Department of Pathology & Immunology, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Department of Pathology & Immunology, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
J Clin Microbiol. 2019 May 24;57(6). doi: 10.1128/JCM.02077-18. Print 2019 Jun.
Diarrheal illness is a major cause of morbidity and mortality throughout the world, yet the etiologic agent of many cases of gastrointestinal illness remains unspecified, often due to the lack of convenient, timely, and sensitive diagnostic testing. Although bulk fecal specimens remain the recommended specimen type for enteric culture, rectal swabs may be an option preferred by clinicians and patients due to the convenience and timing of collection. However, the lack of data evaluating the sensitivity of rectal swabs compared to fecal specimens for detection of enteric pathogens precludes this specimen type from being recommended by national guidelines. In this study, we retrospectively reviewed 480 paired rectal swab and fecal specimens submitted for enteric culture to the Barnes-Jewish Hospital and St. Louis Children's Hospital microbiology laboratories in St. Louis, MO, from 2002 to 2017. We report 32% positivity of paired specimens with an overall agreement of 93% and Cohen's κ of 0.84 (95% confidence interval, 0.78 to 0.89). Additionally, we evaluated the time to result from the time of patient presentation to the health care setting and demonstrate that rectal swabs have a significantly shorter time to an actionable result than bulk fecal specimens (median, 67.4 h versus 78.4 h, respectively; < 0.001). These findings indicate that rectal swabs facilitate on-demand culture-based testing with a sensitivity comparable to that of fecal specimens and thus should be recommended for enteric bacterial culture when bulk fecal specimens are unavailable.
腹泻病是全世界发病率和死亡率的主要原因,但许多胃肠道疾病的病因仍不明确,这通常是由于缺乏方便、及时和敏感的诊断检测。尽管大量粪便标本仍然是肠道培养的推荐标本类型,但由于采集方便和时间合适,直肠拭子可能是临床医生和患者更喜欢的选择。然而,由于缺乏评估直肠拭子与粪便标本在检测肠道病原体方面的敏感性的数据,国家指南不推荐使用这种标本类型。在这项研究中,我们回顾性分析了 2002 年至 2017 年期间从密苏里州圣路易斯市的 Barnes-Jewish 医院和圣路易斯儿童医院微生物实验室提交的 480 对直肠拭子和粪便标本进行肠道培养的结果。我们报告了 32%的配对标本阳性,总体一致性为 93%,Cohen's κ 为 0.84(95%置信区间,0.78 至 0.89)。此外,我们评估了从患者就诊到获得医疗结果的时间,并表明直肠拭子的检测结果获得时间明显短于大量粪便标本(中位数分别为 67.4 小时和 78.4 小时;<0.001)。这些发现表明,直肠拭子可按需进行基于培养的检测,其敏感性与粪便标本相当,因此在无法获得大量粪便标本时,应推荐用于肠道细菌培养。