肿瘤分级是总生存期(OS)较差的独立预后因素。颈段ESCC组与匹配的胸段ESCC组对根治性CCRT的缓解率相似,但颈段ESCC的OS优于匹配的胸段组(21.4个月对10.1个月,P = 0.012)。无论是颈段还是匹配的胸段ESCC组,完全缓解(CR)的患者OS较好。对于未达到CR的患者,在匹配的胸段ESCC组中,接受食管切除术的患者OS优于未手术的患者(11.6个月对11.9个月,P = 0.73)。颈段ESCC组只有3例患者接受了手术,因此生存差异不显著。在临床实践中,根治性CCRT可能是颈段ESCC的合理治疗方法,如果有明显的残留病灶,应考虑将手术作为挽救治疗手段。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/448e/6520767/3ef7e95445ae/cancers-11-00451-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/448e/6520767/1a2348e22741/cancers-11-00451-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/448e/6520767/5af93856795e/cancers-11-00451-g002a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/448e/6520767/5b6cd59b19ed/cancers-11-00451-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/448e/6520767/2e14813c139b/cancers-11-00451-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/448e/6520767/3ef7e95445ae/cancers-11-00451-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/448e/6520767/1a2348e22741/cancers-11-00451-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/448e/6520767/5af93856795e/cancers-11-00451-g002a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/448e/6520767/5b6cd59b19ed/cancers-11-00451-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/448e/6520767/2e14813c139b/cancers-11-00451-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/448e/6520767/3ef7e95445ae/cancers-11-00451-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
The Clinical Outcomes of Locally Advanced Cervical Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients Receiving Curative Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy: A Population-Based Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.接受根治性同步放化疗的局部晚期颈段食管鳞状细胞癌患者的临床结局:一项基于人群的倾向评分匹配分析
Cancers (Basel). 2019 Mar 30;11(4):451. doi: 10.3390/cancers11040451.
2
Inflammation-based prognostic scores predict the prognosis of locally advanced cervical esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients receiving curative concurrent chemoradiotherapy: a propensity score-matched analysis.基于炎症的预后评分可预测接受根治性同步放化疗的局部晚期颈段食管鳞状细胞癌患者的预后:一项倾向评分匹配分析。
PeerJ. 2018 Sep 19;6:e5655. doi: 10.7717/peerj.5655. eCollection 2018.
3
Treatment Outcomes of Patients with Locally Advanced Synchronous Esophageal and Head/Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Receiving Curative Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy.局部晚期同步食管和头/颈鳞状细胞癌患者接受根治性同期放化疗的治疗结果。
Sci Rep. 2017 Jan 30;7:41785. doi: 10.1038/srep41785.
4
Neck Lymph Node Metastasis as A Poor Prognostic Factor in Thoracic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients Receiving Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.颈淋巴结转移是接受同步放化疗的胸段食管鳞癌患者预后不良的因素:倾向评分匹配分析。
Sci Rep. 2018 Oct 10;8(1):15073. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-33400-3.
5
The prognostic significance of celiac lymph node metastasis in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma receiving curative concurrent chemoradiotherapy.接受根治性同步放化疗的局部晚期食管鳞状细胞癌患者腹腔淋巴结转移的预后意义。
Oncotarget. 2017 Oct 16;8(56):96190-96202. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.21878. eCollection 2017 Nov 10.
6
Concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone for patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in the era of intensity modulated radiotherapy: a propensity score-matched analysis.调强放疗时代局部晚期食管鳞癌同期放化疗与单纯放疗的比较:倾向评分匹配分析。
Thorac Cancer. 2021 Jun;12(12):1831-1840. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.13971. Epub 2021 May 5.
7
Efficacy of Different Chemotherapy Regimens in Patients with Locally Advanced Synchronous Esophageal and Head/Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Receiving Curative Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy.不同化疗方案对接受根治性同步放化疗的局部晚期同步性食管和头/颈部鳞状细胞癌患者的疗效
J Clin Med. 2020 Jan 10;9(1):197. doi: 10.3390/jcm9010197.
8
Age plays an important role in the decision of definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC): a propensity-score matched analysis of multicenter data (3JECROG R-02A).年龄在食管鳞状细胞癌(ESCC)确定性同步放化疗(CCRT)决策中起着重要作用:一项多中心数据的倾向评分匹配分析(3JECROG R-02A)
Transl Cancer Res. 2021 Jun;10(6):2932-2943. doi: 10.21037/tcr-21-505.
9
The crucial role of blood VEGF kinetics in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma receiving curative concurrent chemoradiotherapy.血 VEGF 动力学在接受根治性同步放化疗的局部晚期食管鳞癌患者中的关键作用。
BMC Cancer. 2018 Aug 20;18(1):837. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4731-9.
10
Concurrent chemoradiotherapy combined with enteral nutrition support: a radical treatment strategy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients with malignant fistulae.同步放化疗联合肠内营养支持:食管鳞状细胞癌合并恶性瘘患者的根治性治疗策略
Chin J Cancer. 2017 Jan 11;36(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s40880-016-0171-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Stratified treatment of localized cervical esophageal squamous cell carcinoma induced by neoadjuvant immunotherapy plus chemotherapy (SCENIC).新辅助免疫治疗联合化疗诱导的局限性颈段食管鳞状细胞癌的分层治疗(SCENIC)
J Thorac Dis. 2022 Sep;14(9):3277-3284. doi: 10.21037/jtd-22-402.
2
High expression of HNRNPR in ESCA combined with F-FDG PET/CT metabolic parameters are novel biomarkers for preoperative diagnosis of ESCA.HNRNPR 在 ESCA 中的高表达与 F-FDG PET/CT 代谢参数相结合,是 ESCA 术前诊断的新型生物标志物。
J Transl Med. 2022 Oct 4;20(1):450. doi: 10.1186/s12967-022-03665-4.
3
Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy-Driven Cell Plasticity by miR-200 Family Implicates the Therapeutic Response of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

本文引用的文献

1
Neck Lymph Node Metastasis as A Poor Prognostic Factor in Thoracic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients Receiving Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.颈淋巴结转移是接受同步放化疗的胸段食管鳞癌患者预后不良的因素:倾向评分匹配分析。
Sci Rep. 2018 Oct 10;8(1):15073. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-33400-3.
2
Inflammation-based prognostic scores predict the prognosis of locally advanced cervical esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients receiving curative concurrent chemoradiotherapy: a propensity score-matched analysis.基于炎症的预后评分可预测接受根治性同步放化疗的局部晚期颈段食管鳞状细胞癌患者的预后:一项倾向评分匹配分析。
PeerJ. 2018 Sep 19;6:e5655. doi: 10.7717/peerj.5655. eCollection 2018.
3
miR-200 家族通过协同放化疗驱动的细胞可塑性影响食管鳞癌的治疗反应。
Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Apr 14;23(8):4367. doi: 10.3390/ijms23084367.
4
Peripheral blood cell count ratios are predictive biomarkers of clinical response and prognosis for non-surgical esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients treated with radiotherapy.外周血细胞计数比值是预测非手术食管鳞状细胞癌患者接受放疗的临床反应和预后的生物标志物。
J Clin Lab Anal. 2020 Oct;34(10):e23468. doi: 10.1002/jcla.23468. Epub 2020 Jul 17.
5
Characterization of 500 Chinese patients with cervical esophageal cancer by clinicopathological and treatment outcomes.500例中国颈段食管癌患者的临床病理特征及治疗结果分析
Cancer Biol Med. 2020 Feb 15;17(1):219-226. doi: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2019.0268.
Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy with Docetaxel, Cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil Improves Survival of Patients with Advanced Esophageal Cancer Compared with Conventional Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy with Cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil.
与顺铂和 5-氟尿嘧啶的传统同步放化疗相比,多西他赛、顺铂和 5-氟尿嘧啶同步放化疗可提高晚期食管癌患者的生存率。
J Cancer. 2018 Jul 16;9(16):2765-2772. doi: 10.7150/jca.23456. eCollection 2018.
4
Cervical Esophageal Cancer Treatment Strategies: A Cohort Study Appraising the Debated Role of Surgery.颈段食管癌治疗策略:一项评估手术有争议作用的队列研究。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2018 Sep;25(9):2747-2755. doi: 10.1245/s10434-018-6648-6. Epub 2018 Jul 9.
5
Definitive chemoradiotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (DCF-R) for advanced cervical esophageal cancer.多西他赛、顺铂和5-氟尿嘧啶的确定性放化疗(DCF-R)用于晚期颈段食管癌
Esophagus. 2018 Oct;15(4):281-285. doi: 10.1007/s10388-018-0627-7. Epub 2018 Jun 15.
6
The clinical impact of supraclavicular lymph node metastasis in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma receiving curative concurrent chemoradiotherapy.根治性同步放化疗治疗局部晚期食管鳞癌患者锁骨上淋巴结转移的临床影响。
PLoS One. 2018 Jun 11;13(6):e0198800. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198800. eCollection 2018.
7
Comparison of Outcome of Esophagectomy Versus Nonsurgical Treatment for Resectable Esophageal Cancer with Clinical Complete Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy.新辅助治疗后临床完全缓解的可切除食管癌行手术与非手术治疗的结局比较。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2018 Aug;25(8):2428-2433. doi: 10.1245/s10434-018-6437-2. Epub 2018 Mar 21.
8
The prognostic significance of celiac lymph node metastasis in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma receiving curative concurrent chemoradiotherapy.接受根治性同步放化疗的局部晚期食管鳞状细胞癌患者腹腔淋巴结转移的预后意义。
Oncotarget. 2017 Oct 16;8(56):96190-96202. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.21878. eCollection 2017 Nov 10.
9
Neoadjuvant versus definitive chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced esophageal cancer : Outcomes and patterns of failure.新辅助放化疗与根治性放化疗治疗局部晚期食管癌:结局和失败模式。
Strahlenther Onkol. 2018 Feb;194(2):116-124. doi: 10.1007/s00066-017-1211-0. Epub 2017 Sep 15.
10
Chemoradiotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy plus surgery for esophageal cancer.食管癌的化疗放疗与化疗放疗联合手术治疗对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Aug 22;8(8):CD010511. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010511.pub2.