Nalbantgil Didem, Nur Yılmaz R Burcu, Akın Elif, Erden Mehmet Ali, Yılmaz Simay, Özdemir Fulya
Department of Orthodontics, Yeditepe University School of Dentistry, İstanbul, Turkey.
Department of Orthodontics, Marmara University School of Dentistry, İstanbul, Turkey.
Turk J Orthod. 2019 Mar;32(1):11-15. doi: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2019.18012. Epub 2019 Mar 1.
The purpose of the present study was to compare the perception of smile aesthetic between 3rd-, 4th-, and 5th-year dental students to identify if interdisciplinary courses have an impact on the attitudes of students.
A total of 118 dental students (3rd-, 4th-, and 5th-year; N=43, 43, and 32, respectively) assessed the aesthetic attractiveness of four smile photographs (normal, high, low, and asymmetric smile lines). To enhance the crown, length-to-width ratio and color Digital Smile Design (DSD) were applied to all photographs, and then scoring was performed by using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS).
The VAS scores were all <60 regardless of the year of the student. The lowest scores were given for asymmetric smile line. Comparison of the scores of the different years showed statistically insignificant scores between 3rd- and 4th-year dental students (p>0.05), whereas statistical differences between 4th- and 5th-year dental students were found (Cases 1, 2, and 3: p<0.05 and Case 4: p<0.01).
All students were critical in the evaluation of smiles. Hence, the motivation for critical thinking based on multidisciplinary courses until 3rd year, the skepticism, and also the perception of the students were increased. The difference between 4th- and 5th-year student aesthetic perceptions showed the impact of interdisciplinary course on enhanced judgment competency of the students.
本研究旨在比较三年级、四年级和五年级牙科学生对微笑美学的认知,以确定跨学科课程是否会对学生的态度产生影响。
共有118名牙科学生(三年级、四年级和五年级;分别为43名、43名和32名)对四张微笑照片(正常、高、低和不对称微笑线)的美学吸引力进行评估。为了增强牙冠、长宽比和颜色,对所有照片应用了数字微笑设计(DSD),然后使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)进行评分。
无论学生处于哪一年级,VAS评分均<60。不对称微笑线的得分最低。不同年级学生得分的比较显示,三年级和四年级牙科学生之间的得分在统计学上无显著差异(p>0.05),而四年级和五年级牙科学生之间存在统计学差异(病例1、2和3:p<0.05,病例4:p<0.01)。
所有学生在微笑评估中都很挑剔。因此,直到三年级基于多学科课程的批判性思维动机、怀疑态度以及学生的认知都有所增加。四年级和五年级学生美学认知的差异表明跨学科课程对提高学生判断能力的影响。