• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

衡量公共资助的居家和社区服务接受者的消费者报告生活质量:对健康公平的影响。

Measuring Consumer-Reported Quality of Life Among Recipients of Publicly Funded Home- and Community-Based Services: Implications for Health Equity.

作者信息

Shippee Tetyana P, Duan Yinfei, Baker Zachary G, Parikh Romil, Bucy Taylor, Jutkowitz Eric

机构信息

Division of Health Policy and Management, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.

出版信息

J Aging Health. 2024 Jul 24:8982643241267378. doi: 10.1177/08982643241267378.

DOI:10.1177/08982643241267378
PMID:39046355
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11757797/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Despite an increased policy focused on home- and community-based services (HCBS), little is known about their quality of life (QoL)-a key measure of person-centered care. This paper addresses this gap by measuring consumers' self-reported QoL and identifying factors associated with disparities in QoL.

METHODS

We analyzed the 2015-2016 National Core Indicators-Aging and Disability survey for 3426 respondents in Minnesota, using factor analyses to identify latent QoL domains. Multivariable regression models identified predictors of QoL domains.

RESULTS

Factor analyses identified three valid and reliable latent QoL domains: security, self-determination, and care experiences. Younger consumers with disabilities (versus consumers ≥65 years of age), minoritized racial/ethnic groups, consumers with hearing loss, without a spouse/domestic partner, and not living in consumer's own/family home reported significantly lower QoL in various domains ( < .001).

DISCUSSION

Disparities in HCBS consumer-reported QoL exist, necessitating equitable reforms to improve HCBS quality for its increasingly diversified consumer base.

摘要

目标

尽管针对家庭和社区服务(HCBS)的政策关注度有所提高,但对于其生活质量(QoL)——以个人为中心的护理的一项关键衡量指标,我们却知之甚少。本文通过衡量消费者自我报告的生活质量并确定与生活质量差异相关的因素来填补这一空白。

方法

我们分析了明尼苏达州3426名受访者的2015 - 2016年国家核心指标——老龄化与残疾调查,使用因子分析来确定潜在的生活质量领域。多变量回归模型确定了生活质量领域的预测因素。

结果

因子分析确定了三个有效且可靠的潜在生活质量领域:安全感、自主决定权和护理体验。残疾的年轻消费者(与65岁及以上的消费者相比)、少数族裔群体、听力受损的消费者、没有配偶/同居伴侣以及不住在自己/家庭住所的消费者在各个领域的生活质量显著较低(<.001)。

讨论

家庭和社区服务消费者报告的生活质量存在差异,因此需要进行公平改革,以提高其日益多样化的消费者群体的家庭和社区服务质量。

相似文献

1
Measuring Consumer-Reported Quality of Life Among Recipients of Publicly Funded Home- and Community-Based Services: Implications for Health Equity.衡量公共资助的居家和社区服务接受者的消费者报告生活质量:对健康公平的影响。
J Aging Health. 2024 Jul 24:8982643241267378. doi: 10.1177/08982643241267378.
2
Racial and ethnic differences in unmet needs among older adults receiving publicly-funded home and community-based services.老年人接受公共资助的家庭和社区服务中未满足需求的种族和民族差异。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2024 Nov;72(11):3520-3529. doi: 10.1111/jgs.19153. Epub 2024 Aug 29.
3
Service Utilization and Consumer-Reported Unmet Needs in Medicaid Home- and Community-Based Services for Older Adults.老年人医疗补助居家和社区服务中的服务利用情况及消费者报告的未满足需求
J Aging Soc Policy. 2024 Dec 16:1-15. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2024.2422666.
4
Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Self-Rated Health and Sense of Control for Older Adults Receiving Publicly Funded Home- and Community-Based Services.接受公共资助的居家和社区服务的老年人自评健康和控制感的种族/民族差异。
J Aging Health. 2020 Dec;32(10):1376-1386. doi: 10.1177/0898264320929560. Epub 2020 Jun 14.
5
Evidence to Inform Policy and Practice: Mechanisms to Address Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Nursing Home Quality of Life.为政策与实践提供依据的证据:解决养老院生活质量方面种族/民族差异的机制
Innov Aging. 2022 May 23;6(4):igac037. doi: 10.1093/geroni/igac037. eCollection 2022.
6
Outcomes of Person-Centered Planning in Medicaid Home- and Community-Based Services.医疗补助居家和社区服务中的以人为本的规划的结果。
Gerontologist. 2024 Jun 1;64(6). doi: 10.1093/geront/gnae017.
7
Does Living in a Higher Proportion Minority Facility Improve Quality of Life for Racial/Ethnic Minority Residents in Nursing Homes?居住在少数族裔比例较高的养老院是否能提高养老院中少数族裔居民的生活质量?
Innov Aging. 2020 Jun 5;4(3):igaa014. doi: 10.1093/geroni/igaa014. eCollection 2020.
8
Consumers' and health providers' views and perceptions of partnering to improve health services design, delivery and evaluation: a co-produced qualitative evidence synthesis.消费者和卫生服务提供者对合作改善卫生服务设计、提供和评估的看法和认知:一项共同制定的定性证据综合研究。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 14;3(3):CD013274. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013274.pub2.
9
Home and Community-Based Services: A Systematic Review and Evidence Map.基于家庭和社区的服务:系统评价与证据图谱
J Gen Intern Med. 2024 Dec;39(16):3315-3321. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-08993-3. Epub 2024 Aug 13.
10
Examining Satisfaction and Quality in Home- and Community-Based Service Programs in the United States: A Scoping Review.考察美国居家和社区服务项目中的满意度和质量:范围综述。
Gerontologist. 2023 Oct 17;63(9):1437-1455. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnad003.

本文引用的文献

1
Examining Satisfaction and Quality in Home- and Community-Based Service Programs in the United States: A Scoping Review.考察美国居家和社区服务项目中的满意度和质量:范围综述。
Gerontologist. 2023 Oct 17;63(9):1437-1455. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnad003.
2
Evidence for Action: Addressing Systemic Racism Across Long-Term Services and Supports.行动证据:解决长期服务和支持中的系统性种族主义。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2022 Feb;23(2):214-219. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2021.12.018. Epub 2021 Dec 24.
3
The relationship between unmet need for home and community-based services and health and community living outcomes.家庭和社区服务未满足的需求与健康及社区生活结果之间的关系。
Disabil Health J. 2022 Apr;15(2):101222. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2021.101222. Epub 2021 Oct 9.
4
Age Differences in Determinants of Self-Rated Health among Recipients of Publicly Funded Home-and-Community-Based Services.公共资助的居家和社区服务接受者自评健康状况决定因素的年龄差异。
J Aging Soc Policy. 2023 May 4;35(3):374-392. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2021.1930815. Epub 2021 May 31.
5
Response shift in patient-reported outcomes: definition, theory, and a revised model.患者报告结局中的反应转移:定义、理论和修正模型。
Qual Life Res. 2021 Dec;30(12):3309-3322. doi: 10.1007/s11136-021-02846-w. Epub 2021 Apr 28.
6
Outcomes of Medicaid home- and community-based long-term services relative to nursing home care among dual eligibles.医疗保险居家和社区长期服务在双重资格人群中的护理院护理的结果。
Health Serv Res. 2020 Dec;55(6):973-982. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13573.
7
Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Self-Rated Health and Sense of Control for Older Adults Receiving Publicly Funded Home- and Community-Based Services.接受公共资助的居家和社区服务的老年人自评健康和控制感的种族/民族差异。
J Aging Health. 2020 Dec;32(10):1376-1386. doi: 10.1177/0898264320929560. Epub 2020 Jun 14.
8
Racial Differences in Choice and Control Among Older Adults: Results From Connecticut's Money Follows the Person Rebalancing Demonstration.老年人选择和控制方面的种族差异:来自康涅狄格州“金钱随人走”再平衡试点的结果。
J Aging Soc Policy. 2020 Mar-Apr;32(2):172-187. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2019.1589887. Epub 2019 Apr 1.
9
What Do We Rate When We Rate Our Health? Decomposing Age-related Contributions to Self-rated Health.当我们评价自己的健康时,我们评价的是什么?分解自评健康中与年龄相关的贡献。
J Health Soc Behav. 2018 Mar;59(1):74-93. doi: 10.1177/0022146517750137. Epub 2018 Jan 10.
10
Making sense of Cronbach's alpha.理解克朗巴哈系数。
Int J Med Educ. 2011 Jun 27;2:53-55. doi: 10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd.