• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非常年轻的男性 ≤ 45 岁行根治性前列腺切除术的肿瘤特征、肿瘤学和功能结局。

Tumor characteristics, oncological and functional outcomes after radical prostatectomy in very young men ≤ 45 years of age.

机构信息

Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.

Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

World J Urol. 2020 Jan;38(1):95-101. doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02740-8. Epub 2019 Apr 2.

DOI:10.1007/s00345-019-02740-8
PMID:30937571
Abstract

PURPOSE

Age is an important prognostic factor for functional and oncological outcomes after radical prostatectomy (RP). Considering the long life-expectancy of young patients (≤ 45 years), it remains important to examine their outcomes.

METHODS

Of 16.049 patients who underwent RP between 01/2006 and 12/2014 at the Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, 119 (0.7%) were ≤ 45. Known prognosticators were compared according to patient age at RP (categorical as ≤ 45, > 45 and ≤ 65, > 65 years). Kaplan-Meier plots and Cox-regressions analyzed oncological outcomes [biochemical recurrence (BCR)-free survival and metastasis-free survival (MFS)]. Logistic regressions were used for functional outcome. Urinary continence (UC) was defined as the use of 0 or 1 safety pad/day and potency as an IIEF-5 score of ≥ 18.

RESULTS

Compared to their older counterparts, patients ≤ 45 years had more favorable tumor characteristics. Of all patients aged ≤ 45 years, 89% underwent bilateral and 9.3% unilateral nerve-sparing procedure. Five year BCR-free survival and MFS were 80.2% and 98.7% for patients ≤ 45 years, 72.8% and 95.0% for patients > 45 and ≤ 65 years and 70.5% and 94.9% for patients > 65 years. For the same groups, 1-year UC-rates were 97.4%, 89.4%, and 84.7% while 1.3%, 8.2%, and 11.6% used 1-2 pads/24 h. At 1-year, 75.6%, 58.6%, and 45.3% of preoperatively potent patients who underwent bilateral nerve-sparing were considered potent. Younger age was an independent predictor of favorable functional outcome also in multivariable analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients aged ≤ 45 years had more favorable tumor characteristics and oncological outcomes. Moreover, younger patients should be counseled about the excellent postoperative continence and potency rates.

摘要

目的

年龄是根治性前列腺切除术(RP)后功能和肿瘤学结果的重要预后因素。考虑到年轻患者(≤45 岁)的预期寿命较长,检查他们的结果仍然很重要。

方法

在 2006 年 1 月至 2014 年 12 月期间,在 Martini-Klinik 前列腺癌中心接受 RP 的 16049 名患者中,有 119 名(0.7%)患者≤45 岁。根据 RP 时患者的年龄(分类为≤45、>45 和≤65、>65 岁)比较已知的预后因素。通过 Kaplan-Meier 图和 Cox 回归分析肿瘤学结果[生化无复发生存(BCR)和无转移生存(MFS)]。逻辑回归用于功能结果。尿控(UC)定义为每天使用 0 或 1 个安全垫,而勃起功能作为 IIEF-5 评分≥18。

结果

与年龄较大的患者相比,≤45 岁的患者具有更有利的肿瘤特征。所有≤45 岁的患者中,89%接受了双侧神经保留手术,9.3%接受了单侧神经保留手术。≤45 岁患者的 5 年 BCR 无复发生存率和 MFS 分别为 80.2%和 98.7%,>45 和≤65 岁患者为 72.8%和 95.0%,>65 岁患者为 70.5%和 94.9%。对于同一组患者,1 年 UC 率分别为 97.4%、89.4%和 84.7%,而 1.3%、8.2%和 11.6%使用 1-2 个/24 小时垫。在 1 年时,75.6%、58.6%和 45.3%接受双侧神经保留手术的术前勃起功能正常患者被认为具有勃起功能。在多变量分析中,年龄较轻也是功能结果良好的独立预测因素。

结论

≤45 岁的患者具有更有利的肿瘤特征和肿瘤学结果。此外,应告知年轻患者术后出色的控尿和勃起功能恢复率。

相似文献

1
Tumor characteristics, oncological and functional outcomes after radical prostatectomy in very young men ≤ 45 years of age.非常年轻的男性 ≤ 45 岁行根治性前列腺切除术的肿瘤特征、肿瘤学和功能结局。
World J Urol. 2020 Jan;38(1):95-101. doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02740-8. Epub 2019 Apr 2.
2
Long-term evaluation of survival, continence and potency (SCP) outcomes after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术(RARP)后生存、控尿和性功能(SCP)结局的长期评估。
BJU Int. 2013 Aug;112(3):338-45. doi: 10.1111/bju.12001. Epub 2013 Mar 7.
3
Functional and oncological outcomes of patients aged <50 years treated with radical prostatectomy for localised prostate cancer in a European population.在欧洲人群中,接受根治性前列腺切除术治疗局限性前列腺癌的<50 岁以下患者的功能和肿瘤学结局。
BJU Int. 2014 Jul;114(1):38-45. doi: 10.1111/bju.12407. Epub 2013 Dec 2.
4
Introducing a new, simple scoring system to evaluate oncological and functional outcome after radical prostatectomy.引入一种新的、简单的评分系统,以评估根治性前列腺切除术后的肿瘤学和功能结果。
Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2003;37(5):392-5. doi: 10.1080/00365590310006327.
5
Nerve-sparing approach during radical prostatectomy is strongly associated with the rate of postoperative urinary continence recovery.在根治性前列腺切除术中采用神经保留方法与术后尿控恢复率密切相关。
BJU Int. 2013 May;111(5):717-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11315.x. Epub 2012 Jun 21.
6
Changes in continence and erectile function between 2 and 4 years after radical prostatectomy.前列腺癌根治术后2至4年间尿失禁和勃起功能的变化。
J Urol. 2009 Feb;181(2):731-5. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.10.019. Epub 2008 Dec 16.
7
Short- and Long-term Functional Outcomes and Quality of Life after Radical Prostatectomy: Patient-reported Outcomes from a Tertiary High-volume Center.根治性前列腺切除术的短期和长期功能结局及生活质量:来自一家三级高容量中心的患者报告结果。
Eur Urol Focus. 2017 Dec;3(6):615-620. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2017.08.001. Epub 2017 Aug 30.
8
Oncological and functional results of antegrade radical retropubic prostatectomy for the treatment of clinically localised prostate cancer.顺行性耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术治疗临床局限性前列腺癌的肿瘤学和功能结果。
Eur Urol. 2008 Mar;53(3):554-61. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.07.004. Epub 2007 Jul 16.
9
How to optimize patient selection for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: functional outcome analyses from a tertiary referral center.如何优化机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的患者选择:来自三级转诊中心的功能预后分析。
J Endourol. 2014 Jul;28(7):792-800. doi: 10.1089/end.2014.0007. Epub 2014 Mar 24.
10
Long-term oncological and continence outcomes after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a single-centre experience.腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术的长期肿瘤学和控尿效果:单中心经验。
BJU Int. 2012 Dec;110(11 Pt C):E985-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11279.x. Epub 2012 Jun 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Adverse In-Hospital Outcomes Following Robot-Assisted vs. Open Radical Prostatectomy in Quadragenarians.四十多岁患者接受机器人辅助与开放性根治性前列腺切除术后的院内不良结局
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Mar 31;17(7):1193. doi: 10.3390/cancers17071193.
2
The Association between Patient Characteristics and Biochemical Recurrence after Radical Prostatectomy.根治性前列腺切除术后患者特征与生化复发的关系。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Jul 11;60(7):1119. doi: 10.3390/medicina60071119.
3
The Effect of Adverse Patient Characteristics on Perioperative Outcomes in Open and Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy.

本文引用的文献

1
Prostate cancer in 432 men aged <50 years in the prostate-specific antigen era: a new outlook.《PSA 时代 432 名 <50 岁男性前列腺癌:新视角》。
BJU Int. 2018 Nov;122 Suppl 5:35-41. doi: 10.1111/bju.14586. Epub 2018 Nov 8.
2
Survival outcomes of younger men (< 55 years) undergoing radical prostatectomy.接受根治性前列腺切除术的年轻男性(<55岁)的生存结果。
Prostate Int. 2018 Mar;6(1):31-35. doi: 10.1016/j.prnil.2017.07.002. Epub 2017 Aug 9.
3
Tumor characteristics, treatments, and oncological outcomes of prostate cancer in men aged ≤50 years: a population-based study.
不良患者特征对开放性和机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术围手术期结局的影响。
Front Surg. 2020 Nov 10;7:584897. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2020.584897. eCollection 2020.
4
Clinicopathological characteristics of localized prostate cancer in younger men aged ≤ 50 years treated with radical prostatectomy in the PSA era: A systematic review and meta-analysis.在 PSA 时代接受根治性前列腺切除术治疗的年轻男性(≤50 岁)局限性前列腺癌的临床病理特征:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Cancer Med. 2020 Sep;9(18):6473-6484. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3320. Epub 2020 Jul 22.
5
Very Early Continence After Radical Prostatectomy and Its Influencing Factors.前列腺癌根治术后的早期控尿及其影响因素
Front Surg. 2019 Oct 25;6:60. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2019.00060. eCollection 2019.
≤50 岁男性前列腺癌的肿瘤特征、治疗方法和肿瘤学结局:一项基于人群的研究。
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2018 Apr;21(1):71-77. doi: 10.1038/s41391-017-0006-9. Epub 2018 Jan 16.
4
Functional Outcomes and Quality of Life After Radical Prostatectomy Only Versus a Combination of Prostatectomy with Radiation and Hormonal Therapy.根治性前列腺切除术与前列腺切除术联合放射治疗和激素治疗的功能结果和生活质量比较。
Eur Urol. 2017 Mar;71(3):330-336. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.11.015. Epub 2016 Nov 22.
5
Clinicopathological, functional, and immediate oncologic outcome assessment in men aged≤50 years with prostate cancer after robotic prostatectomy.≤50岁前列腺癌男性机器人前列腺切除术后的临床病理、功能及近期肿瘤学结局评估
Urol Oncol. 2017 Jan;35(1):30.e17-30.e24. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2016.07.016. Epub 2016 Aug 24.
6
Tumor Characteristics and Oncologic Outcome after Radical Prostatectomy in Men 75 Years Old or Older.75 岁及以上男性行根治性前列腺切除术的肿瘤特征和肿瘤学结局。
J Urol. 2016 Jul;196(1):89-94. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.01.009. Epub 2016 Jan 18.
7
Recent decline in prostate cancer incidence in the United States, by age, stage, and Gleason score.美国前列腺癌发病率近期按年龄、分期和 Gleason 评分的下降情况。
Cancer Med. 2016 Jan;5(1):136-41. doi: 10.1002/cam4.549. Epub 2015 Dec 2.
8
The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: Definition of Grading Patterns and Proposal for a New Grading System.2014年国际泌尿病理学会(ISUP)前列腺癌Gleason分级共识会议:分级模式的定义及新分级系统的建议
Am J Surg Pathol. 2016 Feb;40(2):244-52. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000530.
9
Nerve-sparing Surgery Technique, Not the Preservation of the Neurovascular Bundles, Leads to Improved Long-term Continence Rates After Radical Prostatectomy.保留神经手术技术,而非保留神经血管束,可提高前列腺癌根治术后的长期控尿率。
Eur Urol. 2016 Apr;69(4):584-589. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.07.037. Epub 2015 Aug 12.
10
The effect of age on functional outcomes after radical prostatectomy.年龄对前列腺癌根治术后功能结局的影响。
Urol Oncol. 2015 May;33(5):203.e11-8. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2015.01.015. Epub 2015 Mar 24.