Miguel Hernández University, Elche, Alicante, Spain.
University of Balearic Islands, Palma, Balearic Islands, Spain.
Assessment. 2020 Dec;27(8):1748-1757. doi: 10.1177/1073191119839140. Epub 2019 Apr 2.
Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) is often used to evaluate attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and oppositional defiant disorder (ODD) symptom ratings by parents and teachers. An ADHD-inattention (IN), ADHD-hyperactivity/impulsivity (HI), and ODD three-factor model is usually the best model. Acceptable CFA models, however, can hide symptoms with poor convergent and discriminant validity. To demonstrate this issue, CFA models (i.e., cross-loadings set to zero) along with exploratory CFA models (i.e., cross-loadings allowed) were applied to parent ( = 308) and teacher ( = 258) ratings of ADHD/ODD symptoms with Spanish preschool children ( = 4.78, = .84, 56% boys). While the three-factor CFA model provided an acceptable-fit with moderate to substantial symptom-factor loadings, the three-factor exploratory CFA model, however, found a large number of the symptoms to show convergent and discriminant validity. These outcomes argue for the use of exploratory CFA procedures in the initial evaluation of ADHD/ODD rating scales.
验证性因子分析(CFA)常用于评估父母和教师对注意力缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)和对立违抗性障碍(ODD)症状的评定。ADHD 的注意力不集中(IN)、多动/冲动(HI)和 ODD 三因子模型通常是最佳模型。然而,可接受的 CFA 模型可能会掩盖具有较差收敛和区分效度的症状。为了说明这个问题,我们应用 CFA 模型(即,交叉负荷设为零)和探索性 CFA 模型(即,允许交叉负荷)来评估西班牙学龄前儿童的父母(=308)和教师(=258)的 ADHD/ODD 症状评定(=4.78,=.84,56%男孩)。虽然三因子 CFA 模型提供了可接受的拟合度,并且症状因子负荷适中到较大,但三因子探索性 CFA 模型发现大量症状表现出较好的收敛和区分效度。这些结果表明,在 ADHD/ODD 评定量表的初步评估中应使用探索性 CFA 程序。