Suppr超能文献

1 型糖尿病青少年患者斋戒(封斋)的安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Safety of Ramadan fasting in young patients with type 1 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Malaysia Sarawak, Sarawak, Malaysia.

Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

出版信息

J Diabetes Investig. 2019 Nov;10(6):1490-1501. doi: 10.1111/jdi.13054. Epub 2019 Apr 26.

Abstract

AIMS/INTRODUCTION: Although patients with type 1 diabetes are medically exempt, many insist on fasting during Ramadan. Multiple daily insulin injections (MDI), premixed insulin and continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) are commonly used. To date, little is known about the safety of Ramadan fasting in these patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We pooled data from 17 observational studies involving 1,699 patients treated with either CSII or non-CSII (including premixed and MDI) regimen. The study outcomes were the frequencies of hypoglycemia, hyperglycemia and/or ketosis. Given the lack of patient-level data, separate analyses for premixed and MDI regimen were not carried out.

RESULTS

The CSII-treated group (n = 203) was older (22.9 ± 6.9 vs 17.8 ± 4.0 years), and had longer diabetes duration (116.7 ± 66.5 vs 74.8 ± 59.2 months) and lower glycated hemoglobin (7.8 ± 1.1% vs 9.1 ± 2.0%) at baseline than the non-CSII-treated group (n = 1,496). The non-CSII-treated group had less non-severe hypoglycemia than the CSII-treated group (22%, 95% CI 13-34 vs 35%, 95% CI 17-55). Of the non-CSII-treated group, 7.1% (95% CI 5.8-8.5) developed severe hypoglycemia, but none from the CSII-treated group did. The non-CSII-treated group was more likely to develop hyperglycemia (12%, 95% CI 3-25 vs 8.8%, 95% CI 0-31) and ketosis (2.5%, 95% CI 1.0-4.6 vs 1.6%, 95% CI 0.1-4.7), and discontinue fasting (55%, 95% CI 34-76 vs 31%, 95% CI 9-60) than the CSII-treated group.

CONCLUSIONS

The CSII regimen had lower rates of severe hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia/ketosis, but a higher rate of non-severe hyperglycemia than premixed/MDI regimens. These suggest that appropriate patient selection with regular, supervised fine-tuning of the basal insulin rate with intensive glucose monitoring might mitigate the residual hypoglycemia risk during Ramadan.

摘要

目的/引言:尽管 1 型糖尿病患者在医学上可以豁免,但许多人仍坚持在斋月期间禁食。目前,常用的方法是多次皮下胰岛素注射(MDI)、预混胰岛素和持续皮下胰岛素输注(CSII)。迄今为止,对于这些患者在斋月禁食期间的安全性知之甚少。

材料和方法

我们汇总了 17 项观察性研究的数据,这些研究共涉及 1699 名接受 CSII 或非 CSII(包括预混和 MDI)治疗的患者。研究结果是低血糖、高血糖和/或酮症的频率。由于缺乏患者水平的数据,因此未对预混和 MDI 方案进行单独分析。

结果

CSII 治疗组(n=203)年龄较大(22.9±6.9 岁比 17.8±4.0 岁),糖尿病病程较长(116.7±66.5 个月比 74.8±59.2 个月),糖化血红蛋白水平较低(7.8±1.1%比 9.1±2.0%)。与非 CSII 治疗组(n=1496)相比,CSII 治疗组非严重低血糖的发生率低于非 CSII 治疗组(22%,95%CI 13-34%比 35%,95%CI 17-55%)。非 CSII 治疗组中,7.1%(95%CI 5.8-8.5%)发生严重低血糖,但 CSII 治疗组中没有发生严重低血糖。非 CSII 治疗组更有可能发生高血糖(12%,95%CI 3-25%比 8.8%,95%CI 0-31%)和酮症(2.5%,95%CI 1.0-4.6%比 1.6%,95%CI 0.1-4.7%),并且比 CSII 治疗组更有可能停止禁食(55%,95%CI 34-76%比 31%,95%CI 9-60%)。

结论

CSII 方案低血糖发生率较低,高血糖/酮症发生率较高,但非严重高血糖发生率高于预混/MDI 方案。这些结果表明,在斋月期间,通过定期监测血糖并对基础胰岛素剂量进行精细调整,对患者进行适当选择,可能会降低低血糖残留风险。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/373f/6825934/c118d622d46c/JDI-10-1490-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验