Öztürk Recep, Arıkan Şefik Murat, Toğral Güray, Güngör Bedii Şafak
Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Ankara Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2019 May-Aug;27(2):2309499019838355. doi: 10.1177/2309499019838355.
Large resection and reconstruction of the malignant tumors of the shoulder girdle are used to provide maximum protection of the soft tissues with sufficient surgical margin. However, these have their own difficulties. The goals of this study were to review demographic data of 187 patients diagnosed with the malignant tumors located around shoulder between 2001 and 2016 in our clinic, to evaluate the functional outcomes and surgical outcomes, and to classify the resection methods according to new classification systems.
There were 187 patients (108 male and 79 female) and the mean age at surgery was 47.9 (range 2-87). Fifty-one of these patients underwent biopsy only: 8 partial/total claviculectomy, 10 partial/total scapulectomy, 80 proximal humeral resection, 5 total humeral resection, 6 shoulder girdle resection, and 13 amputations. Eighty-six had prosthetic implants, five had fibula transpositions, and one had a massive homologous bone graft. Seventy-one of the 136 patients were followed for an average of 40.3 months.
When the bone resections were evaluated, the best results were obtained while the rotator cuff function is preserved in glenoid preserving partial scapulectomy, partial/total claviculectomy, and proximal humerus intercalary resection. In total, scapulectomy and proximal/total humeral resection operations' results were moderate because of partial or total injury of the abductor mechanism.
As a result, malignant tumors of the shoulder girdle and soft tissue can be treated with limb-sparing surgery procedures. Reconstructive procedures and reconstructive methods such as prosthetic replacement, auto-allograft, and soft tissue reconstructions should be specified in each case. These resection and reconstruction methods are reliable and applicable procedures for local tumor control, pain control, and functional outcomes. More rarely, amputation/disarticulation can be performed.
对肩胛带恶性肿瘤进行大范围切除和重建,旨在在保证足够手术切缘的同时最大程度地保护软组织。然而,这些手术存在各自的困难。本研究的目的是回顾2001年至2016年间在我院确诊为肩胛周围恶性肿瘤的187例患者的人口统计学数据,评估功能结局和手术结局,并根据新的分类系统对切除方法进行分类。
本研究共纳入187例患者(男性108例,女性79例),手术时的平均年龄为47.9岁(范围2 - 87岁)。其中51例患者仅接受了活检:8例行部分/全锁骨切除术,10例行部分/全肩胛骨切除术,80例行肱骨近端切除术,5例行全肱骨切除术,6例行肩胛带切除术,13例行截肢术。86例患者进行了假体植入,5例患者进行了腓骨移位,1例患者进行了大块同种异体骨移植。136例患者中的71例平均随访了40.3个月。
在评估骨切除情况时,保留肩袖功能的保肩胛部分切除术、部分/全锁骨切除术以及肱骨近端间置切除术取得了最佳效果。总体而言,肩胛骨切除术以及肱骨近端/全肱骨切除术的效果中等,因为外展机制受到了部分或全部损伤。
因此,肩胛带和软组织的恶性肿瘤可以采用保肢手术进行治疗。每种情况都应明确重建手术和重建方法,如假体置换、自体 - 同种异体移植以及软组织重建。这些切除和重建方法对于局部肿瘤控制、疼痛控制和功能结局而言是可靠且适用的手术。更罕见的情况下,可以进行截肢/关节离断术。