Bianchi Bruno, Shalom Diego E, Kamienkowski Juan E
Laboratorio de Inteligencia Artificial Aplicada, Instituto de Ciencias de la Computación (ICC), CONICET-Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Departamento de Física, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2019 Mar 18;13:82. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00082. eCollection 2019.
Predictions of future events play an important role in daily activities, such as visual search, listening, or reading. They allow us to plan future actions and to anticipate their outcomes. Reading, a natural, commonly studied behavior, could shed light over the brain processes that underlie those prediction mechanisms. We hypothesized that different mechanisms must lead predictions along common sentences and proverbs. The former ones are more based on semantic and syntactic cues, and the last ones are almost purely based on long-term memory. Here we show that the modulation of the N400 by Cloze-Task Predictability is strongly present in common sentences, but not in proverbs. Moreover, we present a novel combination of linear mixed models to account for multiple variables, and a cluster-based permutation procedure to control for multiple comparisons. Our results suggest that different prediction mechanisms are present during reading.
对未来事件的预测在日常活动中起着重要作用,如视觉搜索、听力或阅读。它们使我们能够规划未来的行动并预测其结果。阅读是一种自然的、常被研究的行为,它可以揭示这些预测机制背后的大脑过程。我们假设不同的机制必定会引导对普通句子和谚语的预测。前者更多地基于语义和句法线索,而后者几乎完全基于长期记忆。在这里我们表明,由填空任务可预测性引起的N400调制在普通句子中强烈存在,但在谚语中则不然。此外,我们提出了一种用于解释多个变量的线性混合模型的新颖组合,以及一种用于控制多重比较的基于聚类的置换程序。我们的结果表明,阅读过程中存在不同的预测机制。