Kotton Camille N, Lankowski Alexander J, Hohmann Elizabeth L
Infectious Disease Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2006 Oct;56(2):123-6. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2006.04.003. Epub 2006 May 24.
Rectal swabs are generally considered less sensitive than fecal culture, but there are no data directly comparing human rectal swabs with fecal samples for detection of Salmonella. A phase I clinical study of a live oral attenuated Salmonella typhimurium vaccine strain in volunteers receiving a large known inoculum provided the opportunity to compare concurrent rectal swab and fecal cultures. Of 155 paired samples from 9 volunteers, 65 (42%) were culture positive: 35 (54%) by both methods, 20 (31%) by fecal culture only, and 10 (15%) by swab only. When compared with fecal culture, rectal swabs were 64% sensitive and 90% specific. Rectal swabs are of moderate diagnostic utility for detection of Salmonella and may be useful when collection of fecal samples is impractical.
直肠拭子通常被认为比粪便培养的敏感性低,但没有直接比较人类直肠拭子与粪便样本检测沙门氏菌的数据。一项针对接受大量已知接种量的志愿者的鼠伤寒沙门氏菌减毒活疫苗株的I期临床研究提供了比较同期直肠拭子和粪便培养的机会。在来自9名志愿者的155对样本中,65对(42%)培养呈阳性:两种方法均为阳性的有35对(54%),仅粪便培养呈阳性的有20对(31%),仅拭子呈阳性的有10对(15%)。与粪便培养相比,直肠拭子的敏感性为64%,特异性为9%。直肠拭子对沙门氏菌检测具有中等诊断效用,在无法采集粪便样本时可能有用。