• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用PAR指数评估治疗及治疗后的变化。

Evaluation of treatment and post-treatment changes by the PAR Index.

作者信息

Birkeland K, Furevik J, Bøe O E, Wisth P J

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics and Facial Orthopedics, University of Bergen, Norway.

出版信息

Eur J Orthod. 1997 Jun;19(3):279-88. doi: 10.1093/ejo/19.3.279.

DOI:10.1093/ejo/19.3.279
PMID:9239958
Abstract

To assess the outcome of orthodontic treatment, 224 cases treated in a postgraduate clinic were evaluated. Pre-treatment (T1), post-treatment (T2) and 5-year follow-up (T3) study casts were assessed by the Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) Index. The influence of various factors upon treatment and long-term outcome was analysed. According to the PAR Index, orthodontic treatment reduced the malocclusions on average by 76.7 per cent, and at follow-up the reduction was 63.8 per cent. Follow-up stability was good for 76.3 per cent of the cases. Some cases (4.0 per cent) even improved, while moderate to severe post-treatment relapse occurred in 19.7 per cent of the cases. Orthodontic treatment changed Angle Class I, II and III malocclusions to near ideal occlusion (PAR scores 4.4-6.8). No long-term interaction between the groups was discovered. Sex and extraction/non-extraction treatments did not significantly affect the results. The initial PAR score accounted for 77.8 per cent of the variation in treatment PAR score change (T1-T2), and for 61.8 per cent of the variation of long-term PAR score change (T1-T3). Age at treatment start accounted significantly for the variability of treatment changes (P < 0.001). The PAR score at the end of treatment had some explanatory importance (R2 = 0.099) for the long-term (T1-T3) result. However, PAR score changes in the follow-up period were difficult to predict.

摘要

为评估正畸治疗的效果,对在研究生诊所接受治疗的224例患者进行了评估。采用同伴评估等级(PAR)指数对治疗前(T1)、治疗后(T2)以及5年随访(T3)的研究模型进行评估。分析了各种因素对治疗及长期效果的影响。根据PAR指数,正畸治疗平均将错牙合畸形减少了76.7%,随访时减少了63.8%。76.3%的病例随访稳定性良好。部分病例(4.0%)甚至有所改善,而19.7%的病例出现了中度至重度的治疗后复发。正畸治疗将安氏I类、II类和III类错牙合畸形转变为接近理想的牙合关系(PAR评分4.4 - 6.8)。未发现组间的长期相互作用。性别以及拔牙/不拔牙治疗对结果无显著影响。初始PAR评分占治疗PAR评分变化(T1 - T2)变异的77.8%,占长期PAR评分变化(T1 - T3)变异的61.8%。开始治疗时的年龄对治疗变化的可变性有显著影响(P < 0.001)。治疗结束时的PAR评分对长期(T1 - T3)结果有一定的解释意义(R2 = 0.099)。然而,随访期的PAR评分变化难以预测。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of treatment and post-treatment changes by the PAR Index.使用PAR指数评估治疗及治疗后的变化。
Eur J Orthod. 1997 Jun;19(3):279-88. doi: 10.1093/ejo/19.3.279.
2
The long-term benefits of orthodontic treatment.正畸治疗的长期益处。
Br Dent J. 2002 May 25;192(10):583-7. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4801433.
3
Factors associated with long-term patient satisfaction.与长期患者满意度相关的因素。
Angle Orthod. 2010 Nov;80(6):1155-8. doi: 10.2319/120909-708.1.
4
Evaluation of treatment and posttreatment changes of protraction facemask treatment using the PAR index.使用PAR指数评估前牵引面罩治疗的治疗效果及治疗后变化。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000 Oct;118(4):414-20. doi: 10.1067/mod.2000.108253.
5
Long-term evaluation of treated class II division 1 malocclusions utilizing the PAR index.
Br J Orthod. 1995 May;22(2):171-8. doi: 10.1179/bjo.22.2.171.
6
Factors associated with orthodontic stability: a retrospective study of 209 patients.与正畸稳定性相关的因素:对209例患者的回顾性研究。
World J Orthod. 2010 Spring;11(1):61-6.
7
Relationship between occlusion and satisfaction with dental appearance in orthodontically treated and untreated groups. A longitudinal study.正畸治疗组与未治疗组的咬合与牙齿外观满意度之间的关系:一项纵向研究。
Eur J Orthod. 2000 Oct;22(5):509-18. doi: 10.1093/ejo/22.5.509.
8
Finishing occlusion, degree of stability and the PAR index.完成咬合、稳定程度及PAR指数。
Aust Orthod J. 2000 Mar;16(1):9-15.
9
An appraisal of the Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) Index and a suggested new weighting system.同行评估评级(PAR)指数评估及新权重系统建议
Eur J Orthod. 1999 Apr;21(2):181-92. doi: 10.1093/ejo/21.2.181.
10
Personal audit in orthodontics.正畸学中的个人审核
Br J Orthod. 1993 May;20(2):135-44. doi: 10.1179/bjo.20.2.135.

引用本文的文献

1
Quality of orthodontic care in an academic setting in the Middle East.中东地区学术环境下的正畸治疗质量。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 27;15(1):3426. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-87927-3.
2
Striving for Perfection: How Stable Is Orthodontic Treatment When Excellent Outcomes Are Achieved? A 9-Year Post-Treatment Retrospective Study.追求完美:正畸治疗达到卓越效果后有多稳定?一项9年的治疗后回顾性研究。
J Clin Med. 2023 Dec 14;12(24):7692. doi: 10.3390/jcm12247692.
3
Factors influencing treatment outcomes assessed by the American Board of Orthodontics Objective Grading System (ABO-OGS).
影响美国正畸医师协会客观分级系统(ABO-OGS)评估的治疗效果的因素。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Dec 14;23(1):1000. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03735-z.
4
Assessment of the outcomes and stability after mandibular incisor extraction in orthodontic patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.正畸患者下颌切牙拔除后的疗效及稳定性评估:一项系统评价与Meta分析
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2023 Spring;17(2):71-80. doi: 10.34172/joddd.2023.36989. Epub 2023 Jul 17.
5
[Health relevance of malocclusions and their treatment].[错颌畸形及其治疗与健康的相关性]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2021 Aug;64(8):918-923. doi: 10.1007/s00103-021-03372-3. Epub 2021 Jul 8.
6
Quality of orthodontic care-A multicenter cohort study in Germany : Part 1: Evaluation of effectiveness of orthodontic treatments and predictive factors.正畸治疗质量:德国多中心队列研究 第 1 部分:正畸治疗效果评估及预测因素。
J Orofac Orthop. 2022 Sep;83(5):291-306. doi: 10.1007/s00056-021-00304-3. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
7
Assessment of orthodontic treatment outcome using Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) index among patients with non-syndromic unilateral cleft lip and palate.使用同伴评估评分(PAR)指数评估非综合征性单侧唇腭裂患者的正畸治疗效果。
J Orthod Sci. 2020 Nov 2;9:17. doi: 10.4103/jos.JOS_4_20. eCollection 2020.
8
Class II Division 1 malocclusion treatment with extraction of maxillary first molars: Evaluation of treatment and post-treatment changes by the PAR Index.骨性 II 类 1 分类错(牙合)的拔牙矫治:PAR 指数评价治疗及治疗后变化。
Orthod Craniofac Res. 2021 Feb;24(1):102-110. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12412. Epub 2020 Sep 1.
9
Evaluation of objective and subjective treatment outcomes in orthodontic cases treated with extraction of a mandibular incisor.评价下颌切牙拔除矫治病例的客观和主观治疗效果。
Angle Orthod. 2019 Nov;89(6):862-867. doi: 10.2319/011018-25.1. Epub 2019 Jun 12.
10
Efficiency of compensatory orthodontic treatment of mild Class III malocclusion with two different bracket systems.两种不同托槽系统对轻度III类错牙合进行代偿性正畸治疗的疗效
Dental Press J Orthod. 2017 Nov-Dec;22(6):49-55. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.22.6.049-055.oar.