• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) Index as an Alternative for Orthodontic Treatment Need Decision in Relation to Angle Classification.同伴评估评分(PAR)指数作为与安氏分类相关的正畸治疗需求决策的替代方法。
Turk J Orthod. 2019 Mar;32(1):1-5. doi: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2019.18048. Epub 2019 Mar 1.
2
Malocclusion severity in Asian men in relation to malocclusion type and orthodontic treatment need.亚洲男性错颌畸形严重程度与错颌畸形类型及正畸治疗需求的关系。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005 Nov;128(5):648-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.05.045.
3
A Comparison of Three Orthodontic Treatment Indices with Regard to Angle Classification.三种正畸治疗指数在安氏分类方面的比较。
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2016;40(2):169-74. doi: 10.17796/1053-4628-40.2.169.
4
Assessment of Severity of Malocclusion and Orthodontic Treatment Need Using the Dental Esthetic Index and Angle's Classification: A Retrospective Study.采用牙美学指数和安氏分类评估错颌畸形严重程度和正畸治疗需求:一项回顾性研究。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2021 Oct 1;22(10):1167-1170.
5
Comparison of early treatment outcomes rendered in three different types of malocclusions.三种不同类型错颌畸形的早期治疗效果比较。
Angle Orthod. 2018 May;88(3):253-258. doi: 10.2319/091417-618.1. Epub 2018 Mar 7.
6
Evaluation of the peer assessment rating (PAR) index as an index of orthodontic treatment need.评估同伴评估评级(PAR)指数作为正畸治疗需求的指标。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002 Nov;122(5):463-9. doi: 10.1067/mod.2002.128465.
7
Validity of the American Board of Orthodontics Discrepancy Index and the Peer Assessment Rating Index for comprehensive evaluation of malocclusion severity.美国正畸委员会差异指数和同行评估评级指数在错牙合畸形严重程度综合评估中的有效性。
Orthod Craniofac Res. 2017 Aug;20(3):140-145. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12195. Epub 2017 Jul 3.
8
Evaluation of treatment and post-treatment changes by the PAR Index.使用PAR指数评估治疗及治疗后的变化。
Eur J Orthod. 1997 Jun;19(3):279-88. doi: 10.1093/ejo/19.3.279.
9
Relationship between index of complexity, outcome and need, dental aesthetic index, peer assessment rating index, and American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system.复杂指数、治疗结果与需求、牙齿美学指数、同伴评价等级指数以及美国正畸医师委员会客观评分系统之间的关系。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 Feb;131(2):248-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.04.045.
10
Early treatment outcome assessed by the Peer Assessment Rating index.通过同伴评估评分指数评估的早期治疗结果。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999 May;115(5):544-50. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(99)70277-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Distalization with Clear Aligners: Accuracy, Impact of Mini-Screws, and Clinical Outcomes.使用透明矫治器进行远中移动:准确性、微螺钉的影响及临床结果。
Dent J (Basel). 2025 Jul 14;13(7):316. doi: 10.3390/dj13070316.

本文引用的文献

1
A Comparison of Three Orthodontic Treatment Indices with Regard to Angle Classification.三种正畸治疗指数在安氏分类方面的比较。
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2016;40(2):169-74. doi: 10.17796/1053-4628-40.2.169.
2
Who needs orthodontic treatment? Who gets it? And who wants it?谁需要正畸治疗?谁接受了正畸治疗?又是谁想要正畸治疗?
Br Dent J. 2015 Feb 16;218(3):99-103. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2015.51.
3
Normative and self-perceived orthodontic treatment need in Nigerian school children.尼日利亚学龄儿童的正畸治疗规范需求与自我认知需求
Acta Odontol Scand. 2015 Jul;73(5):364-7. doi: 10.3109/00016357.2014.967721. Epub 2014 Oct 14.
4
The relationship of orthodontic treatment need with periodontal status, dental caries, and sociodemographic factors.正畸治疗需求与牙周状况、龋齿及社会人口统计学因素之间的关系。
ScientificWorldJournal. 2012;2012:498012. doi: 10.1100/2012/498012. Epub 2012 Oct 23.
5
Agreement between the index of complexity, outcome, and need and the dental and aesthetic components of the index of orthodontic treatment need.复杂性、结果和需求指数与正畸治疗需求指数的牙齿和美学成分之间的一致性。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Aug;140(2):233-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.09.028.
6
Associations between orthodontic treatment need and oral health-related quality of life among young adults: does it depend on how you assess them?正畸治疗需求与年轻成年人口腔健康相关生活质量的关系:这取决于你如何评估它们吗?
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2011 Apr;39(2):137-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2010.00573.x. Epub 2011 Jan 7.
7
Diagnostic agreement in the assessment of orthodontic treatment need using the Dental Aesthetic Index and the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need.使用牙审美指数和正畸治疗需要指数评估正畸治疗需求的诊断一致性。
Eur J Orthod. 2010 Apr;32(2):193-8. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjp084. Epub 2009 Oct 8.
8
Prevalence of orthodontic treatment need in southern Italian schoolchildren.意大利南部学龄儿童正畸治疗需求的流行情况。
Eur J Orthod. 2010 Feb;32(1):49-53. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjp050. Epub 2009 Aug 25.
9
Dental Aesthetic Index scores and perception of personal dental appearance among Turkish university students.土耳其大学生的牙科美学指数得分及对个人牙齿外观的认知
Eur J Orthod. 2009 Apr;31(2):168-73. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjn083. Epub 2009 Jan 6.
10
Relationship between index of complexity, outcome and need, dental aesthetic index, peer assessment rating index, and American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system.复杂指数、治疗结果与需求、牙齿美学指数、同伴评价等级指数以及美国正畸医师委员会客观评分系统之间的关系。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 Feb;131(2):248-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.04.045.

同伴评估评分(PAR)指数作为与安氏分类相关的正畸治疗需求决策的替代方法。

Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) Index as an Alternative for Orthodontic Treatment Need Decision in Relation to Angle Classification.

作者信息

Taner Lale, Uzuner Fatma Deniz, Çaylak Yağmur, Gençtürk Zeynep, Kaygısız Emine

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, Gazi University School of Dentistry, Ankara, Turkey.

Department of Biostatistics, Gazi University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Turk J Orthod. 2019 Mar;32(1):1-5. doi: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2019.18048. Epub 2019 Mar 1.

DOI:10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2019.18048
PMID:30944892
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6436909/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine cut-off points for the Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) index in relation with Angle classification to use as an alternative index for the treatment need assessment.

METHODS

This study included 607 orthodontic patients aged between 9 and 18 years. Angle classification, PAR, and dental aesthetic index (DAI) scores were determined. The DAI was used as the gold standard to evaluate the subjects for treatment need. The receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis was used to evaluate the PAR index in relation to treatment need assessed by DAI.

RESULTS

The mean PAR scores for Class I, II, and III malocclusions and total sample were 17.54, 14.27, 18.7, and 20.04, respectively. The areas under the ROC of PAR scores in relation to the DAI assessment were found as 68.3% for the total sample, 66.6% Class I, 59.2% Class II, and 71.3% Class III malocclusions. For the total sample, the optimum cut-off PAR score was 14 in relation to DAI assessment. The cut-off scores for Class I, II, and III malocclusions were 13, 11, and 16, respectively, but considering psychosocial aspects, the recommended score is 14 for Class III.

CONCLUSION

The PAR index can be considered to have an acceptable level of validity for the assessment of orthodontic treatment need regarding Angle classification.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定与安氏分类相关的同伴评估评分(PAR)指数的切点,以用作治疗需求评估的替代指标。

方法

本研究纳入了607名年龄在9至18岁之间的正畸患者。确定了安氏分类、PAR和牙齿美学指数(DAI)评分。DAI被用作评估受试者治疗需求的金标准。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)分析来评估PAR指数与DAI评估的治疗需求之间的关系。

结果

安氏I类、II类和III类错牙合畸形以及总样本的PAR平均得分分别为17.54、14.27、18.7和20.04。PAR评分与DAI评估相关的ROC曲线下面积在总样本中为68.3%,I类为66.6%,II类为59.2%,III类错牙合畸形为71.3%。对于总样本,与DAI评估相关的最佳PAR切点评分为14。I类、II类和III类错牙合畸形的切点评分分别为13、11和16,但考虑到心理社会因素,III类的推荐评分为14。

结论

PAR指数在评估与安氏分类相关的正畸治疗需求方面可被认为具有可接受的效度水平。