• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年人选择和控制方面的种族差异:来自康涅狄格州“金钱随人走”再平衡试点的结果。

Racial Differences in Choice and Control Among Older Adults: Results From Connecticut's Money Follows the Person Rebalancing Demonstration.

机构信息

Center for Gerontology and Healthcare Research, Brown University School of Public Health,Providence, Rhode Island, USA.

College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, Department of Human Development and Family Studies, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut, USA.

出版信息

J Aging Soc Policy. 2020 Mar-Apr;32(2):172-187. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2019.1589887. Epub 2019 Apr 1.

DOI:10.1080/08959420.2019.1589887
PMID:30935294
Abstract

We examined racial differences in determinants of choice and control in daily activities and service coordination for a sample of White and Black participants in the Connecticut Money Follows the Person (MFP) Rebalancing Demonstration. Within-group analyses were conducted to understand factors that contribute to choice and control among participants. While no disparities were found in the odds of reporting choice and control, our findings show that White participants with mental health challenges, who lived with family, and had more functional impairments and Black participants with engagement transition challenges were less likely to have choice and control over daily activities. Determinants varied by race for choice in service coordination. Findings indicate a need for initiatives to target different factors for White and Black MFP participants to optimize opportunities for choice and control after returning to community living.

摘要

我们考察了康涅狄格州“金钱随人走”(MFP)再平衡试点项目中白人和黑人参与者在日常生活活动选择和控制的决定因素方面的种族差异。我们进行了组内分析,以了解参与者选择和控制的贡献因素。虽然报告选择和控制的可能性没有差异,但我们的研究结果表明,有心理健康问题、与家人同住、功能障碍更多的白人参与者,以及有参与过渡挑战的黑人参与者,他们在日常生活活动中选择和控制的可能性较小。服务协调选择的决定因素因种族而异。研究结果表明,需要采取举措针对 MFP 的白人和黑人参与者的不同因素,以优化他们返回社区生活后的选择和控制机会。

相似文献

1
Racial Differences in Choice and Control Among Older Adults: Results From Connecticut's Money Follows the Person Rebalancing Demonstration.老年人选择和控制方面的种族差异:来自康涅狄格州“金钱随人走”再平衡试点的结果。
J Aging Soc Policy. 2020 Mar-Apr;32(2):172-187. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2019.1589887. Epub 2019 Apr 1.
2
Challenges to community transitions through Money Follows the Person.通过“人随钱走”实现社区过渡的挑战。
Health Serv Res. 2020 Jun;55(3):357-366. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13267. Epub 2020 Jan 27.
3
Connecticut's 'Money Follows The Person' Yields Positive Results For Transitioning People Out Of Institutions.康涅狄格州的“资金跟随个人”计划在帮助人们从机构环境过渡方面取得了积极成果。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2015 Oct;34(10):1628-36. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.0244.
4
Racial Differences in Treatment Decision-Making for Men with Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: a Population-Based Study.种族差异对临床局限性前列腺癌男性治疗决策的影响:一项基于人群的研究。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2016 Mar;3(1):35-45. doi: 10.1007/s40615-015-0109-8. Epub 2015 May 5.
5
Expanding the Andersen model: the role of psychosocial factors in long-term care use.扩展安德森模型:心理社会因素在长期护理使用中的作用。
Health Serv Res. 2002 Oct;37(5):1221-42. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.01053.
6
Trends in Relative Incidence and Prevalence of Dementia Across Non-Hispanic Black and White Individuals in the United States, 2000-2016.2000-2016 年美国非西班牙裔黑人和白人群体中痴呆症的相对发病率和流行率趋势。
JAMA Neurol. 2021 Mar 1;78(3):275-284. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.4471.
7
Differences in Living Arrangements Among Older Adults Transitioning Into the Community: Examining the Impact of Race and Choice.老年人在过渡到社区后的居住安排差异:考察种族和选择的影响。
J Appl Gerontol. 2019 Apr;38(4):454-478. doi: 10.1177/0733464816687496. Epub 2017 Jan 8.
8
Outcomes Associated with Home and Community-based Service Use Among Older Adults following a Nursing Home Transition.老年人从养老院出院后接受居家和社区护理服务的结果。
J Gerontol Soc Work. 2020 Nov-Dec;63(8):807-821. doi: 10.1080/01634372.2020.1830328. Epub 2020 Nov 11.
9
Black-White Disparities in Social and Behavioral Determinants of Health Index and Their Associations with Self-rated Health and Functional Limitations in Older Adults.黑-白人群在健康指标的社会和行为决定因素方面的差异及其与老年人自评健康和功能限制的关联。
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2021 Mar 31;76(4):735-740. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glaa264.
10
Reducing Disparities in the Quality of Palliative Care for Older African Americans through Improved Advance Care Planning: Study Design and Protocol.通过改进预先护理计划减少老年非裔美国人姑息治疗质量差距:研究设计和方案。
J Palliat Med. 2019 Sep;22(S1):90-100. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2019.0146.

引用本文的文献

1
Measuring Consumer-Reported Quality of Life Among Recipients of Publicly Funded Home- and Community-Based Services: Implications for Health Equity.衡量公共资助的居家和社区服务接受者的消费者报告生活质量:对健康公平的影响。
J Aging Health. 2024 Jul 24:8982643241267378. doi: 10.1177/08982643241267378.