Institute for Global Innovation and Development, East China Normal University, 3663 North Zhongshan Rd., Shanghai 200062, China.
School of Urban and Regional Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Mar 31;16(7):1160. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16071160.
Environmental⁻economic efficiency assessment is an effective way to evaluate the degree of coordination between an economy and the environment. Previous studies on environmental⁻economic efficiency have primarily investigated the efficiency of economic production and have often overlooked the efficiency of pollution treatment in overall economic activities. We applied a network data envelopment analysis model to evaluate the environmental⁻economic efficiency of a multistage process with undesirable outputs in 30 Chinese provinces during 2001⁻2017. The multistage process consisted of two sequential stages: economic production and pollution treatment. The results show that the average environmental⁻economic efficiency across all provinces was generally low but demonstrated a gradual upward trend during the study period. The spatial pattern for the 30 provinces showed that provinces with medium or high environmental⁻economic efficiency are mainly located in the eastern regions in China. Finally, few provinces exhibited economic activities with high economic production and pollution treatment efficiency, with most provinces generally having low economic production and pollution treatment efficiency. Hence, provinces with different economic production and pollution treatment efficiency modes should implement targeted improvement strategies according to their characteristics.
环境-经济效率评估是评估经济与环境协调性的有效方法。以往关于环境-经济效率的研究主要考察了经济生产的效率,往往忽略了整体经济活动中污染治理的效率。我们应用网络数据包络分析模型,评估了 2001-2017 年间中国 30 个省份多阶段、具有非期望产出的环境-经济效率。该多阶段过程由经济生产和污染处理两个连续阶段组成。结果表明,所有省份的平均环境-经济效率普遍较低,但在研究期间呈逐渐上升趋势。30 个省份的空间格局表明,环境-经济效率处于中高水平的省份主要集中在中国东部地区。最后,很少有省份表现出经济生产和污染处理效率都高的经济活动,大多数省份的经济生产和污染处理效率普遍较低。因此,具有不同经济生产和污染处理效率模式的省份应根据自身特点实施有针对性的改进策略。