Suppr超能文献

在成年志愿者中比较直肠拭子与粪便培养用于检测鼠伤寒沙门氏菌的效果。

Comparison of rectal swabs with fecal cultures for detection of Salmonella typhimurium in adult volunteers.

作者信息

Kotton Camille N, Lankowski Alexander J, Hohmann Elizabeth L

机构信息

Infectious Disease Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA.

出版信息

Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2006 Oct;56(2):123-6. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2006.04.003. Epub 2006 May 24.

Abstract

Rectal swabs are generally considered less sensitive than fecal culture, but there are no data directly comparing human rectal swabs with fecal samples for detection of Salmonella. A phase I clinical study of a live oral attenuated Salmonella typhimurium vaccine strain in volunteers receiving a large known inoculum provided the opportunity to compare concurrent rectal swab and fecal cultures. Of 155 paired samples from 9 volunteers, 65 (42%) were culture positive: 35 (54%) by both methods, 20 (31%) by fecal culture only, and 10 (15%) by swab only. When compared with fecal culture, rectal swabs were 64% sensitive and 90% specific. Rectal swabs are of moderate diagnostic utility for detection of Salmonella and may be useful when collection of fecal samples is impractical.

摘要

直肠拭子通常被认为比粪便培养的敏感性低,但没有直接比较人类直肠拭子与粪便样本检测沙门氏菌的数据。一项针对接受大量已知接种量的志愿者的鼠伤寒沙门氏菌减毒活疫苗株的I期临床研究提供了比较同期直肠拭子和粪便培养的机会。在来自9名志愿者的155对样本中,65对(42%)培养呈阳性:两种方法均为阳性的有35对(54%),仅粪便培养呈阳性的有20对(31%),仅拭子呈阳性的有10对(15%)。与粪便培养相比,直肠拭子的敏感性为64%,特异性为9%。直肠拭子对沙门氏菌检测具有中等诊断效用,在无法采集粪便样本时可能有用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验