Chronobiology Laboratory, Evolutionary and Integrative Biology Unit, Jawaharlal Nehru Centre for Advanced Scientific Research, Bangalore, Karnataka India.
Behavioural Neurogenetics Laboratory, Neurosciences Unit, Jawaharlal Nehru Centre for Advanced Scientific Research, Bangalore, Karnataka India.
J Biol Rhythms. 2019 Jun;34(3):231-248. doi: 10.1177/0748730419837767. Epub 2019 Apr 2.
The stability of circadian clock mechanisms under cyclic environments contributes to increased Darwinian fitness by accurately timing daily behavior and physiology. Earlier studies on biological clocks speculated that the timing of behavior and its accuracy are determined by the intrinsic period (τ) of the circadian clock under constant conditions, its stability, the period of the external cycle (T), and resetting of the clock by environmental time cues. However, most of these previous studies suffered from certain limitations, the major ones being a narrow range of examined τ values and a non-uniformity in the genetic background across the individuals tested. We present data that rigorously test the following hypotheses by employing Drosophila melanogaster fruit flies with τ ranging from 17 to 30 h in a uniform genetic background. We tested whether 1) precision (day-to-day stability of τ) is greater for clocks with τ close to 24 h; 2) accuracy (i.e., day-to-day stability of the phase relationship (ψ), where ψ is the duration between a phase of the rhythm and a phase of the external cycle) is greater for clocks with τ close to 24 h; 3) Ψ is delayed with an increase in τ; and 4) Ψ becomes more advanced with an increase in length of zeitgeber cycle (T). We show that precision is not always maximum for ~24-h clocks, but that accuracy is greatest when τ approximates T. Further, flies exhibit a delayed phase relationship with increasing τ and an advanced phase relationship under long T-cycles as compared with shorter T-cycles. We also describe relationships between activity and rest durations and how our observations fit predictions from models of circadian entrainment. Overall, we confirm that accuracy and phase of entrained rhythm are governed by both intrinsic clock period and the length of the external cycle; however, we find that the relationship between intrinsic period and precision does not fit previous predictions.
生物钟机制在周期性环境下的稳定性通过准确计时日常行为和生理,有助于提高达尔文适应度。早期关于生物钟的研究推测,行为的定时及其准确性取决于在恒常条件下生物钟的固有周期(τ)、其稳定性、外部周期(T)的周期以及环境时间线索对时钟的重置。然而,这些早期的研究大多存在一定的局限性,主要有:所研究的 τ 值范围较窄,以及受试个体的遗传背景不一致。我们提供的数据通过采用遗传背景一致的、τ 值范围为 17 至 30 小时的黑腹果蝇,严格检验了以下假设。我们检验了以下假设:1)在接近 24 小时的 τ 值时,精度(τ 的每日稳定性)是否更高;2)在接近 24 小时的 τ 值时,准确性(即相位关系(ψ)的每日稳定性,其中 ψ 是节律的一个相位和外部周期的一个相位之间的持续时间)是否更高;3)随着 τ 的增加,ψ 延迟;4)随着 zeitgeber 周期(T)的延长,ψ 变得更加提前。我们表明,精度并不总是最接近 24 小时的时钟最高,但准确性在 τ 接近 T 时最大。此外,与较短的 T 周期相比,随着 τ 的增加,相位关系延迟,而在较长的 T 周期下,相位关系提前。我们还描述了活动和休息持续时间之间的关系,以及我们的观察结果如何符合生物钟驯化模型的预测。总的来说,我们证实了精确性和被驯化节律的相位由内在时钟周期和外部周期的长度共同决定;然而,我们发现内在周期与精度之间的关系不符合之前的预测。